The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Original post by WereIsSecBacon
This shouldn't be hard. While I'm perfectly capable of answering the question, I just want to check a couple of things. Am I right to say that the normal contact force at A is 0? And just what is going on at B? At every other point on the circumference, I can see that either the weight or the normal contact force caused by a component of the velocity is sufficient as a centripetal force. However at B, both the weight and the velocity aren't in the direction of the drum's walls, so I can't see how the net force can be directed towards the centre of the circle (I can't even see how there can be a contact force), help?


It's not correct to say contact f at a is 0. The sock is clinging to the wall so the contact force can be zero or more. But not enough information is given to decide which is true here. However the contact force at a is minimum.

if you consider it, the drum is rotating downwards and towards the left at point b. Weight acts downwards, so what causes the drum to move towards the left? There should be a contact force at b if weight is less than cforce. But in any case weight is not more than cf at any point since the sock clings to the walls.

The force providing centripetal force is the push of machine's wall on the sock at b.
(edited 9 years ago)
Can anyone solve this problem? I attached it here. It's from the edexcel a2 students book.
Original post by Stonebridge
If you have a specific problem related to a theory topic, it's best if you post it as a separate thread in study help. It will get lost here in a long thread. In addition, most of the senior helpers, myself included, will probably not be looking in this thread and so won't see the questions.

In addition, I've made this thread "sticky" so it will now stay at the top of the forum in a different colour and not sink down.


Hi, could you please explain why in http://qualifications.pearson.com/co...e_20110621.pdf

2 is A

and also why in http://qualifications.pearson.com/co...e_20110127.pdf

3 is B. Thanks very much in advance.
Can any really good A2 Physicists please

describe and explain the differences between the interference pattern from double-slit and diffraction grating?

Thank you in advance.

PLEASE HELP!
Original post by thebrahmabull
Can anyone solve this problem? I attached it here. It's from the edexcel a2 students book.


Did you find out how to do it? I can't work out how to answer it since it doesn't even say if it's an elastic or inelastic collision

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by thebrahmabull
Can anyone solve this problem? I attached it here. It's from the edexcel a2 students book.

Original post by BP_Tranquility
Did you find out how to do it? I can't work out how to answer it since it doesn't even say if it's an elastic or inelastic collision

p1=p2+p3 p_1=p_2+p_3
2mnE1=2mpE2+2mnE3\sqrt{2m_nE_1}=\sqrt{2m_pE_2}+ \sqrt{2m_nE_3}

Rearrange for mnm_n

Spoiler

(edited 9 years ago)
Hey can anyone help me in answering this Unit 4 question, I know the answer is C but I'm not sure how to get there? :smile:
Original post by krnwright
Hey can anyone help me in answering this Unit 4 question, I know the answer is C but I'm not sure how to get there? :smile:


Welcome to TSR physics.

It's better to post questions needing help like this one in the main Study Help section. It will get lost in this long thread.


Apply the formula for electric potential at a point a distance 40mm from a charge for both charges and add the two values you get together.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by krnwright
Hey can anyone help me in answering this Unit 4 question, I know the answer is C but I'm not sure how to get there? :smile:

Try posting it here
http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=3047347&page=48
Reply 49
In CCEA A2 Unit 1 in the topic thermal physics we have to know an equation: PV=(1/3)Nm<c^2>
But I don't know what N or m are
Is N the number of molecules?
And is m the mass of the gas?
Reply 50
Can anybody explain to me how this question should be answered and capacitor questions in general.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 51
Screen Shot 2015-05-24 at 18.35.50.png

Help!!
The emf changes direction, hence the second pulse is negative. What i don't get is why it changes direction
Reply 52
Original post by Trupac
Screen Shot 2015-05-24 at 18.35.50.png

Help!!
The emf changes direction, hence the second pulse is negative. What i don't get is why it changes direction


The coil is 'going in' at A but 'going out' at B so the emf induced should be different i.e change in direction :smile:
Reply 53
Original post by NDVA
The coil is 'going in' at A but 'going out' at B so the emf induced should be different i.e change in direction :smile:


Cheers mate!
Just did that paper but Why is there a section in the graph which has no emf induced (along the x axis) ?

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by BP_Tranquility
Just did that paper but Why is there a section in the graph which has no emf induced (along the x axis) ?

Posted from TSR Mobile


When it is in the centre of the magnet there is no change in flux so no emf induced.
Original post by iceangel8
When it is in the centre of the magnet there is no change in flux so no emf induced.


For there to be a change of flux, do the field lines have to be different spaced in front of and behind the magnet ?

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by BP_Tranquility
For there to be a change of flux, do the field lines have to be different spaced in front of and behind the magnet ?

Posted from TSR Mobile

When you are between the magnets then the magnetic field is constant so there is no changing magnetic flux to induce an emf. When you reach the end of the magnets then the magnetic field drops of as you move further away.
Don't think of it in terms of magnetic field lines
The direction of the force on a charged particle moving through a magnetic field - does it depend on whether the charge is positive or negative (i.e. positrons deflected opposite direction to electrons) are is it only dependent on the SIZE of the charge?


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 59
Original post by Rhetorical Hips
The direction of the force on a charged particle moving through a magnetic field - does it depend on whether the charge is positive or negative (i.e. positrons deflected opposite direction to electrons) are is it only dependent on the SIZE of the charge?


Posted from TSR Mobile


The direction of the force does depend on the sign (positive or negative) of the charge but it does not depend on the size of the charge. However the magnitude of the force does depend on the size of the charge (size as in +1 or +5) :smile:

Latest