The Student Room Group

"Brealfies" and the rise of public breastfeeding.

Scroll to see replies

Original post by SophieSmall
Breast pumps are expensive, and you need to on average pump every 3 hours. At some point you're going to have to do it at an inconvenient time, possibly in public.


But an option nonetheless. That being the point.
Also how is it fair that if I wanted to bring in a Maccy D's and eat it at the restaurant I can't, but a baby gets to eat non-restaurant food? Double standards. I just want equality.
*shrug*

I like boobs and if a baby is hungry then go for it?

I suppose it'd be nice for mothers to be a bit more discreet about it and not rub it into people's faces, but it'd also be nice for people to be a bit more understanding of a child's need for num-nums from mummy's fun-funs.


All in all it's a bit of a non-issue.

I don't get selfies, they're pretty self-absorbed and pointless in most cases but then again I don't have to look at them.

Yeah, nothing to see here, everyone go home.
Since the Equality Act 2010 people are doing this purely because they can. If urinating in public was included there would be a minority who will do it purely because they can, common decency doesn't come into it.
Not all babies will drink from a bottle. It's not as simple as you lot make out.
Reply 45
Original post by Heliosphan
But an option nonetheless. That being the point.

Expressing is not the same as a baby sucking on a boob. I've seen mothers describe a situation where they would have to be pumping non-stop to get enough for a day's feed. And as OU Student says, many exclusively breast-fed babies will not take a bottle. You risk preventing a baby from ever taking breast again if you start bottle-feeding, too.
Original post by Ronove
Expressing is not the same as a baby sucking on a boob. I've seen mothers describe a situation where they would have to be pumping non-stop to get enough for a day's feed. And as OU Student says, many exclusively breast-fed babies will not take a bottle. You risk preventing a baby from ever taking breast again if you start bottle-feeding, too.



This thread is just full of people who think their very brief and mild discomfort is more important than a baby being able to eat, and people who clearly have no idea what raising a baby is like and how it's not black and white. No point even conversing with most of them.
Original post by A Mysterious Lord
Since the Equality Act 2010 people are doing this purely because they can. If urinating in public was included there would be a minority who will do it purely because they can, common decency doesn't come into it.


Well why shouldn't they?

Why are you all comparing defecating and what not to feeding a baby. It is not at all comparable.

The fact so many seem to treat a mum breast feeding the same as her jumping up on your table and taking a massive dump on your plate say a lot...

Original post by Wahrheit
Also how is it fair that if I wanted to bring in a Maccy D's and eat it at the restaurant I can't, but a baby gets to eat non-restaurant food? Double standards. I just want equality.


I find it really hard to tell if posts like these are sarcastic or genuine :hmmmm:
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by KingStannis
This whole hate for breast feeding mothers only started happening five minutes ago when it was decided five minutes ago that being discrete when breast feeding wasn't just normal manners. Funny that.


No it didn't.

It's always been a thing people find offensive.
Original post by ChaoticButterfly
No it didn't.

It's always been a thing people find offensive.


Yet, they have no issue with Page 3 and the like... :rolleyes:
Original post by ChaoticButterfly
No it didn't.

It's always been a thing people find offensive.


Yeah, people have always found not being discrete about it offensive. It's only recently though that taking your breasts out fully and dangling them in front of everyone instead of under a blanket or shirt, which is the common sense solution, has been the norm. There's no NEED to not do it discretely.
Original post by KingStannis
Yeah, people have always found not being discrete about it offensive. It's only recently though that taking your breasts out fully and dangling them in front of everyone instead of under a blanket or shirt, which is the common sense solution, has been the norm. There's no NEED to not do it discretely.



It's not even remotely close to the norm, and if you think it is then you clearly have not been paying attention to your surroundings. You might want to go outside some time.
Original post by OU Student
Yet, they have no issue with Page 3 and the like... :rolleyes:


People who would be offended probably would be offended by page 3. Also, there is no conflict between finding breast nudity okay in porn but not okay when you're out having a meal.

I personally don't mind it. In fact if a woman has her breasts brazenly out for whatever reason I consider it a matter of public duty to look as a show of support. And because i like woman's nipples.
Original post by SophieSmall
It's not even remotely close to the norm, and if you think it is then you clearly have not been paying attention to your surroundings. You might want to go outside some time.


Under the shirt is the routine maneuver I've seen. And if for practical reasons the mother can't do that, it's sensible to cradle the baby in a way that hides the breast from full view, another sensible maneuver. This whole thing where nobody should be offended if both breasts are pointlessly out in an indiscreet manner is silly. And from what I've seen, women mostly do it publicly when a private place is not convenient to get to. In a restaurant, it is perfectly reasonable to go to the bathrooms and do it.
Original post by KingStannis
Under the shirt is the routine maneuver I've seen. And if for practical reasons the mother can't do that, it's sensible to cradle the baby in a way that hides the breast from full view, another sensible maneuver. This whole thing where nobody should be offended if both breasts are pointlessly out in an indiscreet manner is silly. And from what I've seen, women mostly do it publicly when a private place is not convenient to get to. In a restaurant, it is perfectly reasonable to go to the bathrooms and do it.


You do realise you just reiterated my point that your claim that just whipping your breasts out is the norm now (as opposed to discretion) is complete nonsense?
Original post by KingStannis
Yeah, people have always found not being discrete about it offensive. It's only recently though that taking your breasts out fully and dangling them in front of everyone instead of under a blanket or shirt, which is the common sense solution, has been the norm. There's no NEED to not do it discretely.


Which is what people do, yet get flack for doing it. But the act involves breasts. Even if you can see her nipples so what?

My mum has lots of stories of knobs when she had me as a baby. All 22 years ago. We need stuff like equality acts since people are dick heads.

I'm aware this is a dangerously close to being a feminist issue for you. :ahee:
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by SophieSmall
You do realise you just reiterated my point that your claim that just whipping your breasts out is the norm now (as opposed to discretion) is complete nonsense?


The bit you quoted refers to the part about women not being discrete being the norm.b
Original post by KingStannis
People who would be offended probably would be offended by page 3. Also, there is no conflict between finding breast nudity okay in porn but not okay when you're out having a meal.



Not really. It's quite common for blokes to be fine with page 3 but find breast feeding in a restaurant offensive.

The sort of people on here defending the the perceived right of the establishment owner to ban breast feeding will be the same people to defend page 3 existence.
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by KingStannis
The bit you quoted refers to the part about women not being discrete being the norm.b


Which as you then stated clearly is not the case.

As the norm is quite clearly women being discrete.

Do you even read your own posts? This really shouldn't be confusing.
Original post by KingStannis
Under the shirt is the routine maneuver I've seen. And if for practical reasons the mother can't do that, it's sensible to cradle the baby in a way that hides the breast from full view, another sensible maneuver. This whole thing where nobody should be offended if both breasts are pointlessly out in an indiscreet manner is silly. And from what I've seen, women mostly do it publicly when a private place is not convenient to get to. In a restaurant, it is perfectly reasonable to go to the bathrooms and do it.


I completely disagree with this. My discreet is different from your discreet it would seem.

She shouldn't have to hide her breasts like you describe. It's ridiculous. If she doesn't want to. People can be offended if they like but tough ****. That's there problem, not the mothers. Nipples visible or not.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending