The Student Room Group

I don't get people who see God and the bible as fact.

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Retired_Messiah
I googled the ten commandments:

1.

You shall have no other gods before Me.

2.

You shall not make idols.

3.

You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain.

4.

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.

5.

Honor your father and your mother.

6.

You shall not murder.

7.

You shall not commit adultery.

8.

You shall not steal.

9.

You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

10.

You shall not covet.

Exactly 3 of them are common in western law. I bolded them. The Ten commandments does not account for assault, child abuse, speeding, dangerous driving, drunk driving, child porn, fishing regulations, gun laws... you know actually the vast majority of the laws we follow aren't in there at all.


Homosexuality is merely a sexual preference at its core. Nothing more, nothing less. So we can basically say it's the same as being straight, or having a foot fetish, being a pedophile, liking blondes, being an ass man over a tits man. It's a preference one has.

Now, have you ever tried to force a change in any of your sexual preferences? Have you ever forcefully "tried" to stop liking what you like, or to like something you're not really that into. Most people haven't, because it's ridiculous and doesn't work.

It doesn't need to proven that homosexuality isn't a choice, because when you look at what it actually is, a sexual preference, and then compare it to any other sexual preference you realise it's not a choice at all, as no sexual or romantic attraction is ever really a choice. It's involuntary.


Cool.
Original post by TheNamesEmmanuel
Point I was making is that there is always a choice. You said it doesn't work. Someone not having a choice is one of the biggest lies and is what keeps people convicted. That is how a dictator is able to rule.. when the people under their control believe they don't have a choice.

Whether it is the desire or just act it doesn't matter. The desire may not be a choice but it can be overcome, like the desire to eat fast food :tongue:


The point I was making is that changing your sexual desires doesn't work. Let's disregard your examples for a second, (which weren't even sexual preferences so if we wanna be really accurate they shouldn't have been used to argue your point but I'd figure I'd humour you anyway) have you ever heard of anybody succesfully changing their sexual preferences and desires after making a conscious decision to change them (because tastes can change over time) themselves? I can't say I have, only have I seen people disregarding their own feelings and doing things they're not particularly into.

While we're at it, unless your preference is underage children, why would you want to "overcome" your own sexual/romantic preferences in the first place? What good can come of it?
Reply 42
Original post by Retired_Messiah
Christians break the Bible's rules all the time, I've never understood why some of them get so annoyed about gays when they don't even follow the other rules of Leviticus like not mixing fabrics in your clothing and the rule about having to go to church to do a cleansing ritual with a dove and a pigeon 7 days after your period ends.

And then when they realise this point half of them use the same argument pro-homosexuality people use, parts of the bible are outdated etc etc. It's quite hilarious


Discrimination is only fun when there's no consequences to yourself.

That's the fun thing about 'pick and mix' religion. They take a literal interpretation when condemning others, but become a critical moral philosopher when interpreting the passages that impact their own life, before deciding which bits they like the sound of.
Reply 43
Original post by morningstar49
Who said it isn't a choice? I learn Psychology mate, it can be a choice! And don't say it's inheritance because it isn't!
God didn't create homosexuality, if he did then it wouldn't have been Adam and Eve in the first place. It is not natural, there's a male and a female for a reason. It's against mother nature!
Plus, back in the olden days, there was no such thing as being gay so I'd say being gay is just part of the new era thing. Or that there's something wrong with one's brain as it's not functioning in the normal way.
To conclude, homosexuality is a choice because no one forces you to become a gay or a lesbian!


People don't wake up one day and think "TODAY IS THE DAY. I AM GOING TO BE GAY. THEN TOMORROW, I WILL BE STRAIGHT".

ADAM AND EVE AIN'T SH*T OK. IT IS A MYTH, A STORY, with a bloody talking snake. God created everything apparently, so therefore, he created homosexuality. Eve is created from Adam's ribs, yeah because that can totally happen.

"Plus, back in the olden days, there was no such thing as being gay"

Bullcrap. Olden days what? Olden days when?
Ancient Rome: 753 BC–476 AD.

"Roman men were free to enjoy sex with other males without a perceived loss of masculinity or social status, as long as they took the dominant or penetrative role."
"Although Roman men in general seem to have preferred youths between the ages of 12 and 20 as sexual partners, freeborn male minors were strictly off-limits, and professional prostitutes and entertainers might be considerably older."
Original post by DominicRCWC
ADAM AND EVE AIN'T SH*T OK. IT IS A MYTH, A STORY, with a bloody talking snake.


