Genocide of the unborn - Successfully proven by love life.

And many women are extremely grateful for that fact.

I will highlight the problem then:





The second quote strongly implies that you are claiming abortion is genocide.

The first quote has part of your definition of genocide as the extermination of an entire group. Abortion is not the extermination all unborns, nor is it intended to be.

Abortion is not genocide, according to your own definition. You must either revise your definition of genocide, or claim that abortion is infact the extermination of an entire group, that is, unborn children.
Can you address this please?

"Genocide" is the wrong word to use in these situations, though. It's too specific. As I said above, the etymological derivation of the word ties it unavoidably to race. "Genos" is a race.

Abortion is the systematic and planned extermination of the entire unwanted unborn ethnic group.

Black people make up many races, yet it is still genocide to kill all black people, therefore your comment is void.

Many unborn aren't.

right, we can indeed further group them as unwanted unborns. This is a very weak candidate for the "genocide" label, though, surely. You could classify all killings as genocide based on this level of classification. Prisoner execution is the killing of the entire group of people sentenced to death - do you call that genocide? What about if I kill my neighbours, who are characterised and classified by being objects of my desire to kill. Genocide?

Both of those examples or no more or less unreasonable than proposing that the killing of the group "unwanted unborn children" is genocide.

It renders the concept of genocide completely obsolete as it is doesn't tell us anything about those killed or the reasons.

How are all the unborn meant to relate to each other if they don't know each other exists?!

Are you claiming that all Jews knew each other, or are you denying the Jewish genocide of WW2.Are you claiming that all Jews knew each other, or are you denying the Jewish genocide of WW2.

OK, let's take a meritocratic approach. What does the average woman contribute to society? Could be just about anything, really, but the point is she contributes. What does the average unborn foetus contribute to society?

Leaving aside the fact that the unborn foetus is incapable, and will remain so for quite some time, of feeling gratitude.

jews knew jews, hence they had a sense of community. Do any unborns know any other unborns?

Both "black people" AND the various groups that form that overarching group are regarded as races. The same is true of all races, because all have subgroups. So it's genocide to wipe out all Koreans, as well as it being genocide to wipe out all Asians.

If you go up a step, you can add in the fact that wiping out all humans is genocide; "black", "white" and other labels then become the subgroups, and "Scandinavian", "Korean" and the rest become sub-sub-groups...

right, we can indeed further group them as unwanted unborns. This is a very weak candidate for the "genocide" label, though, surely. You could classify all killings as genocide based on this level of classification. Prisoner execution is the killing of the entire group of people sentenced to death - do you call that genocide? What about if I kill my neighbours, who are characterised and classified by being objects of my desire to kill. Genocide?

Both of those examples or no more or less unreasonable than proposing that the killing of the group "unwanted unborn children" is genocide.

It renders the concept of genocide completely obsolete as it is doesn't tell us anything about those killed or the reasons.

No, you would need to prove those cases where as a result of unwanted lives, and should you do so, you would also need to prove it was systematic and planned.

The classification I gave is perfect and although you strongly disagree, no amount of desire can change facts.

What does the average criminal do for society? What does the average rapist do for society, yet we do not even kill these, and the innocent ones you seem fit for destruction?

I think we are losing focus here, folks.

First of all, people who have killed a woman and her unborn child have been found guilty of murder on two counts - the woman and the unborn child...

...and explicit protection is extended to the unborn child in the 'International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966' and in the 'Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 1948.

I am unaware of any amendments that remove these protections.

Does that protection grant the foetus exactly the same rights as its mother?