AS chemistry - post here if need help

dude, u jus hav nth to say over me cuz u jus realised that u jus werent being logical and/or didnt think before u post. btw, YOU were the one who wanted a debate on whether the global warming suggestion was acceptable.

and dude, im jus being nice here to spot ur mistakes. if u were in a real life situation about this discussion again, u wouldnt get dissed so badly. this is only a forum dude, and btw how does everybody learn? obviously is to learn from their MISTAKES.

so u think i hav a patronising tone? can u define the word tone? u cant even hear a word wt im saying here and now u make this judgment. if this was a real life situation, i can say i could have said all those stuff to u in a very soft, calm, kindly voice with kind emotions which aint offensive at all.

btw even if u let the person decide, it wont solve the problem. an answer is only correct or it is incorrect. there is no 'in-between.' therefore, even if he goes on ur side or say im wrong, it still doesnt prove anything.

u recognise other ppl here are reasonably intelligent? good guess, nice subjective statement. btw i didnt say anything about ppl here having low IQ.

yes i want "the effects on human health due to climate change" explained in a patronising way. btw, no matter how hard u try, that would still be irrelevant to answering the question.

wooo... looking for support eh?

http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn?stage=1&word=debate
notice the word formal- its means a different thing to argument which what you seem to want calling my reasons "sht"

ah of course your perfect sorry I forgot that, please grow up, you have yet to offer an arguement about how climate change doesn't effect human health and hence we must conclude you are lying.


Do you not know how to use a dictionary, its in alphabetical order, go to t and look up the word tone. The repeated use of the word "dude" makes your tone very irritating for example. Calling my arguement "sht" shows a disrespectful tone.


what are you on about? The person can examine what you have said and what i have said and decide for tjhemselves.


Your tone (see above) suggests otherwise.

ok, just for you. Earth heats up, ice caps melt, sea levels rise, people drown. drowning is bad for human health.

When one person says something you should listen
when two people say the samething, surely you realise that there is quite alot of truth in it.

And what did i say about editting, or is your post count that important to you.

dude, how subjective is this? "when two people say the same thing... theres a lot of truth." okay, so i get two retarded ppl to say that 1+1=3. there is a lot of truth in it! LOL

btw y do i need to edit? i jus post when i feel like it. i hav human rights u know. editting will jus make it not the first thing u post, ppl might know that u deleted some stuff to cover up sth, even tho u jus added some stuff. get wt i mean?

no one ever beats me in arguing, i guess speciez99 should think harder next time before he posts.

dude, i know wt debate means. DUH. this aint even related to wt the question was about. it was only about 'one' reason why those exhaust gases are still hazardous to HUMAN health. stop trying to pull out irrelevant, random stuff to try piss me off. this aint gonna work.

btw i didnt say climate change WON'T affect human health. its jus that its totally unlogical and irrelevant in ANSWERING the question. u cant even read a question properly. it says ONE reason. and u said u can still add extra info and not get marks knocked off? u still havnt explained why u said that. therefore, u should also read my posts carefully before u post.

how funny is that making a false statement to diss me? "not know how to use a dictionary." there isnt anything to back up why u r saying this. btw, look up the word 'dude' in the dictionary. it doesnt even say that the repetitive use of it creates a very irritating tone. the reason why u hav this thought may be due to: u r very imaginative, ur brain gives u this image and/or ppl hav been calling u a dude in real life in a very irritating, rude tone, etc. thats how ur interpretation comes from.

and yes, a person can 'examine' wt ive said. however, they can only give subjective statements, which is not convincing at all. btw, afterall, if u link this bak to answering the question, i would be the one who is the most logical and un-subjective. ur global warming thing jus doesnt answer the question at all.

also, u said "your tone (see above)". dude, ive said this the second time. i could hav been using a kind, soft, calm voice to explain all of this to u in real life. dude man, cant u read properly?

lastly, u said "ice caps melt, sea level rise...... ppl drown." dude, this is very subjective. this aint gonna happen 'globally' and at all areas on earth. therefore, there are two sides to be subjectively judged for ur statement, which is not 'fully' correct to answer the question. not 'fully' therefore means that it is incorrect.

btw y do i need to edit? i jus post when i feel like it. i hav human rights u know.

And so do we, not to have to be subjected to all this monkey crap your spouting, never mind the bandwidth you're wasting. This argument has nothing to do with me, and yet, reading your posts has made me want to wallop you.

LMAO at human rights, try thinking about other people are thinking instead of your self

And your logic in the first question is quite deluded, as you identify correctly tone is a subjective thing unles maths, so your example is invalid. The fact that it is subjective means that the majority is normally right.

dude, how many times do i hav to say this? u cant define a tone over the internet<<< this is definitely objective. but yes judging a tone is subjective.

and u cant relate this to maths of course, as there is only correct and incorrect, no 'in-betweens.'

oh thats a start then, so instead of being dismissive, try thinking about what other people are saying. Also you need to learn to accept critism generally

you admit climate change will affect human health, well if you now think how it will effect human health prehaps you can make the jump to my answer


yes there is, you don't know the meaning of tone, you said it

ok thanks for that

hmm, it kinda hard with your abbreviations
why do you think its called global warming?

thank you for admitting you were talking BS
its subjective sooo? that doesnt make my view wrong

you aren't the only one
z!D4N would that be 3 people now that think your a waste of space, the list seems to be growing

just lol
try pulling your head out of your own arse

lol, its just that some ppl are being so unlogical so i must teach them my logic.

And so do we, not to have to be subjected to all this monkey crap your spouting, never mind the bandwidth you're wasting. This argument has nothing to do with me, and yet, reading your posts has made me want to wallop you.

God help us if we are ever taught your logic. I'm not sure what's going on in that head of yours, but it must be a pretty messed up place. Admit that you've lost this argument, chalk it up to experience, and come back when you've 1. got a better grasp of the English language and 2. understand what logic and reasoning mean.