Hi njbr2,
I have to say it's not currently a positive experience, to the extent that we're compiling a list of complaints.
My timetable is two consecutive days. Morning classes run 9.15 - 12.15 with a short break at a convenient point. Afternoon classes run 1 - 4, again with a break. Tutorials (such as they are, never more than 10 minutes, and never anything useful or applicable) are supposed to be an hour tagged on after the end of one afternoon session. The medicine programme is one session each of Biology, Chemistry, Physics and Maths per week. Not all the groups have timetables which run like this, and I was given the option at induction.
I would NOT advise anyone to take this course, based on their current performance. The move to City Labs has been frankly shambolic. When we arrived they didn't even have fire extinguishers in the building for the first 3 weeks. The library is some shelves in a corridor, as is the "study space". Eating and drinking anything other than water is forbidden, and there's no canteen facilities as at other campuses.This means in addition to higher parking and transport costs, we have to pay to get food locally, as there's nowhere to eat food prepared at home. The attitude of the programme leader is appalling, without being too personal, she's clearly an administrator promoted beyond her ability and gone a little power crazed (ok, that does sound quite personal, but it's my honest opinion). Instead of treating us like the mature students we are (most of us have families, work responsibilities etc) we're told we're not allowed to use certain doors, can't drink inside, and have to wear IDs at all times. Our current tutorial module (compulsory, waste of valuable time) is on how to be safe on social media. They (the organisation, not necessarily the individual tutors) treat us like kids. I've heard staff speaking to each other in reception, mocking students who asked for help and extensions (in the physics assignment the college cocked up), and the same member of staff bullying a special needs student on a different programme.
The quality of teaching is variable, and dependant on which tutors you get. I'm lucky to have an excellent Maths teacher - Nigel is the jewel in their tawdry crown. There have been serious cock-ups with graded assignments already; the wording of a physics assignment was so poor that many students didn't meet the assessment criteria, and there were spelling mistakes in both biology assessments to-date. The grading for chemistry is so complicated we don't actually know how it works. All the Biology assessment grading is subjective, based on their view of how you perform. The content is 5 units in each of the 4 subjects, cherry-picked from the A level syllabus. If you want a full list let me know and I'll type it up or scan it. I'd suggest you need A level revision guides or similar if you do this. The assessments aren't particularly difficult in terms of academic rigour, the issue is length, clarity, and understanding what they want from you to achieve the distinctions necessary for medical school admission.
There's very little support, tutorial and tutor interest (certainly in my group) doesn't exist. My group started with 18 students and there are only 11 of us left.
This is not a cheap course, and they certainly aren't giving us our money's worth at the moment. If I had my time again I'd choose a different provider, even if it meant having to move.
There's a student in my group who's a graduate and applied for a graduate programme and had an interview. They're not forthcoming with their success statistics, and not everyone on the course is applying for medicine, only 4 of my group are, which skews it further.
PGxx