The Student Room Group

STEP I 2014 solutions

Scroll to see replies

Original post by DFranklin
Note that if ktanθ=1k \tan \theta = 1, then k=cosθ/sinθk = \cos \theta / \sin \theta, and then ky=Ucosθt12kgt2=xky = U \cos \theta t - \frac{1}{2}kgt^2 = x. So the path is actually a straight line.

(I don't know that they expected this, but to be honest I think they probably did).


I suspect that you are probably right. I'll update my post.
Question 10

i)

We need to be careful as the ball has a radius, so we shall pretend the ball is a point mass with position RR directly below the center of the actual ball.

So using v2=u2+2asv^2 = u^2 + 2as we get that the speed before the impact is 2gH\sqrt{2gH} and so the speed after the impact is e2gHe\sqrt{2gH}. Now we use v2=u2+2asv^2 = u^2 + 2as again to find the height by setting v=0v=0 and u=e2gHu = e\sqrt{2gH} to get s=e2Hs= e^2 H. Hence the center of the ball gets to R+e2HR + e^2 H.

ii)


The second part is more fiddly. We shall work from the point after the first ball has collided with the ground. So denoting v11,v12,v21,v22v_{11}, v_{12}, v_{21}, v_{22} as the velocity of the first and second balls before and after the collision respectively and taking up as positive we get:

v11=e2gHv_{11} = e\sqrt{2gH}

v21=2gHv_{21} = - \sqrt{2gH}

v22v12=e(v11v21)v_{22} - v_{12} = e(v_{11} - v_{21}) from restitution

Mv11+mv21=Mv12+mv22Mv_{11} + mv_{21} = Mv_{12} + mv_{22} from conservation of linear momentum

From the last two of these we can eliminate v12v_{12} and then rearrange to get Mm\frac{M}{m}:

Mm=v21v22v22v11+e(v21v11)\displaystyle \frac{M}{m} = \frac{v_{21} - v_{22}}{v_{22} - v_{11} + e(v_{21} - v_{11})}.

All that remains is to find v22v_{22} in terms of what we have numbers for (i.e. hh, RR and rr).

We note that the center of ball 2 starts 2R+r2R + r off the ground and hence it only moves up h(2R+r)h - (2R + r). So setting s=h(2R+r)s = h - (2R + r), u=v22u = v_{22} and v=0v = 0 in v2=u2+2asv^2 = u^2 + 2as we get:

v22=2g(h(2R+r))\displaystyle v_{22} = \sqrt{2g(h-(2R + r))}.

So putting the numbers in we get:

v11=4v_{11} = 4

v21=6v_{21} = -6

v22=9v_{22} = 9

which finally gives Mm=9\frac{M}{m} = 9.

[I have used g=10g=10, it may also be worth checking this thoroughly.]
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by DFranklin
Where did these come from?

I think this is too terse to be helpful, frankly. (Certainly you wouldn't get away with it in an exam).


I substituted it in, found alpha and beta by equating coefficients for u_n and u_n^2, then the constant simplifies to 0 by the given condition. It's just a lot of tedious messy algebra, nothing difficult. I'll expand it a bit.
STEP I, Q7

(i)



(ii)

(edited 9 years ago)
Reply 24
Original post by Tarquin Digby
I substituted it in, found alpha and beta by equating coefficients for u_n and u_n^2Yes, I know. But to be honest this is probably the bit of the question most people will fall down on, so to skip all the details seems a little, um, unhelpful.
Reply 25
Original post by Tarquin Digby
I substituted it in, found alpha and beta by equating coefficients for u_n and u_n^2, then the constant simplifies to 0 by the given condition. It's just a lot of tedious messy algebra, nothing difficult. I'll expand it a bit.
Sorry, I just noticed the last bit of your answer to the question. Note that for n> 2 (or something like that), the angle you are taking the sin of is definitely a multiple of pi, and so the sin = 0. This seems a little unlikely to be the correct solution, but I haven't actually checked to be sure it isn't.
Original post by DFranklin
Sorry, I just noticed the last bit of your answer to the question. Note that for n> 2 (or something like that), the angle you are taking the sin of is definitely a multiple of pi, and so the sin = 0. This seems a little unlikely to be the correct solution, but I haven't actually checked to be sure it isn't.


