The Student Room Group

The Rich are taxed too much!

Scroll to see replies

Reply 20
Original post by behindblueglass
In my opinion it's the lower middle class that really get hit hard by taxes and the economy. My parents both work, my mum works 6 nights a week 14 hour shifts and looses about 200 a week to taxes. My stepdad drives lorries all over Europe and can be gone for weeks and weeks at a time. We still live in a house too small for us and have two basic cars. They still can't afford to fund me at university and I'm saving up myself. But Combined they loose about 10-15,000 in taxes.

But if you think about it, there are people all over the world suffering and we are just lucky to have the basic necessities we take for granted.


So your mum is on £40k
And your dad on £20k or so.

I'm suprised on tax home pay of £45k combined they can only afford basic necessities.

Then again, you seem to think two cars are count as those :s-smilie:
Reply 21
Original post by illegaltobepoor
Oliver spends 100% of his income per week on living, breathing, drinking and basically surviving. He will pay hundreds of taxes from tax on food, travel, energy etc.

Since the poor need to spend all of their income to live they will always pay a higher proportion of their income towards tax. This will only cease till society becomes more fair, inclusive and doesn't waste human potential.


Food - 0%
Housing - 0%
Travel - 0% (bus' and trains, not taxis)
Energy - 5%

So how is Oliver spending 'hundreds'? All those taxi journies?
Original post by Quady
Food - 0%
Housing - 0%
Travel - 0% (bus' and trains, not taxis)
Energy - 5%

So how is Oliver spending 'hundreds'? All those taxi journies?


Travel = Fuel Duty/Road Tax.

Just because a person doesn't pay for the fuel at the pump doesn't mean that it isn't part of their tax contribution.

Housing = Utility Bills with Green Taxes.

Again the Government has been making Energy companies cough up with the ECO levy. The energy company then increases prices to make up for the gap in profits.

Food = Import Tariffs, Energy Taxes and Corporation Tax which is added on when the food changes hands from Producer to Food Company to Wholesaler to Supermarket etc

Energy = Levys, Carbon Emissions Taxes, Climate change Taxes.

The list goes on.
Original post by Quady
So your mum is on £40k
And your dad on £20k or so.

I'm suprised on tax home pay of £45k combined they can only afford basic necessities.

Then again, you seem to think two cars are count as those :s-smilie:


Depends where you live. If you live in London most of your pay is going on Rent. I think one should 1st deduct housing costs per year then look at net spare income.
Original post by Sanctimonious
If you vote for capitalist parties and get capitalist policies you're in no position to moan. Only socialism will help combat inequality. Capitalism helps inequality to manifest because capitalism breeds greed. When greedy people get rich they want to keep it all. They're greedy after all. Most develop the old 'I earned it. Its mine' attitude.

Whilst capitalism is around there will always be mass inequality. Its in their economic interests to keep those at the bottom because by doing so they have a work force as opposed to competition. Competition isn't good for profits. The whole system is set up to favour the rich.

People are deluding themselves if they think its going to change any time soon and if you vote for a capitalist supporting party you're indirectly supporting that inequality that comes as part of it.


I agree, however I hope you're not suggesting people vote Labour, who are in effect a neoliberal red tory party.... Inequality increased massively in the years 1997-2010.

Problem is, the 'left of centre' in this country (i.e. Labour) are unfortunately well on the right. The alternative? Well, I vote green...
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by Bulbasaur
I agree, however I hope you're not suggesting people vote Labour, who are in effect a neoliberal red tory party.... Inequality increased massively in the years 1997-2010.

Problem is, the 'left of centre' in this country (i.e. Labour) are unfortunately well on the right. The alternative? Well, I vote green...

Labour are Tory basically just hidden in a 'we are still socialist' veil. They're capitalist to their core.
Reply 26
Original post by illegaltobepoor
Depends where you live. If you live in London most of your pay is going on Rent. I think one should 1st deduct housing costs per year then look at net spare income.


pfft even ignore the rent then.

Unless you're buying new clothes its just energy bills. 5% VAT on energy would amount to mebby £50 over a year. Water is zero rated too.
Reply 27
Original post by illegaltobepoor
Travel = Fuel Duty/Road Tax.

Just because a person doesn't pay for the fuel at the pump doesn't mean that it isn't part of their tax contribution.

