The Student Room Group

Next Superpower

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Stalin
Both have considerably greater populations, considerably less debt, and by 2050 should have considerably larger economies. Consequently, they'll be able to afford considerably larger armed forces than the UK, and thus overtake it.


They already do have larger armed forces than us. So do North Korea?

We could still do them considerable damage with a few Trident warheads dropped on their main cities.
Reply 21
The current superpower is the USA.
Japan cannot be a superpower because of its energy dependence. Its economy is great but it does not have a strong military, large population and is small in size and does not have many resources.

The EU will never be a superpower because its main goal is not for world power but helping those who are members of it.

IMO china will be the next superpower.
Original post by Spandy
Which country, in your opinion is the next superpower? And why?


The EU I think. Just because it has an enormous influence in financial matters in many European countries by now. That is not to be underestimated. China may become a greater economy power than before, a circumstance what makes China to a super power automatically in my opinion.
(edited 9 years ago)
Regarding the EU should it make progress it's worth noting that it one big advantage over the countries on the list... it is extremely expansionist.

In the US it's status as a superpower is constrained by economic management.
In China it's status as a superpower will in the coming decades be constrained by demographics.
In India it's potential status is being held back by poor economic management.

The EU should at least part of it become a state (likely i think personally) does have the same issues but unlike the other three above, it is happy to expand negating the demographic issue. If it can for example get the bulk of Ukraine then that's 30+ million consumers, compare that to Poland with a slightly smaller population who's GDP has increased by around $250bn in the last decade. Turkey if it ever joins will be a trillion dollar economy. States like Morocco and Tunisia should they ever join (i personally think the smaller core free of the UK ect.. would breach the Med Sea) will be a few hundred billion each eventually.
After the United States, there will be no superpower left, because to-be a superpower goes way beyond economics. It includes political, military, cultural and even (not a popular word here, but its coming up) civilizational dominance and hegemony. None of the countries listed has anything near all of these points.

China has no ambition to be a global superpower, it wants access to global markets but its political, military and cultural ambitions do not stretch beyond East Asia. India would like to be a global superpower but its internal structural problems and the fact its got a more powerful neighbor (China) on its door step, means that they'll be unable to get beyond the status as a regional power. They are further limited by the fact that their military is tied-up in Kashmir, 20 other provinces in-which its fighting internal wars in and it has to keep an eye on both Pakistani and Chinese military build-ups. This means that the Indian State does not have free-reign to act outside its own borders, plus their economic success is not mirrored in its political structure.


I recall in 2008, when Burma was in flames and the United States tried to persuade India to intervene militarily. India was unable too, because of all the issues I have already stated. For the United States, India is a potential regional power that can help keep China in-check, but it remains to be seen if India can achieve this.


We are heading towards a world of regionalism. There will no longer be superpowers but regional ones. The Middle East its a toss up between Turkey, Iran and Saudi Arabia. In Europe it will be Germany and one other country.
Original post by MagicNMedicine
They already do have larger armed forces than us. So do North Korea?


North Korea has more personnel, but that's about it.

While China and India may lag behind the West in terms of technology and power projection, it's only a matter of time before their economic might is turned into military might.

We could still do them considerable damage with a few Trident warheads dropped on their main cities.


China and India can do the same.
Reply 26
Hey, just read an absolutely shocking stat here: A survey concluded that by 2050, @ 85tn and 80tn respectively, India will be a bigger economy than China, and the largest in the world! I'm surprised, or perhaps I'm not?
Original post by Huskaris
I think China will be the winner, largely because they are buying up Africa in huge amounts.

I predict that eventually Africa will become the world's China, the last major populace to have an industrial revolution will end up being stuck with industry and exporting in my opinion.

Africa will take time to receive huge amounts of investment (China is offering a lot, but largely in terms of agriculture, this will extend to industry, which will largely be Chinese owned) which is in most part due to the unbelievable levels of corruption/turmoil which have haunted Africa for decades.

Eventually, China will, simply through having a larger populace, which will eventually become mainly middle class, will probably win the superpower war. I just can't see India coming back...


China is investing heavily in Africa, which is creating results. The main problem with the west was giving charity to Africans rather than truly helping them.

