The Student Room Group

TSR is a forum where males are more vocal, and abuse/sexism/arrogance is rewarded?

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Anonymous
Glad I'm not the only one who feels this way, even though I haven't been here long.

Really, how do you know that? A real shame if that's the case- surely the more people here, the more interesting?


For a while there was a slight rebellion and a bunch of girls were winding up the mysogynists, but most have left now and were back to the old ways. Bashing women is clearly the accepted stance here, and God for it you speak out of place...
Original post by Anonymous
What do you think?

I have noticed that responses to most threads, apart from the degree/ offer holder/ job threads, posts start off being quite respectful, sociable and reasonable, and then the same names appear, and give their arrogant, narcissistic, self-centered, 'logical' and judgmental opinions. They are always male, always white, usually heterosexual. It's almost like a mental illness a lot of them have. I say white because most people in UK are white, and most users are from UK, and many of them have photos of themselves. But not always white(!).

I've also noticed that they tend to dominate discussions on TSR. The same few boys/ young men appear everywhere, they are abusive, rude and dismissive and literally have acquired 'legend' status because of it. Does anyone else find this disturbing. I am new to TSR, why is this? Is this a thing you all know about?

Also, I see the word sexist and misandry being used a lot, against the female posters who are brave enough to actually speak. This is something I've not encountered irl and my friendship group is mixed! Who are these boys/men? And why does everyone accept their abuse? I've literally watched threads descend into hatred, female posters being attacked for the views, or male posters saying the same thing, after abusing them, and being congratulated for their insight.

I feel like there's something I'm missing :s-smilie: Is there rule about males/females on here? Why are people so rude here?

I thought about leaving because, was quite shocked, but you can't leave.There is no deactivate button? So would love to hear from people and your views, especially posters that don't usually post at all or feel silenced.

Thanks


So you are saying the girls/young women do not do the same?

They are innocent victims?

Or when they do it, it is fine and not a something to worry about?
Original post by Twinpeaks
Precious illusions sits on the fence a lot... And so does Maid Marian, don't know where you got that from.


Can you really blame them though? When you do actually confront the prevailing attitude you get totally lain into, people start insulting your looks, messaging you insulting your intelligence and claiming you have mental health problems, creating multiple accounts to get at you, constantly put you down, read everything you've ever written to bring it up at a later date and hold you to some ridiculous standard where every slight mistake is jumped upon and seen as a mark against your character. I know, I've been there numerous times.
Original post by MagicNMedicine
I think its because society is gradually becoming more progressive, those on the fringes are lashing out and are very active on the internet as its a place they can hide and be anonymous.

In real life, if you start spouting off views about how much you hate Muslims, gay people, women, other races, poor people etc then very quickly people are going to think you are a knob. Now these people like to paint themselves as bastions of free speech sometimes by saying you should have the right to say what you want and we live in a censored world etc but actually there aren't as many laws against this as they make out. A lot of the time when someone in the public eye is forced to apologise/resign because of saying something controversial on the lines above, it's not because of any threat of legal action, it's because they get public backlash from people exercising their own right to free speech.

The implication for all the people that have those racist/homophobic/misogynistic/anti-Islamic views is that they have soon learned they can't express them in real life to people around them because they will soon lose friends. Some of these people are completely obsessed by it - you can see on internet forums like this how they start multiple threads over and over again about the same issue (usually against Islam or feminism), it is something they think about all the time. Can you imagine hanging around someone that was always talking about Islam/feminism 24/7 you would just think they were the most boring/weird obsessed person ever. If they did it in real life they would soon have no friends and be seen as a loser.

So they get forced on to the internet where they can hide their true identity and talk about it and also thats where they will find the other people that think like them who can agree with them.

TSR is not unusual to be saturated with these type of people, it's what the internet is like. Look at youtube, any video that has a significant number of comments will soon turn in to an argument about race/slavery/Ku Klux Klan or Islam v the West. Also if you find any forum that caters for a niche interest (sport, a hobby etc) if they have an 'off topic' or 'politics' subforum it is like TSR, you get some obsessed posters posting continually about how much they hate Islam or how feminism is destroying society.

Now if you look at the internet as being representative of society you can get a view that disappoints you about society but it's actually the opposite situation - the people with these kind of aggressive views feel marginalised because most people today don't agree with them in the way that in the past they might have done so they resort to being more active online.


