Is it anti semetic to think that jews have too much power?

Source: JEWWATCH.COM

Gtfo.

The worlds oldest and most supremacist ethnic cult doesn't want to give up its power it seems. As Voltaire said:

“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

Judaism isn't the issue. Jews are not the issue. Zionism & Zionists are the issue.

We cannot criticise people with Down's syndrome, ergo, people with Down's Syndrome rule over us.

What kind of source were you expecting. It's not like being a Jew is breaking news?

Most of what you say is generally true. Both the environment and genetics have a role to play and I do not dispute this.

However, I used the example of von Neumann for a good reason, and that was for his precocious ability (i.e. he was a child prodigy). For example, at the age of 6 he was able to divide two eight-digit numbers in his head. He also had a photographic memory. Such abilities cannot be taught. No amount of money or education can make a six-year-old child divide these numbers in their head. I mentioned the game of chess for a similar reason -- to succeed requires raw intelligence and the benefit of having a banker as a Dad would be less than for fields like Physics or History. A good education can take somebody only so far. It accounts well for doctors, lawyers, and architects, but for chess grandmasters, Nobel prize-winners, and child prodigies less so.

We cannot criticise people with Down's syndrome, ergo, people with Down's Syndrome rule over us.

Rupert Murdoch has a Jewish roots. Founder and Executive Chairman of Viacom is a Jew. Lets have a look at the assets of Walt Disney and Fox alone.

Politics? Well they have got away with a lot, on top of that being the highest receiver of foreign aid from the US.

Actually Voltaire has a point. You can criticise downs syndrome people, but you don't because of morals. If you did, some people might be annoyed but you're not going to be oppressed by the people you criticised, you may well be by someone defending them but that's not the point. In North Korea say, to get away from the Jewish context, you can't criticise Dear Leader because if you did he'd probably feed you to a dog or give you 10 years hard labour. Here your target of criticism is also the oppressor and I think that's what Voltaire was getting at.

Why do atheists continue to call jewish people semitic. Someone is not semitic they speak a semetic language. Arabs speak a semetic language but if you cuss one why are you not called anti-semitic? if you dont believe religion existed why call them semits. Unless you accept that they are the descendants of shem himself?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Yes, but for every well-known polymathic renaissance genius with an extensive wikipedia entry, there are probably a dozen child prodigies who are unknown because their parents were taxi drivers or they come from broken homes or the schools they went to were undemanding.

Ethnic nepotism doesn't win people Nobel prizes. The beauty of science is that the reputation of the scientist is determined almost completely by the aptitude of that scientist to practice science. No bull ****. No politics. Just intelligence and work rate determine one's standing in the scientific arena.

It is very telling that people who view Jews negatively like to mention their "disproportionate" influence in politics, finance, banking, etc. but almost always fail to mention their vast achievements in science and mathematics. This is because they want to imply rather bitterly that their pre-eminence is the sole product of petty tribalism or nepotism, and of course their achievements in science and mathematics (where the benefit of nepotsim would be much less) argue against this notion.

Every individual should have as much power as they can get through legitimate means.

Indeed. Let's drop the unspoken bomb here: there's compelling evidence to suggest that Ashkenazi Jews have a higher IQ than the general white population, on average. Their continued outperformance in a variety of cognitively demanding areas - science, maths, chess, etc. - attests to this.

As such, it is not particularly surprising that they are also successful in industry and finance.

The only point of interest that could arise in this discussion is if successful Jews are able and willing to parlay that success into oppressing non-Jews in society. There is no evidence to suggest this is the case - there does not seem to be discrimination against non-Jews in businesses or universities, for instance. Therefore, this is as much a non-issue as is the fact that Indians are overrepresented in Silicon Valley, that men are overrepresented as CEOs, and that blacks are overrepresented in athletics.

So is it anti semetic to think or say that jews have too much power and political influence around the world

It is not anti-Semitic to suggest that Judaism has too much power, but it is anti-Semitic to suggest that Jews have too much power. Cultural groups don't have power; individuals do.

oh come on...

Unless you want to raise an actual objection to something that I said, I may as well ignore you.

okay so if I said "jewish individuals* have too much power" (I don't actually think this, I'm just doing this to reply to your difficulty) how would you feel then?