Its like the saying: "give a man a fish, feed him for a day, teach a man to fish, feed him for a lifetime"

Sure a few western companies went in to mine, but being private corporations they had no mandate to the people and no higher goal in mind so they took what they could and left. Chinese companies are extensions of the government so they came in with both a mining mandate and a political mandate to help the country. They could partner with the established government and create wealth. Its a mutual beneficial relationship because the current government gains legitimacy by creating jobs, stability and the Chinese get a new ally and potential friend in the future.

India won't be able to beat China to become the next superpower, its actually further behind China economically and there is also the difficulties with demographics it has from muslims, hindus, and different regions whereas China is mostly Han. This can create a unifying force and benefits a country aiming to become a super power.

The US is so far ahead militarily and has so much established dominance in terms of alliances that there is in my opinion no way China will be able to become a major counterweight.

Sure if tomorrow China had a nationalist socialist government they could build up their military, but the fact remains that the US has close relations with nearly every one of China's neighbours and can essentially hem them in and China's military equipment is often several decades behind US military equipment. Technology is king, one F22 fighter undetected could shoot down as many enemy fighters as it can carry missiles before the enemy even knows they are there. If the US stopped all military development it would take a full 20 years in my opinion for China to catch up assuming they continue at their current rate of development.

On top of that, China relies heavily on the US for exports, and their people are looking to build themselves but also do not hate the US, middle class Chinese families view a western university education as the best thing for instance. Considering these middle class children will become the future leaders and decision makers I have a hard time believing they will be filled with vitriol against the West when they go back. The easiest people to brainwash against are people or culture you don't know.
(edited 9 years ago)
On top of that, China relies heavily on the US for exports, and their people are looking to build themselves but also do not hate the US, middle class Chinese families view a western university education as the best thing for instance. Considering these middle class children will become the future leaders and decision makers I have a hard time believing they will be filled with vitriol against the West when they go back. The easiest people to brainwash against are people or culture you don't know.

Any country that becomes powerful can also become aggressive and expansionist, just like every other empire in history. Expecting different from any other country is being naive.

The only difference now is we have mutually assured destruction, but what if nuclear weapons could actually be taken out of action or neutralized by one side?
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by Okorange
China is investing heavily in Africa, which is creating results. The main problem with the west was giving charity to Africans rather than truly helping them.

Its like the saying: "give a man a fish, feed him for a day, teach a man to fish, feed him for a lifetime"

Sure a few western companies went in to mine, but being private corporations they had no mandate to the people and no higher goal in mind so they took what they could and left. Chinese companies are extensions of the government so they came in with both a mining mandate and a political mandate to help the country. They could partner with the established government and create wealth. Its a mutual beneficial relationship because the current government gains legitimacy by creating jobs, stability and the Chinese get a new ally and potential friend in the future.


China also receives huge amounts of natural resources from Africa in return for improving the infrastructure. Let's keep it real: China is robbing Africa just like the West has for the last 500+ years, but it's doing so with a smile.

India won't be able to beat China to become the next superpower, its actually further behind China economically and there is also the difficulties with demographics it has from muslims, hindus, and different regions whereas China is mostly Han. This can create a unifying force and benefits a country aiming to become a super power.


China has a demographic problem of its own, though: too many men, and a really old population.
Original post by perfectsymbology
Any country that becomes powerful can also become aggressive and expansionist, just like every other empire in history. Expecting different from any other country is being naive.

The only difference now is we have mutually assured destruction, but what if nuclear weapons could actually be taken out of action or neutralized by one side?


Your assuming that aggression would be pointed in the direction of the US though. It's far more likely given territorial issues that it would be focused on their neighbors. China still claims territory in Russia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Burma, Taiwan and Japan.
Original post by Stalin
China also receives huge amounts of natural resources from Africa in return for improving the infrastructure. Let's keep it real: China is robbing Africa just like the West has for the last 500+ years, but it's doing so with a smile.



China has a demographic problem of its own, though: too many men, and a really old population.


If by robbing africa you mean investing in it then yes. You are so misguided if you think what China is doing is what Europe did to Africa for the last 100 years absolutely crazy.

I don't really care to explain it to you because you will just see for yourself in 10-15 years when the countries supported by China begin developing and the ones that rely on handouts continue with revolution after revolution.

Its happening, and Africa today is like China back in the 1970s. The last major continent to develop is Africa and I believe this century will be the century of the development of Africa, unlike the past century of turmoil, strife and the failures of colonialism.