The sequence eventually becomes constant.
Reply 27
Original post by Tarquin Digby
The sequence eventually becomes constant.
Yeah that's definitely one possibility. It's just that if I'd set the question I would have made the initial value of theta was something like pi/3 so that it never went constant.
The hell is up with all dem smiley faces?

... :smile:

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by DFranklin
STEP I, Q11. (Interesting question, this!).

Disclaimer: I honestly can't remember the last pulley question I did, which means it's probably 20+ years ago. So methods etc. may not be standard.

For the first part, let T be the tension in the string. The acceleration of M is g - T/M, and the accel of m is g - T/m. For the string not to stretch, these must be equal.
So g - T/M = T/m - g, so Mmg - Tm = TM -Mmg, so 2Mmg = T(M+m), so T = 2Mmg/(M+m).
Then the acceleration of M = g - 2mg/(M+m) = g(M-m)/(M+m) as required.

For the 2nd part. Label the M1, M2 pulley P, and let the tension it its string be T. Let the tension in the other string be S. For legibility, write A for the acceleration a2.

Again, the acceleration of M is g - T/M and the acceleration of m is g-T/m. But relative to the pulley, the accelerations are (g+A) - T/M and (g+A) -T/m. So (replacing g in the earlier calculation with g+A) we end up with a
new value for the tension T=2(g+A)m1m2m1+m2=2(g+A)μT = 2(g+A)\dfrac{m_1m_2}{m_1+m_2} = 2(g+A)\mu.

Now, since the pulley is weightless, the net force on it must be zero, so we have 2T = S, so S=4(g+A)μS = 4(g+A)\mu. Now since the acceleration of M is A, we know the net force on M is MA.

So we must have Mg - S = MA. So Mg4(g+A)μ=MA Mg - 4(g+A)\mu = MA. So A(M+4μ)=g(M4μ)A(M+4\mu) = g(M-4\mu) so A=gM4μM+4μA = g\dfrac{M-4\mu}{M+4\mu} as required.

Now suppose gM4μM+4μ=gMmM+mg\dfrac{M-4\mu}{M+4\mu} = g \dfrac{M-m}{M+m}.
This is true iff M+4μ8μM+4μ=M+m2mM+m\dfrac{M+4\mu - 8\mu}{M+4\mu} = \dfrac{M+m-2m}{M+m} so 18μ/(M+4μ)=12m/(M+m)1-8\mu/(M+4\mu) = 1 - 2m/(M+m)
iff 4μ/(M+4μ)=m/(M+m)4\mu/(M+4\mu) = m/(M+m)
iff 4μ(M+m)=m(M+4μ)4\mu(M+m) = m(M+4\mu). So gM4μM+4μ=gMmM+mg\dfrac{M-4\mu}{M+4\mu} = g \dfrac{M-m}{M+m} iff 4μM+4μm=mM+4μM4\mu M + 4\mu m = mM + 4 \mu M iff 4μM=mM4\mu M = mM, iff
4 \mu = m,

But 4m1m2m1+m2=(m1+m2)4\dfrac{m_1m_2}{m_1+m_2} = (m_1+m_2) iff 4m1m2=(m1+m2)24m_1m_2 = (m_1+m_2)^2 iff (m1m2)2=0(m_1-m_2)^2 = 0 iff m1=m2m_1 = m_2.
Didn't it ask us for the magnitude of the force exerted on the pulley by tension, i.e. 2T? for system I that is
Original post by DFranklin
STEP I, Q12. Note that we can regard the dice as a 3 sided dice that takes values 1,2,3 with probability 1/2, 1/3, 1/6 respectively. Note also that E[|Y|^2] = E[Y^2].

