The Student Room Group

Can someone help me???

This should be simple but I am really struggling. can you explain why the answer is 22m/s and 38 degrees??,image.jpg
Add the two vectors on the diagram by putting them end to end (making sure they're at the correct angles) and drawing a line from the start of the first vector to the end of the last vector, this is the total velocity.
Original post by Abby5001
This should be simple but I am really struggling. can you explain why the answer is 22m/s and 38 degrees??,image.jpg
Not enough information provided.

You need to post the whole question for a definitive answer. It's pretty certain this is a vector addition problem, but without all of the information it's guesswork to try and answer you.
Original post by uberteknik
Not enough information provided.

You need to post the whole question for a definitive answer. It's pretty certain this is a vector addition problem, but without all of the information it's guesswork to try and answer you.


There is enough information; draw the first vector at 65 degrees and then the next one horizontal to the page (like in the diagram) joining on to it at the correct magnitudes.
Reply 4
image.jpg
Original post by uberteknik
Not enough information provided.

You need to post the whole question for a definitive answer. It's pretty certain this is a vector addition problem, but without all of the information it's guesswork to try and answer you.
Original post by Abby5001
image.jpg


Thanks. :smile:

Ignoring the river velocity for a moment, if the new boat heads off at 1.5 m/s at an angle of 65o to the riverbank, then resolving the horizontal and vertical components produces:

horizontal velocity=1.5cos(65)=0.634 m/s\mathrm{horizontal \ velocity} = 1.5cos(65) = 0.634 \mathrm{\ m/s}

vertical velocity=1.5sin(65)=1.36 m/s\mathrm{vertical \ velocity} = 1.5sin(65) = 1.36 \mathrm{\ m/s}

This is in addition to the river velocity of 1.1 m/s

i.e. the boat must actually travel at

1.36 m/s across the river and,

1.1 + 0.634 = 1.734 m/s downstream

Combining these produces the resultant velocity of:

(1.362+1.7342)=2.2 m/s\sqrt{(1.36^2 + 1.734^2)} = 2.2 \mathrm{\ m/s}

at an angle of:

θ=tan11.361.734=38o\theta = tan^{-1}\frac{1.36}{1.734} = 38^o
Reply 6
Original post by uberteknik
Thanks. :smile:

Ignoring the river velocity for a moment, if the new boat heads off at 1.5 m/s at an angle of 65o to the riverbank, then resolving the horizontal and vertical components produces:

horizontal velocity=1.5cos(65)=0.634 m/s\mathrm{horizontal \ velocity} = 1.5cos(65) = 0.634 \mathrm{\ m/s}

vertical velocity=1.5sin(65)=1.36 m/s\mathrm{vertical \ velocity} = 1.5sin(65) = 1.36 \mathrm{\ m/s}

This is in addition to the river velocity of 1.1 m/s

i.e. the boat must actually travel at

1.36 m/s across the river and,

1.1 + 0.634 = 1.734 m/s downstream

Combining these produces the resultant velocity of:

(1.362+1.7342)=2.2 m/s\sqrt{(1.36^2 + 1.734^2)} = 2.2 \mathrm{\ m/s}

at an angle of:

θ=tan11.361.734=38o\theta = tan^{-1}\frac{1.36}{1.734} = 38^o


thankyou so much!!! I really appreciate it😀😀
Original post by Discipulus
There is enough information; draw the first vector at 65 degrees and then the next one horizontal to the page (like in the diagram) joining on to it at the correct magnitudes.
Yes of course, it was me misreading the question!
Reply 8
Another question I am struggling with. why would you do cos65 when the angle the 25 degrees to the horizontal
Original post by Abby5001
Another question I am struggling with. why would you do cos65 when the angle the 25 degrees to the horizontal


We need to resolve the forces acting on the geologist (in a similar way to resolving the velocity components of the last example) using a reference that puts the forces at right angles to each other and in the direction the geologist must travel up the slope.





Since the geologist is on a mountain slope and not on horizontal ground, he can only move up the slope (hypotenuse), so the forces of gravity and friction need to be resolved. There are two resolved component forces acting at right angles: - the normal force perpendicular to the slope and the frictional force parallel to the slope.

Using the trigonometry rules, we can draw the graphical representation of the force magnitudes and directions:




At this point, we need to introduce the trigonometry rules for the angles of similar triangles. Notice where theta occurs (three places but only two shown explicitly in the diagram above).

Notice that the actual force of gravity acts vertically downwards so the magnitude of that force is given by:

Fg=mgF_g = mg

Which makes the normal (to the slope) perpendicular component force:

Fn=FgCosθF_n = F_gCos\theta

And the frictional parallel (to the slope) component force:

Ff=FgSinθF_f = F_gSin\theta
Reply 10
Original post by uberteknik
We need to resolve the forces acting on the geologist (in a similar way to resolving the velocity components of the last example) using a reference that puts the forces at right angles to each other and in the direction the geologist must travel up the slope.





Since the geologist is on a mountain slope and not on horizontal ground, he can only move up the slope (hypotenuse), so the forces of gravity and friction need to be resolved. There are two resolved component forces acting at right angles: - the normal force perpendicular to the slope and the frictional force parallel to the slope.

Using the trigonometry rules, we can draw the graphical representation of the force magnitudes and directions:




At this point, we need to introduce the trigonometry rules for the angles of similar triangles. Notice where theta occurs (three places but only two shown explicitly in the diagram above).

Notice that the actual force of gravity acts vertically downwards so the magnitude of that force is given by:

Fg=mgF_g = mg

Which makes the normal (to the slope) perpendicular component force:

Fn=FgCosθF_n = F_gCos\theta

And the frictional parallel (to the slope) component force:

Ff=FgSinθF_f = F_gSin\theta


If I'm being honest I am still confused.
Original post by Abby5001
If I'm being honest I am still confused.


Hmmmm. Diagram seems to be copyright protected. :angry:

Take a look at this video which explains the concept:

[video]https://youtu.be/dA4BvYdw7Xg[/video]
(edited 8 years ago)
Reply 12
Doing some physics past papers and I need help:Can someone tell me why the answers respectively are:

2R
R/2
2R/3
Reply 13
That is the whole question

Quick Reply

Latest