Adam and Eve were probably the names of the monkeys that first showed signs of sentience therefore giving birth to a new "spritual" race. The snake was Adam's trouser snake imho :laugh:

And the apple represented carnal knowledge. That's why they were ashamed of their reproductive organs after the act. Because before this they were not sentient so didn't understand the nature of their act.

Also, it could be to do with fear of death. Reproductive organs only exist because we are mortal. Having sex reminds us that one day we have to die.
Original post by Chrysippus
you should calm down, you clearly have some self-consciousness with yourself to accuse homosexuals of having something wrong with their brain...


Well yea because it's not a normal thing to do, it's against mother nature! Otherwise, why on earth do you think it took time to legalise gay marriages because everyone knows it's not normal!
Like I said before, I've only just expressed my own views and opinions. I have thte right to do so. I respect your opinions too. Personally, I have nothing wrong with gay but all I said was that it's going against nature. In fact, I've got friends who are gays and lesbians. Plus, my brother (my own blood brother) is gay too. Even he said that it's a choice! He chose to be gay!
Original post by Another
I don't know whether you legitimately study psychology at any substantial level, but you've certainly never studied history.


Sorry mate, I never got the chance to study History man!!! What a pityyyy!
Original post by DominicRCWC
People don't wake up one day and think "TODAY IS THE DAY. I AM GOING TO BE GAY. THEN TOMORROW, I WILL BE STRAIGHT".

ADAM AND EVE AIN'T SH*T OK. IT IS A MYTH, A STORY, with a bloody talking snake. God created everything apparently, so therefore, he created homosexuality. Eve is created from Adam's ribs, yeah because that can totally happen.

"Plus, back in the olden days, there was no such thing as being gay"

Bullcrap. Olden days what? Olden days when?
Ancient Rome: 753 BC–476 AD.

"Roman men were free to enjoy sex with other males without a perceived loss of masculinity or social status, as long as they took the dominant or penetrative role."
"Although Roman men in general seem to have preferred youths between the ages of 12 and 20 as sexual partners, freeborn male minors were strictly off-limits, and professional prostitutes and entertainers might be considerably older."


Well I didn't people do that though, it takes time mate! I never said all of a sudden a normal guy turned into a gay. Let me just make this clear to you, I don't have anything against gay or lesbians! All I did was to express my own views and opinions and I have the right to do so. In fact my brother is gay, he came out ages ago and even he admits it's a choice that he made. Plus, I've got gay friends whom I get along easily with. They are like sooo wonderful and kind hearted, literally I can share anything with them. So trustworthy! Personally, I just find it abnormal, going against the nature!
Well, for you it might just be a MYTH, A STORY, and A BLOODY SNAKE! But there are people who believe in it, soo please do respect that mate! Don't mock other people's beliefs! It's not right!
And for the last few comments, not even gonna say anything about it!
Original post by morningstar49
Well yea because it's not a normal thing to do, it's against mother nature! Otherwise, why on earth do you think it took time to legalise gay marriages because everyone knows it's not normal!
Like I said before, I've only just expressed my own views and opinions. I have thte right to do so. I respect your opinions too. Personally, I have nothing wrong with gay but all I said was that it's going against nature. In fact, I've got friends who are gays and lesbians. Plus, my brother (my own blood brother) is gay too. Even he said that it's a choice! He chose to be gay!


actually there has been homosexual behaviour in many species so it is definitely not going against nature

the reason it took so long to legalise gay marriage is because there are stupid people in the world in powerful positions, devoid of reason and logic, who think homosexuality is unnatural and immoral because an ancient book says so

your brother is either lying or he's not actually gay
Original post by Retired_Messiah
The point I was making is that changing your sexual desires doesn't work. Let's disregard your examples for a second, (which weren't even sexual preferences so if we wanna be really accurate they shouldn't have been used to argue your point but I'd figure I'd humour you anyway) have you ever heard of anybody succesfully changing their sexual preferences and desires after making a conscious decision to change them (because tastes can change over time) themselves? I can't say I have, only have I seen people disregarding their own feelings and doing things they're not particularly into.

