Hey what did people put for the knee pad question, i thought it was to do with increasing area to reduce pressure but other people said it was to do with newton's second law
I related it to an air bag in a car. I said it reduces the time it takes for the girl to stop so it therefore increases change it momentum and decreases time and I related it to the formula force = change in momentum / time. So the girl experiences less force and therefore less injuries occurs
I related it to an air bag in a car. I said it reduces the time it takes for the girl to stop so it therefore increases change it momentum and decreases time and I related it to the formula force = change in momentum / time. So the girl experiences less force and therefore less injuries occurs
did you put that due to the pressure decreasing the flow decreases p=dgh?
Yep I did put that, I actually had a feeling I don't know what inversely proportional graphs look like, so I wrote loads in case I was wrong somewhere. I feel so stupid right now, I thought I was good at maths and I actually had revised these graphs a lot for the maths exams argh! I hope they weren't specifically looking for 'inversely proportion' for the second mark.
I related it to an air bag in a car. I said it reduces the time it takes for the girl to stop so it therefore increases change it momentum and decreases time and I related it to the formula force = change in momentum / time. So the girl experiences less force and therefore less injuries occurs
How does it increase change in momentum?
Other than that, we have exactly the same answers
EDIT - Actually, wouldnt the soft knee pads increase the time taken to stop? Because they compress slowly like the airbags in cars?
Yep I did put that, I actually had a feeling I don't know what inversely proportional graphs look like, so I wrote loads in case I was wrong somewhere. I feel so stupid right now, I thought I was good at maths and I actually had revised these graphs a lot for the maths exams argh! I hope they weren't specifically looking for 'inversely proportion' for the second mark.
I said the graph was exponentially decreasing in terms of the x and y things, because in the textbook it had a very similar graph but for the decay of radaiton sort of stuff, and it followed literally exactly the same shape as the graph in the exam. I also included values and i added loads of explaination to back up my point cause I wasnt sure if my first point would be considered valid :/
I said the graph was exponentially decreasing in terms of the x and y things, because in the textbook it had a very similar graph but for the decay of radaiton sort of stuff, and it followed literally exactly the same shape as the graph in the exam. I also included values and i added loads of explaination to back up my point cause I wasnt sure if my first point would be considered valid :/
I think you had to say: 1) The depth decreased as time increased 2) It was a non-linear relationship
I have seen past papers and they are the two points they usually want you to give but they usually have some other stuff in the 'accept' such as negative gradient.
I think you had to say: 1) The depth decreased as time increased 2) It was a non-linear relationship
I have seen past papers and they are the two points they usually want you to give but they usually have some other stuff in the 'accept' such as negative gradient.
Exactly I dont think it was either exponential or inversely proportional- I dont think inverse touches the y and I dont think exponential touches the x- the graph we saw did both
I think you had to say: 1) The depth decreased as time increased 2) It was a non-linear relationship
I have seen past papers and they are the two points they usually want you to give but they usually have some other stuff in the 'accept' such as negative gradient.