Housing = Utility Bills with Green Taxes.

Again the Government has been making Energy companies cough up with the ECO levy. The energy company then increases prices to make up for the gap in profits.

Food = Import Tariffs, Energy Taxes and Corporation Tax which is added on when the food changes hands from Producer to Food Company to Wholesaler to Supermarket etc

Energy = Levys, Carbon Emissions Taxes, Climate change Taxes.

The list goes on.


OK, so other legal entities have to pay tax, rather than Oliver? A bit like suggesting my employees wage bill is very high because I employ the barman at the pub I go to and the ticket inspector on my train.

Remind me where Oliver gets his money... :s-smilie:
Original post by behindblueglass
In my opinion it's the lower middle class that really get hit hard by taxes and the economy. My parents both work, my mum works 6 nights a week 14 hour shifts and looses about 200 a week to taxes. My stepdad drives lorries all over Europe and can be gone for weeks and weeks at a time. We still live in a house too small for us and have two basic cars. They still can't afford to fund me at university and I'm saving up myself. But Combined they loose about 10-15,000 in taxes.

But if you think about it, there are people all over the world suffering and we are just lucky to have the basic necessities we take for granted.


I think what you really need to look at is mortgage/rent prices, cost of living prices and good financial choices. There people living up North on small incomes of £13,000 per year yet they live comfortable.

I'll tell you how they do it.

Up North in places like Hull you can rent a 2 bedroom house for as low as £200 a month privately! That is like £46 a week.
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-to-rent/property-46694282.html

Then you make good financial choices for your budget. So for example:

1. All home utilities must be the budget economy ones from £1.75 Talk Talk broadband to Fixed Electricity & Gas deals.
2. Make sure your home is fitted with energy efficient appliances and lighting.
3. Get a water meter installed and divert all drainage to a water butt to use in the garden.
4. Opt for a cheap mode of transport. If your single get a 125cc Motorbike/Scooter. If you have a young family get a cheap hatchback that can do 60MPG+.

And when it comes to the weekly food shop you must explore every shop. Do it on-line first for the main Supermarkets and then explore the cheaper Shops like Farmfoods, Heron and Lidil. Oh and always go into the Pound Shops. Your be surprised what you can find.

I've been eating Tandoori Chicken for as low as £3.25 per Kilo. You buy that stuff from Tesco or Asda and your pay £20.00 per kilo. That is a saving of 600%!

But then again my profession is finance so.
Original post by Quady
OK, so other legal entities have to pay tax, rather than Oliver? A bit like suggesting my employees wage bill is very high because I employ the barman at the pub I go to and the ticket inspector on my train.

Remind me where Oliver gets his money... :s-smilie:


You want to win the argument by pointing out the fictional guy is on benefits? Ah well since its fiction we can pimp Oliver into the working poor. He got a 30 hour per week job and now he is claiming Tax Credits. So he is a Scrounger-Striver now! He's gone up a rank.

Quady you have to think of it this way. We live in a world where we all use and consume goods and services. Some of these goods and services are taxed more than others. If the Poor spend 99.9% of their income and that money is spent on key things like Energy, Food and Gasoline the proportion of wealth contributed to tax will always be very high. It is an easy calculation.

Just for the past 5 years we have this mind set where we have been ignoring fact and treating those who proportionally give the least as hero's of the economy.

Sure if you want to play a numbers game the Rich will always come out on top. Hell we could slap each other in the face right now about who has more net-worth but we proportionally don't really give that much in tax as the poorest in society who spend 99.9% of their income each calender month.

Can't you understand this? Its Economics 101.
Agreed, top level tax does nothing but damage investment.
Original post by Bulbasaur
I agree, however I hope you're not suggesting people vote Labour, who are in effect a neoliberal red tory party.... Inequality increased massively in the years 1997-2010.

Problem is, the 'left of centre' in this country (i.e. Labour) are unfortunately well on the right. The alternative? Well, I vote green...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH_MBwQhGgA

Watch this video on Youtube.

"I was stoned on election day thats why I voted Greens"
I don't think the rich pay too much in tax, however I do believe the poor should be made to pay more in tax. Society requires a contribution from all not one class of people scrounging from another.

Its funny how this thread is essentially one that tries to argue that the rich doesn't pay the most in taxes using some rather dodgy means.

