That seems strange, there's a labelled diagram here and what they've put just doesn't seem to match up. Specimen papers can be wrong sometimes though, I don't think they're checked as thoroughly.
That seems strange, there's a labelled diagram here and what they've put just doesn't seem to match up. Specimen papers can be wrong sometimes though, I don't think they're checked as thoroughly.
So I'm guessing they're wrong? It just doesn't match up and even if it is from a weird angle they have said the coronary artery is just one big vessel which can't be right.
So I'm guessing they're wrong? It just doesn't match up and even if it is from a weird angle they have said the coronary artery is just one big vessel which can't be right.
Yes, the mark scheme is wrong. There is no issue of any angle in identifying anatomical structures. You probably would get the mark, though I'm not really sure.
I think in the actual exam they'll give a diagram where the sides of the heart and which vessel is which are more obvious. This image is difficult to see
Yep, the mark scheme is wrong and your answers are right. It's pointed to one particular coronary artery (the left anterior descending) for you to label as "coronary arteries", but you'd still get the marks. It just looks like a rubbishly put together question!
Yep, the mark scheme is wrong and your answers are right. It's pointed to one particular coronary artery (the left anterior descending) for you to label as "coronary arteries", but you'd still get the marks. It just looks like a rubbishly put together question!