Woman glasses a man's eye, has 18 previous assaults, gets anger management classes.

i'd let her off for looking good......

Do you think most people would call the police over a threat or having a drink chucked in their face at though? Lets be real, no sane person gets 18 convictions for assault. Stop trying to make her seem innocent "oh but she could have had those when she was a teen" so? What is your point? She still hit someone. (most likely she hit. Why? Because probably only few cases ever of throwing a drink etc are actually taken to court. I don't think the court would take it seriously either, nor do I think the majority of he public know that it's assault. I imagine the jury would laugh it off and not believe the waste of time taking place.) About knowing her personally, we don't need to. If person A hits person B with a weapon and causes damage shouldn't jail just be automatic? And if person A has a history of assault convictions of a varying degree doesn't that strengthen the case for them to be jailed? Isn't that a form of ABH?

Hold up why are we still talking about the photos? I don't care. I just wanted to clarify if the black woman is the Yasmin girl because I wanted to point out that because she is black and got off she must be somewhat innocent, if it's true that black people get put away the most for the least.

And also, understand law. I major in Criminal Justice and I know how law basically works. No one said "tickling" so stop hunting for reps and I didn't say pouring drinks, I said throwing. Two totally different levels of force.

The number we've already discussed, why beat a dead horse. My opinion based on how I know the legal and penal system work is that assault isn't always punching, kicking, biting, weapons. It IS simply: threatening or making unpermitted contact with someone else's person, and that my friend, can and has included spitting and throwing drinks. We also don't know how she was penalised. Convictions ranges from community service, to probation, a stained record, must pay dues, or jail/prison. All we know is she was convicted unless you know her personally and can clarify further for me.

Especially if you're female because you can get away with a lot more before someone calls the police on you anyway.




How does her being black make her innocent? There are so many anti-racism, anti-discrimination laws here that isn't an issue. The fact is she's been giving anger management classes after 18 convictions because she's a woman. This just sends a message out to all the women in this country, "Acts of violence are okay as long as you only do it 18 times. After 18 times you'l need to take anger management classes. Just make sure you're not male mmkay?"

And the US legal system is much different from UK btw.

Sexism

Don't rofl at me >.< And I didn't say black means innocent. I said even in later posts that because of the "myth" that black people are "put away the most for the least" and she didn't get put away she must be innocent if she is black and didn't get put away. Not that she is black and therefore innocent. I never said that. Go back and read it again mister And we've soooo argued about this before, the US vs UK laws and reverse discrimination of men. Ok fine that's your stance, that's important to you, ok we'll disagree

^^I don't even give a **** anymore, how'd you find this.

You do realise that she got 18 CONVICTIONS right? That means she was already proven guilty 18 TIMES!!! How on Earth have you managed to gather from the info on this woman that she must be innocent?

I don't know what y'all are arguing about here but I'm gonna take this article pinch of salt seeing as it's The Daily Mail and every other article is fiction.

There is plenty of other places which published this article. Although i've seen some of your posts, so it comes as no shock you like so many feminists would choose to ignore this to focus on menial issues.

Lol that's rich. I am far from a feminists, in my life I more likely accused of misogyny, but I suppose up against the extremists on TSR I do look like Sinead O Connor XD.
But back on topic even though this is a unique case, everyone including femanists understand that women have advantage in the justice system but it wasn't women or femanists perpetuating the doctrine that females are WEAK and this harmless to society. That was still the mans fault.

Women being given lenient sentences is not unique to this case.

Not men of this era. Feminists who often campaign for such petty issues, whilst claiming to be for equal rights and not women>men rights, consistently ignore issues such as these. Blaming men today for women receiving lenient sentences etc. is like blaming all terrorism on Islam, ignorant,

Females have a higher pass rate on exams then men, have you ever heard someone say "you do your exam like a girl!", no?,

because it isn't relevant. To physical activity it is, and its generally an insult so not meant to be friendly.

However how a man jokingly telling his friend he runs like a girl because hes slow has somehow influenced this woman's sentence baffles me. But then the majority of what you said did.