So E[X2]=12(12(k1)2+13(2k1)2+16(3k1)2)+12(12(k1)2+13(k2)2+16(k3)2)E[X^2] = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2} (k-1)^2 + \frac{1}{3} (2k-1)^2 + \frac{1}{6}(3k-1)^2) + \frac{1}{2} (\frac{1}{2} (k-1)^2 + \frac{1}{3}(k-2)^2 + \frac{1}{6}(k-3)^2)

=112(3(k1)2+2(2k1)2+(3k1)2+3(k1)2+2(k2)2+(k3)2)=\frac{1}{12} (3(k-1)^2 + 2(2k-1)^2 + (3k-1)^2 + 3(k-1)^2 + 2(k-2)^2 + (k-3)^2)

=112(6(k1)2+2(2k1)2+(3k1)2+2(k2)2+(k3)2)=\frac{1}{12} (6(k-1)^2 + 2(2k-1)^2 + (3k-1)^2 + 2(k-2)^2 + (k-3)^2)

=112(6k212k+6+8k28k+2+9k26k+1+2k28k+8+k26k+9)=\frac{1}{12}(6k^2 - 12k+6 + 8k^2 - 8k+2 + 9k^2 - 6k + 1 + 2k^2 -8k + 8 + k^2 - 6k + 9)

=112(6+8+9+2+1)k2(12+8+6+8+6)k+(6+2+1+8+9))=\frac{1}{12}(6+8+9+2+1)k^2 - (12+8+6+8+6)k + (6+2+1+8+9))

=112(26k240k+26)=1613k220k+13=\frac{1}{12}(26k^2 - 40k + 26) = \frac{1}{6}{13k^2 - 20k + 13}

=16(13k226k+13+6k)= \frac{1}{6}(13k^2 - 26k + 13 + 6k)=k+136(k1)2= k + \frac{13}{6}(k-1)^2 as desired.

If k is an integer and E[X^2] is also an integer, then 6 must divide (k-1)^2, and so 6 must divide (k-1) (since both 2 and 3 must divide it). So if k is a single digit integer, we must have k = 7.

PDF of X: The "head" values for X are 6, 13 and 20 with probabilities 1/4, 1/6, 1/12 respectively.
The "tail" values for X are 6, 5, 4 with probabilities 1/4, 1/6, 1/12 respectively.
So combining these we finally have
P(X = 4) = 1/12, P(X=5) = 1/6, P(X=6) = 1/2, P(X=13) = 1/6, P(X=20) = 1/12.

For the sum of two rounds to = 25, we need either X=5, then X=20 or vice versa, with probability 2 x (1/6) x (1/12) = 1/36.
For the sum of two rounds to be > 25, we need either (6, 20), (13, 20), (20, 20), (13, 13) or (20, 6) or (20, 13).
The probability of this happening is 2 x ((1/2) x (1/12) + (1/6) x (1/12)) + (1/6)^2 + (1/12)^2 = 2 x (1/24 + 1/72) + 1/36 + 1/144 = (2 x (6+2) + 4 + 1) / 144 = 21 /144 = 7/48.

The expected return for the gambler is 7w/48+1/36 (ignoring the loss of the original stake).

The expected profit for the casino is 1 - 7w/48 - 1/36 = (144 - 21 w - 4) = (140-21w). So we require 21w < 140. If w is an integer, the greatest possible value is w = 6.

[Alternative].


"For the sum of two rounds to be > 25, we..."