China's demographic problem isn't as bad as you think, extra men just means more workforce of course there will be issues with finding brides but its not something that would stop the rise of a superpower.
All China needs to do to solve its demographic problem is to scrap the one child rule, and stop aborting female foetuses.

To be honest it wouldn't be surprising if the EU decides to scrap borders with Africa at some point unless there is some kind of far right resurgence.
(edited 9 years ago)
Imagine if Cecil Rhodes might have imagined one day there might be a railway line stretching from london all the way to cape town via spain.
Original post by perfectsymbology
All China needs to do to solve its demographic problem is to scrap the one child rule, and stop aborting female foetuses.

To be honest it wouldn't be surprising if the EU decides to scrap borders with Africa at some point unless there is some kind of far right resurgence.


It's birth rate has actually been dropping so while the one child rule may make a difference i'm not sure how much. In South Korea they had the same rule but scrapping it's made no difference and as a result it's the most rapidly aging country on the planet. It's currently 1.2 i think.

Proper Africa would probably be an issue but the Arab World is game for them (Morocco has actually previously applied), especially if skeptic countries like the UK leave because more power goes to the very federalist countries who'll give more power to the parliament.. it's the commission and parliament that would be quite happy to spread.
Original post by perfectsymbology
All China needs to do to solve its demographic problem is to scrap the one child rule, and stop aborting female foetuses.

To be honest it wouldn't be surprising if the EU decides to scrap borders with Africa at some point unless there is some kind of far right resurgence.


No China's demographic problems are aging, even if they stop the one child policy it wouldn't negate the fact of price inflation making it to costly for people to have children in the rich area's and in the poor area's China doesn't want more of them. One way China could change is with immigration from South East and East Asia. It could make a different, but weather of not it could change its demographic trend I am not so sure.

EU only exists so long as the member nations want it to do so. Many of their populations couldn't accept Arabs or Turks in the Union. The US didn't solve its problems with the state and federal governments until the US civil war. So like it would take an EU civil war where the EU wins for it to expand later on. My own view is that the EU will likely breakup because of German demographics.
Original post by Okorange
If by robbing africa you mean investing in it then yes. You are so misguided if you think what China is doing is what Europe did to Africa for the last 100 years absolutely crazy.

I don't really care to explain it to you because you will just see for yourself in 10-15 years when the countries supported by China begin developing and the ones that rely on handouts continue with revolution after revolution.

Its happening, and Africa today is like China back in the 1970s. The last major continent to develop is Africa and I believe this century will be the century of the development of Africa, unlike the past century of turmoil, strife and the failures of colonialism.

China's demographic problem isn't as bad as you think, extra men just means more workforce of course there will be issues with finding brides but its not something that would stop the rise of a superpower.


It isn't just China investing in Africa it is Russia, India, Turkey, Japan, Brazil and so on. The difference is that other nations try and make money out of their investments China loses money which it has been able to afford because of its export driven growth, how it doesn't mean China is actually making money, it just means turnover within the economy is increasing. GDP really is a terrible measure of the economy, I prefer net national wealth. Which the US is $320 trillion dollars, the UK is £7.2 trillion.
Have any of you lot taken a look at Kenya, Argentina or Poland?
Original post by Rakas21
It's birth rate has actually been dropping so while the one child rule may make a difference i'm not sure how much. In South Korea they had the same rule but scrapping it's made no difference and as a result it's the most rapidly aging country on the planet. It's currently 1.2 i think.

Proper Africa would probably be an issue but the Arab World is game for them (Morocco has actually previously applied), especially if skeptic countries like the UK leave because more power goes to the very federalist countries who'll give more power to the parliament.. it's the commission and parliament that would be quite happy to spread.


The UK will never leave. What else would successive governments be able to pin the blame on when the economy goes tits up, if they actually *gasp* left?

Plus the Daily Mail's circulation would plummet if they couldn't print daily stories about how immigrants are ruining Britain becaue they'd have nothing else to write about.

P.S. Also that's 400 posts. I'd like to think everyone of them was a carefully crafted piece of trolling genius in my delusional mind. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year Molly Baby.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by william walker
Have any of you lot taken a look at Kenya, Argentina or Poland?


Why do you think that these countries have the potential to come a superpower? Argentina has a financial crisis (again). Not a good starting situation to come a superpower, in financial perspective at least.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending