Why do people act like it's impossible for a woman to rape a man?

When did I say that this post is kind of bizarre.

Being able to perform doesn't mean consent so I don't get your point.

This is the problem. Similar does not equal the same. And I'd argue that the sentence is actually a lot less, as women don't tend to be vilified in the media when convicted of 'sexual assault' as when a man is convicted of rape. They serve their prison sentence and she can then start her life over, whereas men generally cannot, even if fully rehabilitated and remorseful of their crime.

Well you said:
'Yet it's like if the roles are reversed its not a real offense.'
Why are you spreading that message? Its junk...

No, but being able to perform is going to be hindered by being paraletic.

If the guy can't perform it'll be tricky for the woman to rape him.

So occurances in the situation are likely to be lower.

As marshmallow said, in the eyes of UK law, a woman cannot commit rape since it is the act of "penetration", be it vaginally, anally or orally. Since a woman does not have a penis, she cannot legally be classed as a rapist.

Sexual assault however can be committed by both males and females, and therefore a woman may still be tried in court with similar severity to that of a rape crime.

Only sexists and feminazi will say that 'men can't be raped'.
Society is ignoring the issue because it doesn't happen that often and because again, the sexist approach: women are sexual prey while men are sexual predators.

I always wondered though if both people are drunk. Then how come the man still gets charged with rape and not the woman?

I don't know why include feminists as they are usually the ones trying to convince the society that yes, men can be raped... :P

But yeah, no need to include penetration or a penis as a necessary part of rape, like I don't want to be graphic but I can think of many things that one could be forced to do that are sexual, nasty and non-penetrative...

Only sexists and feminazi will say that 'men can't be raped'.

Though it's categorised as "sexual assault" because (cis) women don't have penises, a conviction would carry similar punishment/time to a man convicted of rape, as far as I'm aware. (Any law folks who can weigh in on this?)

Personally I think it's important to discuss men's issues like the "toxic masculinity" which says "men always want sex, men can't be victims of rape" without trying to sabotage the increasing progressiveness of our understanding of women's rape...

I thought it wasn't considered rape because a man becoming erect denotes arousal and this consent.

👆 might be out dated though!


Ps I agree it should be gender neutral. However that won't do much for the actual number of rapes against women occurring.

It's funny that you say that, because the 'feminazi' I know are the ones who won't shut up about how gender roles are harmful for everybody, especially in that....

Can you give me one example where this has happened, because I have NEVER heard of this before?

If both people are drunk, then both people are drunk. A lot of fun and/or deadly embarrassing nights were born that way.

If person A sees a hopelessly drunk person B, and then somehow decides that having sex with that person while they're barely-conscious is a good idea, then that's an act of sexual assault. Idgaf which person has a willy. That ****'s just not right

I've heard people say if a woman is really drunk she can't consent end of story without considering the man may have been in the same state. And never have heard it be indicated that if a man is really drunk he can't consent the same statement is rarely used its focused on the woman.

To rape a man requires that his penis be erect.

His penis will not be erect if he is being raped.

It is impossible to rape a man.

As marshmallow said, in the eyes of UK law, a woman cannot commit rape since it is the act of "penetration", be it vaginally, anally or orally. Since a woman does not have a penis, she cannot legally be classed as a rapist.

Sexual assault however can be committed by both males and females, and therefore a woman may still be tried in court with similar severity to that of a rape crime.