How many marks do u think i would get if i did everything up to ( but not including)this point correctly. I ran out of time so couldnt complete the question
Reply 31
Original post by Pascal678
Didn't it ask us for the magnitude of the force exerted on the pulley by tension, i.e. 2T? for system I that is
Yes, you're right. Thanks - I've edited the question. (I have to swap tabs between TSR and the Dropbox page while answering these questions, it makes it easy to miss bits of the question!).
Reply 32
Original post by newblood
"For the sum of two rounds to be > 25, we..."

How many marks do u think i would get if i did everything up to ( but not including)this point correctly. I ran out of time so couldnt complete the question
I'd guess something like 12 marks. The last part is reasonably short, but also has the most opportunity to mess up, so it's probably worth a little more than its length would justify.
Original post by DFranklin
Yeah that's definitely one possibility. It's just that if I'd set the question I would have made the initial value of theta was something like pi/3 so that it never went constant.


Substitute v(0) = 1 in the 'v' equations and you find the sequence is 1,3,-1,-1,... So yes it does become constant. This is also a useful check.
Reply 34
Original post by JosephML
Question 10
[I have used g=10g=10, it may also be worth checking this thoroughly.]
I think if you look more carefully at your equations, you'll see that everything has a common factor of g\sqrt{g} (in both numerator and denominator), so the value of g cancels out.
Original post by DFranklin
STEP I, Q5.

(i) Not going to do the sketch, but if y = (x+2a)^3 -27a^2x, then dy/dx = 3(x+2a)^2 - 27a^2. When x = a, y = dy/dx = 0, so y = (x-a)^2(x-b) for some value b. Comparing constant coefficients, -a^2b = 8a^3, so b = -8 and so y >=0 for x >= -8. Note that for x > 0, y = 0 iff x = a.

(ii) Want to maximize xy^2 subject to x+2y <= 3. By the above, we know that (x+2y)^3 >= 27xy^2, so 27xy^2 <= (x+2y)^3 <= 3^3 = 27. We also know we need x = y if we want (x+2y)^3 = 27xy^2. So it is only in this case that we have 27xy^2 = (x+2y)^3, and of course we only have (x+2y)^3 = 27 when x+2y = 3. So xy^2 is maximized then x = y = 1.

(iii) (p+q+r)^3 = (p + 2(q+r)/2) ^2 >= 27 p (q+r)^2 / 4. But (q+r)^2 / 4 - qr = (q^2 + 2qr +r^2 -4qr) / 4 =(p-q)^2 / 4 > = 0. So (q+r)^2 / 4 >= qr, so 27p(q+r)^2/4 >= 27pqr.

For equality in (q+r)^2 / 4 >= qr, we need q = r. For equality in (p + 2(q+r)/2) ^2 >= 27 p (q+r)^2 / 4 we need p = (q+r)/2. Hence we have equality iff p = q = r.


I do not understand how , at the beginning of (iii) you have (p+q+r)3=(p+2(q+r)2)2.(p+q+r)^3=\left(p+\frac{2(q+r)}{2} \right)^2.
How has the index reduced from 3 to 2 ?
Reply 36
Typo. I don't think there's any follow on - it's strictly a typo for that one expression.
Original post by Tarquin Digby
STEP 1 Q6

i)
u1=sin22θu_1 = \sin^2 2 \theta

u2=sin24θu_2 = \sin^2 4 \theta

Suppose uk=sin2(2kθ)u_k = \sin^2 (2^k \theta) for some kk.

Then uk+1=4sin2(2kθ)(1sin2(2kθ))=4sin2(2kθ)cos2(2kθ)=sin2(2k+1θ)u_{k + 1} = 4 \sin^2 (2^k \theta) (1 - \sin^2 (2^k \theta)) = 4 \sin^2 (2^k \theta) \cos^2 (2^k \theta) = \sin^2 (2^{k+1} \theta).

Hence un=sin2(2nθ)u_n = \sin^2 (2^n \theta) for all n1n \ge 1 by induction.

ii)

Let α=4p\alpha = \dfrac 4 p and β=q42p\beta = \dfrac {q-4} {2p}.

