Finally some people who don't find the Fault in Our Stars to be a work of literary genius.
People kept recommending it to me so I read it about a year ago and it was frankly a waste of my time. The characters were cliches and the book was a formulaic 'this will make teenage girls cry' money making plot.
Whilst reading it, I realised that the reason for its popularity was that it pandered to the majority of teenagers hopes and dreams. A lot of young people are confused about where life is going and want to make meaning of it; the protagonists of this novel are the type of teenagers who are intelligent and use metaphors in every other bl**dy sentence. Teenage girls want a hot guy. August is a hot guy who falls in love with Hazel; it is blatantly obvious that her character was created with the idea that readers would easily be able to use her as a self-insert. These factors amongst other things made me think that it was not a very heartfelt book but instead extremely manufactured.
Augustus was a pretty annoying male lead; him being so pretentious made me want to put the book down a lot of the time. However, a lot of defenders of TFioS say 'OH but John Green wrote him to be pretentious so that you could see it was all an act when he dies'...
No! Maybe John Green meant him to be an annoying little sh*t, but that doesn't mean I like him any more!
Finally (sorry for the long post) this book was just too similar to all of Green's other YA novels. Main character meets romantic lead who is mysterious and meaningful. They go on a sentimental journey together and realise ultimate truths about the world. Romantic lead dies and main character is left to ponder their existence and why romantic lead was taken so young. The only difference here was that the roles were genderbent and cancer was added to the mix.
I didn't feel as though this book portrayed young people, let alone young people with cancer well at all.
There are definitely books which deal with the sensitive subject matter better.