Resolution 2006/35: Abolishment of the Human Rights Council

Thanks Nightowl

BTW is the forum universally visible, I know I can now see it but that might just be because I'm supposed to be modding it. I have mentioned in AAM that at some point I wanted the access masks removed but I haven't received any conformation that it's happened.

I would like to stress that if this resolution passes I won't let the sub forum go to waste. With the approval of the GA I would have admin convert it into a resolution forum, like the one Teehar suggested we should have to much popular support.

Reply 2

Apollo

11

The forum should be visible to all now.

Reply 3

gemgems89

15

Israel remains neutral on the situation but has noticed the forum remaining mostly inactive. Israel would support a resolution forum were it to be put forward.

Reply 4

Great

Debate away everyone, I don't see any reason to send this to the security council after the GA vote which is convenient since we only have half an SC at present.

Reply 5

Knogle

Yes please. I have always been against the establishment of this forum, and today it continues its dismal showing. The idea in itself may be good, but we simply do not have the resources to sustain this model.

Reply 6

A Y A Z

11

U.A.E remains neutral.

Reply 7

Nutter

Australia supports the abolishment of a forum just for the HRC and sees more value in it being converted into a database for all our resolutions, but wishes to remind the international community that we remain completely focused and stalwart in our defence of human dignity, human rights and democracy around the world.

Reply 8

Nightowl

OP

12

Apollo

The forum should be visible to all now.

Nope, I can't see it.

Reply 9

Nutter

Nightowl

Nope, I can't see it.

FYI Nightowl this should be Resolution 2006/35. Resolution 34 on Human Rights Violations in Myanmar has been temporarily put on hold in view of the SG change and the coming changes in the Security Council.

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=316139

Reply 10

Nightowl

OP

12

Okay no problem, missed that :smile:

If the SG would change the title it would be great.

Reply 11

Nutter

Nightowl

Okay no problem, missed that :smile:

If the SG would change the title it would be great.

You can do it yourself. On the main MUN forum index, double-click the area just to the right of this thread's title. A textbox will appear which allows you to easily edit the titles of threats which you have created. Once the changes are done, just click anywhere outside the box for them to be saved.

Reply 12

Red Thunder

9

Pakistan is Neutral on the situation

Reply 13

Marcods

South Africa supports this motion. Whilst in theory the HRC was a good idea, in practice it seems not to have fulfilled its intended function.

I assume Human Rights resolutions will now pass through the SC like all other resolutions?

Reply 14

Marcods

South Africa supports this motion. Whilst in theory the HRC was a good idea, in practice it seems not to have fulfilled its intended function.

I assume Human Rights resolutions will now pass through the SC like all other resolutions?

Correct.

Reply 15

paddy

The Czech Republic for now remains neutral on the subject.
Indeed the Czech Republic cannot actually see any such subforum.

Reply 16

Knogle

*watches the rampant human rights violators lobby for the abolishment of the council* :p:

Reply 17

Agent Smith

11

Belarus notes the almost total inactivity of the TSR MHRC and would like to ask whatever country Knogle is representing precisely what good the MHRC is doing, and what benefits would be lost were it to be abolished.

Reply 18