The Student Room Group

Traders: minimal risk investment?

Okay, so I was at the office today just trying to come up with various ways to beat the market. It's probably already being done if it's viable.

So let's take securities like publicly traded equities/fixed income/CDs that pay a dividend yield or coupon. Let's say that these are blue chip, highly liquidated stocks. If you were to buy a stock/bond/CD on dividend ex-date and take out an option till dividend/coupon pay date to hedge against the risk of market fluctuation... Surely, as long as the premium payment of the option is lower than the return on the yield/coupon payment, you've essentially made a profit with potentially 0 risk exposure, after the initial premium payment.

What are the limitations to this strategy, if any?
(edited 9 years ago)

Scroll to see replies

Bump!
Original post by Abdul-Karim
Bump!


How much capital are you working with? In terms of inputs
I disagree with the idea in practice.
Original post by Galileo Galilei
How much capital are you working with? In terms of inputs


Not factoring in capital, just looking at whether the fundamental construct would work in practice. It seems too good to be true.

The only flaw I can see, is that you'll be unable to get an option premium below the dividend yield.
Original post by Abdul-Karim
Not factoring in capital, just looking at whether the fundamental construct would work in practice. It seems too good to be true.

The only flaw I can see, is that you'll be unable to get an option premium below the dividend yield.


Sorry about that, I always think of trades in numerical terms.
Original post by Abdul-Karim
Not factoring in capital, just looking at whether the fundamental construct would work in practice. It seems too good to be true.

The only flaw I can see, is that you'll be unable to get an option premium below the dividend yield.


I agree with this flaw, this is probably the biggest flaw as it seems the option premium for this trade would be high due to the time value of the asset which would also be very high.
Original post by Abdul-Karim
Not factoring in capital, just looking at whether the fundamental construct would work in practice. It seems too good to be true.

The only flaw I can see, is that you'll be unable to get an option premium below the dividend yield.


I also feel that if you have the right security plan you may not need to hedge your bets.

I still feel that the ultimate way to reduce risk is through a mixed portfolio!
Personally, I am not interested in these trades as I would need to have a large input to reap any decent reward worth my time. I prefer Forex.
Original post by Galileo Galilei
I also feel that if you have the right security plan you may not need to hedge your bets.

I still feel that the ultimate way to reduce risk is through a mixed portfolio!


Yeah fair enough.. you can't go wrong with diversity.

Original post by Galileo Galilei
Personally, I am not interested in these trades as I would need to have a large input to reap any decent reward worth my time. I prefer Forex.


How long do you hold positions for on average?
Original post by Abdul-Karim
Okay, so I was at the office today just trying to come up with various ways to beat the market. It's probably already being done if it's viable.

So let's take securities like publicly traded equities/fixed income/CDs that pay a dividend yield or coupon. Let's say that these are blue chip, highly liquidated stocks. If you were to buy a stock/bond/CD on dividend ex-date and take out an option till dividend/coupon pay date to hedge against the risk of market fluctuation... Surely, as long as the premium payment of the option is lower than the return on the yield/coupon payment, you've essentially made a profit with potentially 0 risk exposure, after the initial premium payment.

What are the limitations to this strategy, if any?


If you go back and look at basic option pricing you'll find that even in no model pricing this doesn't work by no arbitrage. So any model that introduces extra assumptions will also not allow this strategy.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by LightBlueSoldier
If you go back and look at basic option pricing you'll find that even in no model pricing this doesn't work by no arbitrage. So any model that introduces extra assumptions will also not allow this strategy.


Posted from TSR Mobile


Thought so.. damn quants. Thanks man!
It won't hold by no arbitrage. Better off just having a diverse portfolio.
Original post by Abdul-Karim
Yeah fair enough.. you can't go wrong with diversity.



How long do you hold positions for on average?


On average, 1.4 hours.
Original post by Galileo Galilei
On average, 1.4 hours.


lol
Original post by Mr Chang
lol


Forex markets move quickly Chang.
Original post by Galileo Galilei
Forex markets move quickly Chang.


Volatility in FX has been crushed over the years. They don't move that quickly.
Reply 17
To make this is a bit simpler. You could use a forward instead on an option.

You would buy the security in the spot market and simultaneously sell it forward after you've received the coupon. With the removal of the optionality this is essentially a reverse repo (more precisely a buy/sell back). In the case of a bond the forward would settle on the dirty price therefore taking into account the dropping of the coupon.

Where there is potential to earn return is via the funding. Implicit in the calculation of the forward selling price is a rate of funding, if you can fund more cheaply than the person pricing the forward (they will short the security and cover it on reverse repo) then you can potentially make a profit. Your market risk exposure would be if your funding cost spiked as the rate of return you would earn on this structure would be fixed. i.e. If you funded the bond on overnight repo while entering into a 1 week forward and overnight rates increased during the week you could lose money.
Original post by DeeDub
To make this is a bit simpler. You could use a forward instead on an option.

You would buy the security in the spot market and simultaneously sell it forward after you've received the coupon. With the removal of the optionality this is essentially a reverse repo (more precisely a buy/sell back). In the case of a bond the forward would settle on the dirty price therefore taking into account the dropping of the coupon.

Where there is potential to earn return is via the funding. Implicit in the calculation of the forward selling price is a rate of funding, if you can fund more cheaply than the person pricing the forward (they will short the security and cover it on reverse repo) then you can potentially make a profit. Your market risk exposure would be if your funding cost spiked as the rate of return you would earn on this structure would be fixed. i.e. If you funded the bond on overnight repo while entering into a 1 week forward and overnight rates increased during the week you could lose money.


I see the logic. In essence you have to expose yourself to some level of risk, although the forward tool is seemingly a viable option. I'll read into more hedging techniques and come up with some more ideas. Financial markets.. some really interesting stuff, a world of opportunity.
Original post by maths learner
Volatility in FX has been crushed over the years. They don't move that quickly.


There is still a fair amount of volatility in FX

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending