US judge allows 'Muslims killing Jews' ads on buses

I know they have a choice but what I find disturbing is the advertisement is labelling Muslim countries as aid unworthy based on what is written in a book that it's people follow. I believe the aid should be used to help ordinary Muslim individuals/families who have lost their homes and are struggling to get enough food/water to support themselves or their families. If the western countries are aware that their money will be misused by Islamist authorities and there is no way to avoid it then they can justify their stoppage of aid to these countries but that's a different matter, one in which my argument wasn't focused on but fine, if the money sent will lead to further oppression/wrongdoings then they can decide not to send the aid. Aid can come from other nations anyway.

'but lets reverse this do you think muslims would be happy if they found out their money was going to a charity that promoted sexual equality and equal rights for a countries LGBT community? Do you think they should be able to chose where the money they give as ALMS actually goes? '

I think the issue is apparent misleading nature of the ad. It says antisematism is in the quran yet doesn't quote the Quran it quotes a muslims, it then goes on to say that aid to islamic nations should be stopped due to this antisematism which Implies all islamic nations support antisematism.

Do you disagree that the Koran contains anti-Semitic material?

here is the definition of incitement for the UK

Incitement was an offence under the common law of England and Wales. It was an inchoate offence.[1] It consisted of persuading, encouraging, instigating, pressuring, or threatening so as to cause another to commit a crime.

Now the statement '"Killing Jews is Worship that draws us close to Allah" is incitement and this is a given but how does someone reporting that this has been said also guilty of incitement

who are they persuading, encouraging, instigating, pressuring, or threatening so as to cause another to commit a crime?

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/04/judge-muslims-killing-jews-ads-buses-150422013416574.html

Personally, I dont know how this is somehow protected. Would they be OK with people saying "Oh look the Talmud has some stuff that could be used for hate. Therefore all Jews are x?" especially as this advert is from an anti Muslim group?

Equally, as the judge has now ruled that you CAN basically say what you want(ie: including hate speech), so long as it's in advertising, isn't that just a major loophole for people who want to lynch Muslims, Jews, Gays etc.. ? Like now any hate organisation can just get around the whole hate speech thing by advertising instead (Provided they have the money for that)

Aaaargh. This group... It's like they want all Muslims to be like Hamas so they can say "Look I told you so. I told you all Muslims are evil"

So you ignore the real hate speech and incitement to violence 'killing Jews' and focus on the 'That's his Jihad. What's yours?!

'That's his Jihad. What's yours? '

You need to explain what part of this is persuading, encouraging, instigating, pressuring, or threatening so as to cause another to commit a crime?

Also this tag line was used by a muslim organisation in the US so when they used it was it also instigating violence?

Not hate speech but a bad idea.

Why is it a bad idea?

I think dangerous idea was a better description.

Well if we anger the Islamists enough, it won't be long till there's another Charlie Hebdo.

So, we should just keep our mouth shut to appease the real barbarians - that's what you are saying?

Have you ever heard of heckler's veto? That's precisely what you are asking for, and I think THAT IS DANGEROUS - because, according to you, all you need to suppress free speech is threat of violence.

I'm not a big fun of Islam and Muslims, but consider such ads inappropriate. Public transport should not be a forum of interfaith debates.

Didn't say jack about muslims - it said something about islam.

What is hate speech? Speech that you don't like?

Didn't say jack about muslims - it said something about islam.

What is hate speech? Speech that you don't like?

Irreverent what they are saying is they can decide who get's their aid.

Do you not think this is right? but lets reverse this do you think muslims would be happy if they found out their money was going to a charity that promoted sexual equality and equal rights for a countries LGBT community? Do you think they should be able to chose where the money they give as ALMS actually goes?

That doesn't attack Islam at all. It implies all Muslims are violent. Not the same

No it doesn't.. doesn't even mention mulsim. It's says "islamic hatred for jews is in quran". It will be true EVEN if there are no muslims in the world.