While we're at it, unless your preference is underage children, why would you want to "overcome" your own sexual/romantic preferences in the first place? What good can come of it?


Sexual desires, career desires or food desires, all desires so they were relevant examples no matter how goofy it sounds.
Some people having to disregard their own feelings.. so we shud allow gay marriage so they dont have to. Its pretty dangerous to base laws on mere feelings. I wont be surprised when beastiality is accepted, horrified maybe but not surprised. By your logic if people feel like having sex with animals and not humans why should they have to disregard their feelings and have sex with humans.. something they dnt want to do. Thats becoming a common way of thinking

What good can come of doing something right instead of wrong? Thats how I see your question.
Reply 50
Hi there, thanks for your questions. I hope I can be of some help as a practising Christian.

Original post by DominicRCWC
[[im not hating on bible bashers im just questioning them]]

i had someone telling me today that (obviously its bad to be gay) so i asked, why did god create gays if they're not allowed? in which she replied that people choose to be gay and that its not in the bible to be gay, and its like, not everything is in the bible...

and why would someone choose to be gay in a society its punishable by death? (i got blocked after mentioning this lmao). they wouldnt choose to be gay in a society where there is a massively negative stigma attached to it.


I agree with your position that homosexuality is not a choice. That at least seems to be the current scientific and sociological consensus. Some Christians are uncomfortable with this because it would imply that God 'created' a sinful human. However, this issue is not brought forward with regard to diseases people are born with - homosexuality is not unique in evoking this issue.

i also saw someone mention that theyre worried more about the decline in people following christianity etc. why would we feel the need to follow a 2000+ year old religion that is outdated. the things in the bible apply to the times of the time it was written, not modern day.


I think 99% of Christians would disagree with this. You are right in that each book of the Bible is occasional; it is written by somebody for a specific time and place. However, it is a non sequitur to claim that it is irrelevant to today's society. The Sermon on the Mount is applicable teaching, as are parables; Paul's letters on spiritual gifts, salvation and justification; the epistle of James on the importance of works; John's revelations for the future - to take from the New Testament only. The Bible is relevant for today.
Original post by morningstar49
Who said it isn't a choice? I learn Psychology mate, it can be a choice! And don't say it's inheritance because it isn't!
God didn't create homosexuality, if he did then it wouldn't have been Adam and Eve in the first place. It is not natural, there's a male and a female for a reason. It's against mother nature!
Plus, back in the olden days, there was no such thing as being gay so I'd say being gay is just part of the new era thing. Or that there's something wrong with one's brain as it's not functioning in the normal way.
To conclude, homosexuality is a choice because no one forces you to become a gay or a lesbian!


It's against mother nature??? Say that to all the other species of animals that have homosexual individuals. Natural definition: "existing in or derived from nature; not made or caused by humankind." Homosexuality occurs in nature just like heterosexuality. Just cause it doesn't lead to offspring from the two individuals doesn't mean it's unnatural.

"To conclude, homosexuality is a choice because no one forces you to become a gay or a lesbian!" No one has forced me to like the colour orange but for whatever reason I do. Therefore I have chosen to like it? No one forces me to like chips but I do. Therefore I have chosen to like it? Equally...no one forces me to be straight therefore it is a choice. That argument is awful.
Reply 52
Original post by Retired_Messiah
Christians break the Bible's rules all the time, I've never understood why some of them get so annoyed about gays when they don't even follow the other rules of Leviticus like not mixing fabrics in your clothing and the rule about having to go to church to do a cleansing ritual with a dove and a pigeon 7 days after your period ends.

And then when they realise this point half of them use the same argument pro-homosexuality people use, parts of the bible are outdated etc etc. It's quite hilarious


Even if your contextual argument was correct, you still haven't evaded the issues of the New Testament. Romans 1 explicitly condemns homosexual activity.

Christians don't follow the Old Testament because they are under a 'new covenant'. Romans: 'we serve in the new way of the Spirit, not in the old way of the written code.' Jesus fulfilled the law through his death.

You are also erroneously trying the take the application of the principle and translating it into twenty-first century Britain. If you greeted a Japanese person and they refused to shake your hand, would you condemn them as being impolite? You wouldn't because within their society a greeting follows a different procedure; it would be like somebody in Britain raising their leg in acknowledgement.

