How far is too far to go for a tinder date?

Is there a town/city midway between you which is on the train network or more easily accessible by bus? If so I would suggest to her going for a drink and seeing how it goes. The distant/lack of easy travel to where she lives isn't ideal, but it's a problem to worry about if it seems like there's potential between you both. I'd meet her first, see how it goes, and worry about the logistical aspect later.

If you're not drowning in right-swipes, might as well go for it - but you're nuts if you don't reduce your discovery radius.

For the first date, I would suggest meeting her in a city halfway between hers and yours. Then if you really click you could both start making an effort.

Cheers man. The problem is the thing works in a circle. Theres a huge city 25 miles away packed with students, and its like a 15 minute train journey away. So I set my radius big enough to cover the outskirts of that.

Hey guys/girls.

I've been talking to a girl on tinder for the past few days and have got her number. She seems fairly into me, given a) the fact we matched, b) the fact she initiated the conversation, and c) the fact that she gave me her number when I asked. I think she's quite attractive, and we have a fair amount in common - musically, cynically, artistically (wow that sounds pretentious) ect ect...

I'm fairly sure if I asked out for drinks she'd say yes. The only issue is distance - I set my radius to 30 miles, but I don't drive, she lives somewhere not on the train network, and a bus would take 1hr 40 minutes to get to her town. If I was a guy inundated with girls wanting to date me, this would be a no brainer, but I've been pretty unsuccessful on that front throughout my life - I guess this is what you'd call my first proper date, so to turn the opportunity down purely because of distance seems a little anti-climatic.

What are you're thoughts everyone?

Why don't you skype date first? Tbh skype is just as awkward as meeting irl so it'd give you a good indication if whether you should bother to meet up.

I live in a capital city so I wouldn't travel outside the city for a date. The way I see it is that I live in the most convenient area so if she lives outside the capital then the onus is on her to travel. I would do it if I was the one living outside the capital.

Hell, that's why anyone lives in the capital right? So they don't have to travel.

I'm not sure it would be right to play the "you're from a more obscure area than me so you should come here card" given that it would be me suggesting the meetup in the first place.

Hey guys/girls.

I've been talking to a girl on tinder for the past few days and have got her number. She seems fairly into me, given a) the fact we matched, b) the fact she initiated the conversation, and c) the fact that she gave me her number when I asked. I think she's quite attractive, and we have a fair amount in common - musically, cynically, artistically (wow that sounds pretentious) ect ect...

I'm fairly sure if I asked out for drinks she'd say yes. The only issue is distance - I set my radius to 30 miles, but I don't drive, she lives somewhere not on the train network, and a bus would take 1hr 40 minutes to get to her town. If I was a guy inundated with girls wanting to date me, this would be a no brainer, but I've been pretty unsuccessful on that front throughout my life - I guess this is what you'd call my first proper date, so to turn the opportunity down purely because of distance seems a little anti-climatic.

What are you're thoughts everyone?