I think society is becoming more progressive overall, but it seems like you're not allowed to say a lot of things and people resent that.

As an example, my friend told someone that gay people treat each other like dirt and that they have a lot of work to do within their own "community". He was called homophobic by that person, but my friend is gay himself! It's either all or nothing with some people regarding women, gay people, black people etc, which is ludicrous as there are faults and hypocrisies everywhere.

I do think that a lot of people spout PC language every day because they feel forced to. I don't think that what you're talking about is "fringe" at all. When people can't even voice more moderate views, they tend to become more extreme and angry. That's why support for the BNP is so high at the minute.
Original post by redferry
the constantly reoccurring 'why can't black people swim'


I've never seen one of these threads, but what's wrong with the question?

There are huge differences in swimming and drowning rates by race in the USA: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11172054 and the UK: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00mvr2t
Original post by chazwomaq
I've never seen one of these threads, but what's wrong with the question?

There are huge differences in swimming and drowning rates by race in the USA: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11172054 and the UK: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00mvr2t


It was a while back when bashing black people was in vogue. Sure ask the question but it usually escalated pretty quickly into racism.
Original post by 41b
Women wanted equality: well now you have it.

That is just so unbelievably wrong. Feminism wouldn't still exist if there was genuine equality between men and women. Women and feminists don't believe that they are better than men by any means. The entire concept of feminism is that each gender should be treated on a totally equal basis. I mean, women still to this day don't get equal pay and are faced by the glass ceiling so how is that equality?

Women are still seen as sex objects that can just be used by men. The media portrays women in such a demeaning light. Did you ever watch that video of the woman walking around New York for 10 hours? How can you even suggest that we are equal when things like that are happening every day?

And it's not just women that are being held back. Men still only get 2 weeks paternity leave and in some cases it's not even paid. Yes there is new legislation coming through, but that new law means that still means that only one parent can have the full maternity leave.

Maybe you should try looking around you and seeing all of the inequalities that women AND men both face, before degrading other users by their gender, which by the way is a fine example of inequality.
Original post by Anonymous
What do you think?

I have noticed that responses to most threads, apart from the degree/ offer holder/ job threads, posts start off being quite respectful, sociable and reasonable, and then the same names appear, and give their arrogant, narcissistic, self-centered, 'logical' and judgmental opinions. They are always male, always white, usually heterosexual. It's almost like a mental illness a lot of them have. I say white because most people in UK are white, and most users are from UK, and many of them have photos of themselves. But not always white(!).

I've also noticed that they tend to dominate discussions on TSR. The same few boys/ young men appear everywhere, they are abusive, rude and dismissive and literally have acquired 'legend' status because of it. Does anyone else find this disturbing. I am new to TSR, why is this? Is this a thing you all know about?

Also, I see the word sexist and misandry being used a lot, against the female posters who are brave enough to actually speak. This is something I've not encountered irl and my friendship group is mixed! Who are these boys/men? And why does everyone accept their abuse? I've literally watched threads descend into hatred, female posters being attacked for the views, or male posters saying the same thing, after abusing them, and being congratulated for their insight.

I feel like there's something I'm missing :s-smilie: Is there rule about males/females on here? Why are people so rude here?

I thought about leaving because, was quite shocked, but you can't leave.There is no deactivate button? So would love to hear from people and your views, especially posters that don't usually post at all or feel silenced.

Thanks


Why are these males have such trouble with women? that's the question.
Original post by redferry
Just out of interest are you a man by any chance?


Comments like these hardly aid your cause do they? Why not just ignore them?
Original post by TorpidPhil
Comments like these hardly aid your cause do they? Why not just ignore them?


Just pointing out the obvious.
Original post by redferry
Just pointing out the obvious.


That misogynist's are most likely men?

:clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:

All you're doing by pointing out such obvious things is insinuating that all men are misogynists. Now, I know you may not be doni that, but it's the impression you're giving off because why else would you be so insistent on going back to "whether someone is a man" or not?
Original post by Twinpeaks
Precious illusions sits on the fence a lot... And so does Maid Marian, don't know where you got that from.


i have a lovely fence for them both to sit on. :colondollar:
Original post by bronwencerimarsh
That is just so unbelievably wrong. Feminism wouldn't still exist if there was genuine equality between men and women. Women and feminists don't believe that they are better than men by any means. The entire concept of feminism is that each gender should be treated on a totally equal basis.

I don't agree that this is what feminism is in practice and if most of the feminists I've conversed with are anything to go by they don't intend for it to be either. Take the issue of all-female shortlists in Parliament: feminists see a problem in that there are fewer women in Parliament than men, completely ignoring the fact that far, far fewer women put themselves forward for election in the first place. They therefore introduce all-female shortlists which bar half the population from standing for election in certain constituencies on account of their gender. There is no equality in this, there is only imagined inequality and the introduction of actual inequality to combat this imagined inequality. An artificially created equality of outcome is not equality in a liberal democracy, equality of opportunity is. That equality already exists, and that is why feminism is seen as seeking female privilege rather than true gender equality.

I mean, women still to this day don't get equal pay and are faced by the glass ceiling so how is that equality?

Please cite some reliable evidence that, all else being equal, women still face a glass ceiling and do not receive equal pay.

Women are still seen as sex objects that can just be used by men. The media portrays women in such a demeaning light. Did you ever watch that video of the woman walking around New York for 10 hours? How can you even suggest that we are equal when things like that are happening every day?

What are you referring to? Are you referring to women in porn choosing of their own volition to make a living out of objectifying themselves? Are you also ignoring the fact that men are just as objectified, such as in the Diet Coke ad? This is where people spot the victim mentality of feminists, thinking the world is against them when it is not really targeting them at all.
Original post by Birkenhead
I don't agree that this is what feminism is in practice and if most of the feminists I've conversed with are anything to go by they don't intend for it to be either. Take the issue of all-female shortlists in Parliament: feminists see a problem in that there are fewer women in Parliament than men, completely ignoring the fact that far, far fewer women put themselves forward for election in the first place. They therefore introduce all-female shortlists which bar half the population from standing for election in certain constituencies on account of their gender. There is no equality in this, there is only imagined inequality and the introduction of actual inequality to combat this imagined inequality. An artificially created equality of outcome is not equality in a liberal democracy, equality of opportunity is. That equality already exists, and that is why feminism is seen as seeking female privilege rather than true gender equality.



Please cite some reliable evidence that, all else being equal
, women still face a glass ceiling and do not receive equal pay.



What are you referring to? Are you referring to women in porn choosing of their own volition to make a living out of objectifying themselves? Are you also ignoring the fact that men are just as objectified, such as in the Diet Coke ad? This is where people spot the victim mentality of feminists, thinking the world is against them when it is not really targeting them at all.
Having studied and practiced feminism for some time, yes, feminism is about being treated equal regardless of sex. And I completely agree with you that not as many women put themselves forward for election, and that's largely down to the fact that women either don't get the opportunity or feel intimidated to go into politics because they've been told it's not their place. It wasn't until fairly recently that girls have been taking politics in my school because girls have just been to scared that they can't be in a class dominated by men in a subject that people tell women they can't do.

Whilst I don't have a document proving it, because companies don't really want to show that they do it. If a man and a woman are doing exactly the same job, same workload, a man will often be given a different title to the woman, in order to be able to pay the man more. That is well known. As is women facing the glass ceiling. Women can't access top positions in a business, practically unless they created it.

Again, I agree that men are degraded as well, but no where near to the extent that women are. And when did I or any other feminist say that it was okay to show men like that? And no, it's not always by choice. When Emma Watson did her speech in the UN, the next day all of the tabloids were commenting on what she was wearing, rather than what she was saying. That was an amazing speech, so why did people feel the need to comment on what she wore? You don't see that every time Obama or Cameron make a speech, so why does it happen to women?



Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by TorpidPhil
That misogynist's are most likely men?

:clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:

All you're doing by pointing out such obvious things is insinuating that all men are misogynists. Now, I know you may not be doni that, but it's the impression you're giving off because why else would you be so insistent on going back to "whether someone is a man" or not?


I don't even know what point you are trying to make here...

Why so defensive? :s
Original post by Peaches and Cream
What I don't understand is why the guys who've never had a girlfriend start perpetuating misogyny on here anyway? With an attitude like that towards women, aren't they just reducing their chances of getting a girlfriend anyway?

I know I, and many (if not most) other girls on this forum, would never go for guys with that attitude towards women.


Well for starters there's no evidence whether they've ever had a girlfriend or not, that's just the stock insult they get.