Substitute vn=αun+βv_n = \alpha u_n + \beta.

Then we have:

4pun+1+q42p=p(4pun+q42p)2+q(4pun+q42p)+r\dfrac 4 p u_{n+1} + \dfrac {q-4} {2p} = -p \left(\dfrac 4 p u_n + \dfrac {q-4} {2p} \right)^2 + q \left( \dfrac 4 p u_n + \dfrac {q-4} {2p} \right) + r

Rearranging:

un+1=4un2+4un+116(4pr82q+q2)u_{n+1} = -4u_n^2 + 4u_n + \frac 1 {16} \left( 4pr - 8 - 2q + q^2 \right)

We're given 4pr=8+2qq24pr = 8 + 2q - q^2 , so

un+1=4un(1un)u_{n+1} = 4u_n (1 - u_n) as required.

If vn+1=vn2+2vn+2v_{n+1} = - v_n^2 + 2 v_n +2 then p=1p=1, q=2q=2 and r=2r=2.

This satisfies 4pr=8+2qq24pr = 8 + 2q - q^2.

Also, α=4\alpha = 4 and β=1\beta = -1.

Therefore un=sin2(2nθ)u_n = \sin^2 (2^n \theta) where vn=4un1v_n = 4u_n - 1.

v0=1v_0 = 1, so u0=12u_0 = \dfrac 1 2 which implies θ=π4\theta = \dfrac {\pi} 4.

Hence vn=4sin2(2nπ4)1=4sin2(2n2π)1\displaystyle v_n = 4 \sin^2 \left(2^n \frac {\pi} 4\right) - 1 = 4 \sin^2 (2^{n-2} \pi) - 1.


How did you decide on α=4p , β=q42p \alpha=\frac{4}{p}\ ,\ \beta=\frac{q-4}{2p}
Original post by Tarquin Digby
I substituted it in, found alpha and beta by equating coefficients for u_n and u_n^2, then the constant simplifies to 0 by the given condition. It's just a lot of tedious messy algebra, nothing difficult. I'll expand it a bit.


Substituting vn=αun+β into un+1=4un(1un) v_n=\alpha u_n+\beta \text{ into } u_{n+1}=4u_n(1-u_n) gives
vn+1=p(αvn+β)2+q(αvn+β)+r v_{n+1}=-p(\alpha v_n+\beta)^2 +q(\alpha v_n+\beta)+r so the equating the coeficients of un2u_n^2 gives pα2=4 p\alpha^2=4 so I still don't see how you got p[br]α=4pp[br]\alpha=\frac{4}{p}
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by brianeverit
Substituting vn=αun+β into un+1=4un(1un) v_n=\alpha u_n+\beta \text{ into } u_{n+1}=4u_n(1-u_n) gives
vn+1=p(αvn+β)2+q(αvn+β)+r v_{n+1}=-p(\alpha v_n+\beta)^2 +q(\alpha v_n+\beta)+r so the equating the coeficients of un2u_n^2 gives pα2=4 p\alpha^2=4 so I still don't see how you got p[br]α=4pp[br]\alpha=\frac{4}{p}


So after the substitution we have

αun+1+β=p(αun+β)2+q(αun+β)+r \alpha u_{n+1} + \beta = -p \left(\alpha u_n + \beta \right)^2 + q \left( \alpha u_n + \beta \right) + r

Rearrange a little

un+1=pα(αun+β)2+qα(αun+β)+rαβα \displaystyle u_{n+1} = - \frac p {\alpha} \left(\alpha u_n + \beta \right)^2 + \frac q {\alpha} \left( \alpha u_n + \beta \right) + \frac r {\alpha} - \frac {\beta} {\alpha}

Then equating coefficients with un+1=4un(1un)u_{n+1} = 4 u_n (1 - u_n) we obtain

pαα2=4- \dfrac p {\alpha} \alpha^2 = - 4

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending