Dreams and Aspirations
Shortly after Lennie makes his dream an impossibility by killing a vulnerable and needy young woman, he is met with the same fate as Candy’s faithful, old sheepdog. In many ways, the reader can infer that, like dogs, Lennie was blind and naïve to the manipulative and passive-aggressive nature of human beings. Thus, though his physical standpoint was higher than the other workers, he was ‘weak’ because of his mental immaturity and his lack of ability to control his own strength. His mental immaturity is evident from the first sentence he utters during a common conversation with George. Lennie, ‘dabbled his big paw in the water and wriggled his fingers so the water arose in little splashes’ he then looks to George for approval: ‘’look George, look what I done!’’
The duo have a dream of one day owning their own piece of land. This dream is made unrealistic by a number of factors, one is: Lennie’s inability to maintain a job without ‘doing anything bad’ long enough to ‘raise their stake’. Another being: ‘The Great Depression’ which was a result of ‘The Wall Street Crash’. Economically, it became significantly harder to find work which frustrated George. Steinbeck makes the reader feel sympathy for their dream due to its improbability. Lennie’s tendency to cause problems results in the two of them needing to leave before they can earn a ‘stake’ significant enough to make some headway in financing their dream. At this point the dream is nothing but a lullaby for Lennie.
When Candy offers to help finance the boys dream the story takes a different turn. Suddenly, there’s a chance that they could have their dream, even if it means sharing it with the aim-less old ranch handyman. Steinbeck uses the sudden hope that is planted to give the characters a sense that they have a means to an end. That they can be more than itinerant workers who ‘come to a ranch an’ work up a stake’ and then ‘blow their stake’. It also creates the illusion of a place where Lennie can be himself without the prying eyes and judgement of other people, a place they could ‘Live off the fatta’ the lan’’. This freedom could only come with their own land where: ‘if we didn’t like the guy we could just say ‘’Get the hell out!’’ and by god he’d do it’. Steinbeck uses this new found hope to change the perspective of the dream for the reader. The dream becomes noble and worthy of respect.
Curley’s wife is a prime example of the delusion what was present during ‘The Great Depression’. This is a time where it would’ve been difficult to break into acting due to the limited amount of movies that were being made during the 1930’s. Curley’s wife held onto a dream that was only a figment of her imagination. The delusion was fuelled by a vindictive man attempting to take advantage of the young girl when she was at the tender and vulnerable age of 15. The deluded fantasy that he put into her mind caused her to believe that she was ‘a natural’ actress. This caused her to believe that acting was a simple as performing a ‘small grand gesture with her arm and hand’ which she believed was sufficient enough to show she could act. Steinbeck elicits the reader to pity her deluded dreams, they were worth nothing more than pity. Curley’s wife was never willing to put in the work to attain her dreams and thus, she became bitter when her dream reached its inevitable conclusion and she married Curley.
Steinbeck created the character ‘Curley’s wife’, specifically to cause trouble for Lennie. She has no other objective. The very lack of personal characterisation that Steinbeck assigns her, underscores her very definition in this short but tragic novel. Steinbeck implemented her purely as a symbol of impending danger for Lennie, which accompanies the death of the dream. With her attention-seeking demeanour, the reader could assume that the constant need for attention could only be quenched by the shine of her fulfilled dreams of stardom. She invites Lennie, in a desperate bid to gain attention during the lonely and unsatisfactory life that she is living with Curley, to touch her soft hair. This seemingly harmless gesture is a prelude to the last moments of her life. After the death of Curley’s wife, Steinbeck elicits the reader to feel compassion and angst for the two companions because this marks the end of the dream.
It is clear by the way Steinbeck portrays this story that no one in particular is to blame for the unfortunate events that befell the two protagonists of ‘Of Mice and Men’. It was simply: ‘Something that happened’. This is a reference to the original title of the book before Steinbeck changed it to ‘Of Mice and Men’. This title in itself, which is a poem by Robert Burns, prophesizes the impending problems that the two main characters where going to face. It gives the reader a sense that disaster and broken dreams could occur throughout the story. The poem tells the reader that: ‘the best laid schemes ‘Of Mice and Men’ often gang aft agley’. This means that even the best of intentions don’t always go as planned.
Steinbeck portrays Candy as an aimless, old ranch handyman who is living on borrowed time. He is stuck on the ranch waiting until the day where he is fired. This would occur which is at a time where he can no longer be of use on the ranch. The readers can infer that Candy wanted to become a part of George and Lennie’s dream because, like George, he wishes to have the freedom to take up or set aside work as he chooses. Since the death of his loyal sheep dog, Candy sees it was a chance for him to reacquire the responsibility that he has lost for another living thing. This would be acquired by the joint responsibility that he would share with George for Lennie. The reader can infer from this that Candy feels like he is quickly losing his usefulness, just like his sheepdog.
Steinbeck links every character in a different way to the inevitable and blameless death of Lennie. He writes this story in such a way that the reader can grasp that even if each character was removed one by one and different scenarios were set in place, he would eventually attain the same fate. The only thing that could have been extended is time. Unfortunately this was still limited, due the mental illness that Lennie battled with each and every day of his life. In the end ‘the best laid schemes o’ mice an’ men often gang aft agley’.