The Student Room Group

The world’s most famous “Holocaust deniers”

This is a list of the world’s most famous but often not acknowledged “Holocaust deniers”:

Winston Churchill - never made any reference to it, not even in memoirs Holocaust Denier on the same basis that David Irving is for “not mentioning it”.
Charles de Gaulle - never made any reference to it, not even in memoirs Holocaust Denier on the same basis that David Irving is for “not mentioning it”.
Dwight D. Eisenhower - never made any reference to it, not even in memoirs Holocaust Denier on the same basis that David Irving is for “not mentioning it”.
The International Red Cross whose reports from people who visited German camps do not match up to the Holocaust stories (apologised for “Holocaust denial” in the 1990s)
The International Tracing Service
Dr. Charles Larson The United States Chief Forensic Pathologist who investigated 20 German camps in 1945

Scroll to see replies

Well Churchill and Eisenhower sort of died before the term came to be used in a mainstream way.
Reply 2
George Lincoln Rockwell
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
Mahmoud Abbas
David Duke
David Cole
Reply 3
Original post by Izzyeviel
Well Churchill and Eisenhower sort of died before the term came to be used in a mainstream way.


No, the point is they never referred to the events known as the "Holocaust" never mind the term.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Ccomp
No, the point is they never referred to the events known as the "Holocaust" never mind the term.


Posted from TSR Mobile


Except they did. They may not have used the word holocaust but they did acknowledge the atrocities.
Reply 5
Original post by Izzyeviel
Except they did. They may not have used the word holocaust but they did acknowledge the atrocities.


What they acknowledged was in line with the British Ministry of Information & Alfred Hitchcock Bergen Belsen reel from 1945 showing starving, diseased and dying people in the camps in the thousands during the last days. They never acknowledged millions killed by gas chambers.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Ccomp
What they acknowledged was in line with the British Ministry of Information & Alfred Hitchcock Bergen Belsen reel from 1945 showing starving, diseased and dying people in the camps in the thousands during the last days. They never acknowledged millions killed by gas chambers.


Posted from TSR Mobile


Republicans in America don't acknowledge evolution - does that mean it never happened? They don't acknowledge global warming either - does that mean we don't have to worry the future?
Reply 7
Churchill after receiving reports of the atrocities happening at Auschwitz wrote...

There is no doubt this is the most horrible crime ever committed in the whole history of the world, and it has been done by scientific machinery by nominally civilised men in the name of a great State and one of the leading races of Europe. It is quite clear that all concerned in this crime who may fall into our hands, including the people who only obeyed orders by carrying out the butcheries, should be put to death after their association with the murders has been proved.
Reply 8
Original post by Izzyeviel
Republicans in America don't acknowledge evolution - does that mean it never happened? They don't acknowledge global warming either - does that mean we don't have to worry the future?


Evolution and global warming are unproven theories. They don't need to acknowledge them.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Ccomp
Evolution and global warming are unproven theories. They don't need to acknowledge them.


Posted from TSR Mobile


So you don't believe in evolution or global warming? What about gravity?
There are no holocaust deniers, just holocaust fundamentalists.
Reply 11
Original post by Swanbow
Churchill after receiving reports of the atrocities happening at Auschwitz wrote...


That quote is from July 1944 mid war. Every possible reason to refer to German swine and Hitler swine was used during the war. There was a rumour at time of such goings on. It was dismissed as war propaganda.

Did Churchill take it seriously enough to refer to it in an official meeting or put it in his memoirs?


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 12
Original post by Izzyeviel
So you don't believe in evolution or global warming? What about gravity?


Objects tend to float down or put more scientifically, in our universe, matter attracts matter. Empirical observation will prove this repeatedly therefore gravity is a scientific fact.

How can there be global warming right now when we are in a period of global cooling?

How can there be a solid case for global warming when the temperature has simply followed the same oscillations that it has for the last 2,000 years. Request that you find a 2,000+ year temperature chart and take a look.

Evolution: refer to "the missing link".




Posted from TSR Mobile
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by Ccomp
Objects tend to float down or put more scientifically, in our universe, matter attracts matter. Empirical observation will prove this repeatedly therefore gravity is a scientific fact.

How can there be global warming right now when we are in a period of global cooling?

How can there be a solid case for global warming when the temperature has simply followed the same oscillations that it has for the last 2,000 years. Request that you find a 2,000+ year temperature chart and take a look.

Evolution: refer to "the missing link".




Posted from TSR Mobile


[video="youtube;cjuGCJJUGsg"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjuGCJJUGsg[/video]
Original post by Ccomp
That quote is from July 1944 mid war. Every possible reason to refer to German swine and Hitler swine was used during the war. There was a rumour at time of such goings on. It was dismissed as war propaganda.

Did Churchill take it seriously enough to refer to it in an official meeting or put it in his memoirs?


Posted from TSR Mobile


He thought it seriously enough to write to the foreign secretary about it.

For reference it was written as a reply to the report from George Mantello, published June 1944, on the squalid conditions of the Jewish ghettos in Hungary, the deportations and death camp at Auschwitz-Birkenau. After which there was serious debate about bombing Auschwitz.
Original post by Ccomp
What they acknowledged was in line with the British Ministry of Information & Alfred Hitchcock Bergen Belsen reel from 1945 showing starving, diseased and dying people in the camps in the thousands during the last days. They never acknowledged millions killed by gas chambers.


Posted from TSR Mobile


I'm not sure what the numbers are, but I don't think that anyone thinks that "millions" were killed in gas chambers. The 6 million figure is total deaths, not gas chamber deaths.
Reply 16
Original post by Izzyeviel
[video="youtube;cjuGCJJUGsg"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjuGCJJUGsg[/video]


The Wall Street Journal does not support this comedians position that 97% of scientists support the theory of man made global warming. They infer that it was picked out of a hat. Many statistics are picked out of hats, I'd say it was about oh 6 million.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303480304579578462813553136


Posted from TSR Mobile
(edited 9 years ago)
Not surprised you don't understand the evidence for global warming either; you prefer fantasy land to reality, it would be ok if you were an experienced poet, but you're just a sad little man.
Reply 18
Original post by james22
I'm not sure what the numbers are, but I don't think that anyone thinks that "millions" were killed in gas chambers. The 6 million figure is total deaths, not gas chamber deaths.


Well the commonly stated figure for Auschwitz was 4 million till some people started doing the maths and working out that they would still be incinerating bodies today with that quantity. Now it's they packed people in those gas chambers so tight the doors nearly came off.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Ccomp
Objects tend to float down or put more scientifically, in our universe, matter attracts matter. Empirical observation will prove this repeatedly therefore gravity is a scientific fact.

How can there be global warming right now when we are in a period of global cooling?

How can there be a solid case for global warming when the temperature has simply followed the same oscillations that it has for the last 2,000 years. Request that you find a 2,000+ year temperature chart and take a look.

Evolution: refer to "the missing link".




Posted from TSR Mobile


Not sure if troll...


Or actually that stupid.

Quick Reply

Latest