Pity some people just can't accept the world isn't fair and deal with it.

Thankfully not much will ever happen regardless of the political party as no matter what politicians need the rich far more than they need the poor or the scumbags of society.
Reply 33
Original post by illegaltobepoor
You want to win the argument by pointing out the fictional guy is on benefits? Ah well since its fiction we can pimp Oliver into the working poor. He got a 30 hour per week job and now he is claiming Tax Credits. So he is a Scrounger-Striver now! He's gone up a rank.

Quady you have to think of it this way. We live in a world where we all use and consume goods and services. Some of these goods and services are taxed more than others. If the Poor spend 99.9% of their income and that money is spent on key things like Energy, Food and Gasoline the proportion of wealth contributed to tax will always be very high. It is an easy calculation.

Just for the past 5 years we have this mind set where we have been ignoring fact and treating those who proportionally give the least as hero's of the economy.

Sure if you want to play a numbers game the Rich will always come out on top. Hell we could slap each other in the face right now about who has more net-worth but we proportionally don't really give that much in tax as the poorest in society who spend 99.9% of their income each calender month.

Can't you understand this? Its Economics 101.


I just can't see how someone who pays a greater proportion of their income on income tax/NI and spends more on goods/services which are 20% VAT rated are going to end up spending a lower proportion of their income in tax than someone who is just 'paying' tax via taxes further down the supply chain.

The taxes you identify are paid by everyone on all of their spend. If you had an idea how much they are that would be handy (as I've no idea). However, it'll apply on all spend so unless the 'rich' (whatever they're defined as) are saving high proportions of their income I can't see how the 'poor' (whatever they're defined as) overtake them in terms of proportion of income going to tax.
Original post by Quady
Its £42k - less than 15% of those in employment pay higher rate.

Its also a marginal rate, someone on £60k pays less than a third on
income tax/NI/council tax.

And pensions and other stuff is tax deductable.


well that must have been a recent change
and my parents were by no means rich when they were working - we live(d) in a bungalow on a street with a lot of small houses, and we still got the 40% tax - most people we knew lived in similar or bigger houses - why would we get taxed that high for a middle class lifestyle? almost half, I mean come on, maybe if you were earning many hundreds of thousands, perhaps, but not £42k~ (which my dad once earned)
(edited 9 years ago)
Reply 35
Original post by zippity.doodah
well that must have been a recent change
and my parents were by no means rich when they were working - we live(d) in a bungalow on a street with a lot of small houses, and we still got the 40% tax - most people we knew lived in similar or bigger houses - why would we get taxed that high for a middle class lifestyle? almost half, I mean come on, maybe if you were earning many hundreds of thousands, perhaps, but not £42k~ (which my dad once earned)


Not really, it used to be higher (circa £44k) but has been reduced as the personal allowance has been risen so higher rate taxpayers didn't get the benefit.

Because you're in the top 15% of earners...?

I'll point out again, its nowhere near half, its a marginal rate, not on all your income.
Original post by Quady
Not really, it used to be higher (circa £44k) but has been reduced as the personal allowance has been risen so higher rate taxpayers didn't get the benefit.

Because you're in the top 15% of earners...?

I'll point out again, its nowhere near half, its a marginal rate, not on all your income.


it's almost as if you're *defending* the government taking this level of money from individuals
Reply 37
Original post by zippity.doodah
it's almost as if you're *defending* the government taking this level of money from individuals


meh, I'm a low end higher rate taxpayer (aka 40% band) and feel pretty well off.

22% of my pay goes on national insurance and income tax, which doesn't seem too draconian.

What rate should the top 10-15% of earners pay?
Original post by Quady

What rate should the top 10-15% of earners pay?


10-15% obviously.
Original post by Quady
meh, I'm a low end higher rate taxpayer (aka 40% band) and feel pretty well off.

22% of my pay goes on national insurance and income tax, which doesn't seem too draconian.

What rate should the top 10-15% of earners pay?


you're talking to a guy that believes in flat taxation
but if we *had* to have some kind of progressive system of taxation I'd say 10%, 20% and 30% - starting on past the minimum wage for the first, £40k~ = 20 and £100,000 = 30
and yes, I know the budget would need to be lowered a huge amount to allow this

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending