Does any good come from porn?

I agree it's not a good thing as a career but as a true representation of female sexuality, it's a better option than porn.

Here's the problem I have - half the people on TSR don't like the idea of prostitution, and they don't like the idea of pornography. The obvious TSR extension of this is to demand a ban.

There has to be a recognition that large numbers of people (and let's concentrate on males) aren't getting any sex.

This is a recipe for saying that a certain section of the population who aren't rich enough, good looking enough, lucky enough or are sufficiently lacking in chutzpah that they aren't going to get any.... these people are excluded from any kind of sexual experience, not just actual sex, but viewing it too.

Now it's clear that TSR is a very elitist community, but surely this is a step too far. Seriously? You want a say in who can and can't have sex or even watch it?

I wouldn't really care about porn but it gives men a warped sense of what sex should be and what women enjoy. A lot of men ARE getting sex etc, a majority of men aren't single, virgins by the time they are 25-30.

Apart from girl on girl porn you almost never see porn for the woman's benefit it's almost always touching her clit for a second, then shoving fingers in roughly then the woman gives rough head, then she gets banged roughly then banged anally followed by ejaculation in her eye.
99.9% of women don't orgasm that way.

Well, in a sense, you're not one of those who wants to ban everything.

In terms of warped sense- well from a certain point of view the same thing could be said of so many things. What you're saying is that pornography is a medium that disrupts sex. Well, arguably, media influences marriage or romance far more.

There are some people who think that there is a particular idea of what romance is - that it's about candlelit dinners, poetry or jewelery or whatever - is that any more a construct than pornography-inspired sex?

99.9% of men don't have the stress or job insecurity that all make porn actors suffer from. They also don't have to inject them dicks with drugs to maintain erections for hours while feeling very little satisfaction.

They also don't get forced into doing gay sex because they get paid far more for doing so.

So what exactly is your point here? That you're biased?

No not candlelight dinners or even romance, I mean more realistic sex, mutually pleasurable sex a womans clitoris is the most pleasurable part of her body it's touched or rubbed for about 30 seconds in a whole porno this is not relistic while giving head, and being banged constantly for the whole porno is apparently "very orgasmic for her and him" I'm not saying these things aren't pleasurable but the whole porno being centered on his orgasm isn't the reality of sex.

I'm not talking about sex. I'm talking about how unrealistic romance is.

If romance is unrealistic due to movies, TV and books; is it really so bad that sex can be equally unrealistic?

Yeah thats fine, as long as it's a fantasy being a selfish prick in bed won't get you much sex though & neither will you get the perfect boyfriend waiting for prince charming to come along

Agreed, though I think that webcamming is not the best career choice because of the following reasons:

1. Someone can recognize the webcam model (especially if she shows her face in the webcam) even when the lady is no longer webcamming but rather desires to pursue a career where respect for one's brain verses one's body is essential. For example, if a woman wanted a career in politics, it is really best not to be a webcam 'model', since an opponent would likely drudge up her past to share with everyone. A webcam model or porno 'queen' does not stir up a high level of respect in most voters for the position of being a leader of a community or country.

2. It contributes to the 'rape culture' where women are seen as sex objects, not as people who deserve respect and love.

3. Young and vulnerable girls could be drawn into this, lying about their age and falling into the lures of the clients for real sex as opposed to simply masturbating to their webcams, especially lures for $ or possessions in exchange for sex. Basically, it can lead to prostitution very easily, as well as underage prostitution, when young girls who want $ see it as a way to make money, even though it's illegal for them and mentally as well as physically harmful.

No not candlelight dinners or even romance, I mean more realistic sex, mutually pleasurable sex a womans clitoris is the most pleasurable part of her body it's touched or rubbed for about 30 seconds in a whole porno this is not relistic while giving head, and being banged constantly for the whole porno is apparently "very orgasmic for her and him" I'm not saying these things aren't pleasurable but the whole porno being centered on his orgasm isn't the reality of sex.

Here's the problem I have - half the people on TSR don't like the idea of prostitution, and they don't like the idea of pornography. The obvious TSR extension of this is to demand a ban.

There has to be a recognition that large numbers of people (and let's concentrate on males) aren't getting any sex.

This is a recipe for saying that a certain section of the population who aren't rich enough, good looking enough, lucky enough or are sufficiently lacking in chutzpah that they aren't going to get any.... these people are excluded from any kind of sexual experience, not just actual sex, but viewing it too.

Now it's clear that TSR is a very elitist community, but surely this is a step too far. Seriously? You want a say in who can and can't have sex or even watch it?

Straight male performers and giving performers don't have to put up with frequent tears, prolapses, incontinence & yeast infections a side effect of being banged all day and night.

Well I suppose when you're getting paid 5 times as much it's hard to sympathise.

Slightly off topic but OP and a couple of others that have commented you should probably know David Cameron is trying to make porn with rape storylines illegal to possess, I thought it had actually been enforced but it looks like the courts are still debating it if Wikipedia is right. Personally I think it's a stupid law since The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo depicts rape in one scene and that is much more realistic than what porn does, but you should probably know that since it sounds like you still watch porn with rape in it OP.

The Bill in question can be seen here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_Justice_and_Courts_Bill_2013%E2%80%9314