It might sound crazy, but we men don't exist entirely for the purpose of telling girls what they want to hear in order to get laid.
Original post by bronwencerimarsh
Having studied and practiced feminism for some time, yes, feminism is about being treated equal regardless of sex. And I completely agree with you that not as many women put themselves forward for election, and that's largely down to the fact that women either don't get the opportunity or feel intimidated to go into politics because they've been told it's not their place. It wasn't until fairly recently that girls have been taking politics in my school because girls have just been to scared that they can't be in a class dominated by men in a subject that people tell women they can't do.

Whilst I don't have a document proving it, because companies don't really want to show that they do it. If a man and a woman are doing exactly the same job, same workload, a man will often be given a different title to the woman, in order to be able to pay the man more. That is well known. As is women facing the glass ceiling. Women can't access top positions in a business, practically unless they created it.

Again, I agree that men are degraded as well, but no where near to the extent that women are. And when did I or any other feminist say that it was okay to show men like that? And no, it's not always by choice. When Emma Watson did her speech in the UN, the next day all of the tabloids were commenting on what she was wearing, rather than what she was saying. That was an amazing speech, so why did people feel the need to comment on what she wore? You don't see that every time Obama or Cameron make a speech, so why does it happen to women?



Posted from TSR Mobile


I don’t see why it has to be a competition. Men are disadvantaged in some places, women in others. If feminism is about equality, as the textbooks say, why do they only ever stand up for the things which disadvantage women?

OK, we men say, you're not going to help us with the divorce courts and so on, no problem, we'll take care of it ourselves.

But then everyone interested in doing that or discussing it gets called a mouth-breathing misogynist virgin by some woman like OP making generalised attacks against men.

So we can't trust feminism to stand up for us, and we're bot allowed to stand up for ourselves; pray tell, what are we supposed to do?

Also Watson's speech was so vapid and content-free a man would have been laughed off the stage. She seemed to think involving men in feminism meant not fighting for men's issues alongside women's but for men to swoop in and dutifully help the women achieve their aims. No new ideas on show at all, nor much social awareness, only platitudes.

Not to mention a male actor, particularly not one so young, would not have even had the opportunity for some high-profile sinecure at the UN. Certainly not one that had anything to do with advancing things for men - the idea is beyond unthinkable.

The worst thing is you will probably take this as some kind of denial of the other stuff you put in your post, which I agree with completely.

(Except equal pay: those who entered the workforce since 1990 have been equally paid. The statistics are skewed by older women. Stats you see like 13 or 17 per cent pay gap are a simple average across all ages and thus completely disingenuous. By far the most important factor appears to be having babies.

Likely practices like the one you described, and the similar issue of women not being as willing to negotiate a higher salary, are balanced out by the fact that more women go to university than men. Since urban women in their 20s earn more than men, and the main factor in this is their education, it would seem they have the advantage when salaries are relatively fixed and men when negotiation becomes a thing a bit later on.)
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by 41b
even though I did nothing but stand up for men and a decent society with morals


lol

define 'decent society with morals' pls
Original post by scrotgrot
I don’t see why it has to be a competition. Men are disadvantaged in some places, women in others. If feminism is about equality, as the textbooks say, why do they only ever stand up for the things which disadvantage women?


Because where men are disadvantaged, it's because of the same factors which disadvantage women (i.e. gender roles and the whole masculine = strong, macho, provider for the family & feminine = sissy, inferior, stay-at-home mother thing). The divorce courts example you gave is a perfect example of this. Women get an easier deal because women are assumed to be the caretaker, because they are women. Equally, men asking for paternity leave never get taken seriously, because that's considered to be a 'woman's thing'. Or, along a different thread, men (generally) get much more viciously bullied at school if they show any signs of being 'feminine' or not 100% heterosexual, because any digression from being 'masculine' is seen as a weakness, and being 'feminine' is bad. And so on. The idea being that if we lose this whole perception of 'feminine' being inferior to 'masculine', through feminism, then everyone will be better off. I thought this was obvious
Original post by Birkenhead
Are you also ignoring the fact that men are just as objectified, such as in the Diet Coke ad?


Ok, I'll take your Diet Coke ad and your David Gandy M&S adverts, maybe even the Calvin Klein adverts, and raise you basically everything else in the world, including major UK newspapers (the Mail and the Sun in particular).

Next?

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending