Is being boring immoral?

I guess this thread is imposing on my rights to be entertained

No.

Just because something is disagreeable, doesn't mean it's immoral.

It is disagreeable to burn my money rather than give it to charity, but that isn't immoral.

Is it not?

No. It makes me a bit of a dick, but it isn't immoral. It's my property to dispose of as I see fit.

It is your property, and the act of charity is entirely voluntary, nonetheless what is the distinction between an act that is disagreeable and one that is immoral?

Whether or not you're breaching a duty you owe or infringing on a right someone else has.

You don't owe a duty to anyone to be interesting.

No. It makes me a bit of a dick, but it isn't immoral. It's my property to dispose of as I see fit.

I think it's illegal to destroy currency.

Since most of us would disagree that being boring is an agreeable trait, and traits that are not agreeable are usually considered immoral, of course it is not a grave act, but nonetheless do you still consider it ethically wrong?

There is of course a degree of education and relativity, as with the case of classical music, many find that boring whereas i'd simply dismiss it as ignorance, however in some cases there is a genuine ground to call something boring.