Year 12s: what will be the first way you research your future options? >>

Duchess of Cambridge is pregnant again

Scroll to see replies

I think there will be less coverage this time since the baby won't be heir to the throne. At least I hope so. And the people waiting outside to get a glimpse of the baby last time was embarrassing.

I'm in favour of having a monarchy, but the coverage last time was excessive.

most of the coverage was ok but the days at the hospital were very slow because nothing was happening they should tell them a later date this time so they are all surprised when it comes early

Reply 41

Razzamoly

So George is getting a firmware update or something?

Reply 42

Ace123

Original post by Eva.Gregoria

Prince George is barely a year old, how will she handle it? :eek:

Well who can blame her, she has nannies to take care of the babies anyway and she doesn't need to take maternity leave if she doesn't even work. Lucky woman :unimpressed:

Posted from TSR Mobile

I am sure they can cope they have a nanny and supportive families

Reply 43

Ndella

Nothing worth shouting about. Women get pregnant every day.

Reply 44

the bear

May i offer warm congratulations to the Royal Couple on behalf of TSR.

Your loyal subjects are delighted to hear the splendid news.

:congrats:

Reply 45

Genocidal

Doesn't mean a damn thing. This one is almost certainly not going to be the monarch.

Reply 46

the bear

I hope that they choose sensible names from the Bible rather than off Reality TV or Sky Sports

Reply 47

gladders

Original post by pjm600

If you referring to my post, I was stating that the BBC coverage is tax payer funded.

So can I object whenever the BBC reports on the football or something? The BBC covers what gets it clicks and views. Sorry to say, news like this does just that.

Reply 48

gladders

Original post by bittr n swt

It was cringy before so it'll be cringy again. I don't want to read about it because I don't care but it's going to be shoved into my face.

Oooo what name will it be
Ooooo what gender
Ooooo update on morning sickness

Royal ****ing family.

Have you discovered that delightful device called a remote control for changing TV channels, or the URL bar for changing the website? Wonderful devices.

Reply 49

pjm600

Original post by gladders

So can I object whenever the BBC reports on the football or something? The BBC covers what gets it clicks and views. Sorry to say, news like this does just that.

Yes, of course you can.

All I'm saying is that many of us feel that the 'royals' coverage is ridiculous. I can say that while understanding how a business works.

Reply 50

MiddleUnderclass

Her clacker is gonna be weeping by her mid 30s.

Reply 51

MartinOnline1

Original post by MiddleUnderclass

Her clacker is gonna be weeping by her mid 30s.

What a lovely thought.

Reply 52

DaveSmith99

Original post by gladders

So can I object whenever the BBC reports on the football or something? The BBC covers what gets it clicks and views. Sorry to say, news like this does just that.

Nothing wrong with expecting the BBC to uphold some form of journalistic integrity. When George was born we had BBC correspondents camped outside both the hospital and the Middleton's family house for about 36 hours, 80%+ of airtime was devoted to the baby and they were filling it with intensely tedious topics such as 'will the Middleton's be getting the phone call by landline as I don't have any signal here' (that was genuinely one of the things reported on the BBC). If the BBC decided to devote 36 hours to camp outside Di Maria's new house in Manchester and talk about what colour he was going to paint his living room then yes you would be able to object to the football coverage.

Reply 53

bittr n swt

Original post by gladders

Have you discovered that delightful device called a remote control for changing TV channels, or the URL bar for changing the website? Wonderful devices.