You are ridiculous.
This criticism was always inevitable, because the point of academies was to give schools and teachers more freedom. Whilst most have used this freedom to excel, some were always going to make bad decisions which would result in, yes, failure. Unfortunately, that is life. But people are letting their ideological hatred of academies cloud out the facts, which are that academies, on average, perform significantly better than council-run schools.
Loads of council-run schools are rated inadequate. A far higher proportion, incidentally, than academies. Does this mean that council-run schools are a failed experiment? Well many would argue yes, which is why the academies were brought in in the first place.
You have chains like Harris with an outstanding record of taking over failing schools in poor areas and drastically improving their GCSE scores within just a couple of years. When was the last time a government initiative achieved anything like that success?
The problem is that you people are simply not rating the academies programme objectively, by the same benchmarks as other schools. For decades the unions have opposed reform to the education system, callously ignoring the plight of the millions of children stuck in failing schools that never improved. We accepted mediocrity and failure for too long, and it was only with the academies programme that meaningful change to bring that shameful situation to an end has progressed at all.