Leviticus is similar. The 'outdated' commandment on shaving, for instance, is a sign of the covenant. Christians today practice baptism instead. Purity in general is about maintaining one's righteousness; today repentance and the Holy Spirit fulfil this. All that is required is a bit of application and a little common sense.
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by TheNamesEmmanuel
Sexual desires, career desires or food desires, all desires so they were relevant examples no matter how goofy it sounds.
Some people having to disregard their own feelings.. so we shud allow gay marriage so they dont have to. Its pretty dangerous to base laws on mere feelings. I wont be surprised when beastiality is accepted, horrified maybe but not surprised. By your logic if people feel like having sex with animals and not humans why should they have to disregard their feelings and have sex with humans.. something they dnt want to do. Thats becoming a common way of thinking

What good can come of doing something right instead of wrong? Thats how I see your question.

You will notice in my question I excluded the rights of pedophiles, they shouldn't be allowed because if they did that'd be child abuse. Similarly, beastiality is a pretty rough deal for the animals involved, so we shouldn't be allowing that either. My view is if your feelings aren't going to cause abuse or harm to others there is no need to repress and disregard them.

The point I was trying to make was for more "average" preferences, homosexuality, bisexuality, slightly irregular fetishes and the like. Repressing your feelings is a pretty bad idea, it does harm to oneself. So for people who have preferences that don't do any real harm, they should be allowed to do as they please. Perhaps I did not make things explicit enough, I did not mean to condone beastiality.

Original post by morningstar49
In fact my brother is gay, he came out ages ago and even he admits it's a choice that he made.

Are you certain you haven't misinterpreted and the choice he was referring to was not in fact merely his decision to come out?

Spoiler

Original post by Hariex
Even if your contextual argument was correct, you still haven't evaded the issues of the New Testament. Romans 1 explicitly condemns homosexual activity.

Christians don't follow the Old Testament because they are under a 'new covenant'. Romans: 'we serve in the new way of the Spirit, not in the old way of the written code.' Jesus fulfilled the law through his death.

You are also erroneously trying the take the application of the principle and translating it into twenty-first century Britain. If you greeted a Japanese person and they refused to shake your hand, would you condemn them as being impolite? You wouldn't because within their society a greeting follows a different procedure; it would be like somebody in Britain raising their leg in acknowledgement.

Leviticus is similar. The 'outdated' commandment on shaving, for instance, is a sign of the covenant. Christians today practice baptism instead. Purity in general is about maintaining one's righteousness; today repentance and the Holy Spirit fulfil this. All that is required is a bit of application and a little common sense.

My point was that a lot of Christians (mainly American protestants as far as I can tell) use the more famous Leviticus verse to go against homosexuality, but then don't follow the rest of Leviticus. If one was to disregard the whole chapter, or even the whole old testament as you do, that's fine, I respect that to some degree as it actually makes sense to do so. My issue is more certain people like to pick and choose between individual verses and such, which ain't good.

You can claim that "christians don't follow the old testament" but the fact is a number of denominations do seem to feel the need to bring it up even though it's mostly a really awful set of teachings, very much a product of its time.

To be honest I had no idea it was mentioned in the new testament, no anti-gay marriage people I've seen have ever even brought it up, and the new testament I've never really looked into in depth.
Reply 55
Original post by Hariex
I think 99% of Christians would disagree with this. You are right in that each book of the Bible is occasional; it is written by somebody for a specific time and place. However, it is a non sequitur to claim that it is irrelevant to today's society. The Sermon on the Mount is applicable teaching, as are parables; Paul's letters on spiritual gifts, salvation and justification; the epistle of James on the importance of works; John's revelations for the future - to take from the New Testament only. The Bible is relevant for today.


i was not implying that the bible is not totally relevant today, but i was meaning explicitly things such as premarital sex, gays etc, not parables that have a moral teaching. of course the bible is still relevant today but not everything.
Original post by morningstar49
Well I didn't people do that though, it takes time mate! I never said all of a sudden a normal guy turned into a gay. Let me just make this clear to you, I don't have anything against gay or lesbians! All I did was to express my own views and opinions and I have the right to do so. In fact my brother is gay, he came out ages ago and even he admits it's a choice that he made. Plus, I've got gay friends whom I get along easily with. They are like sooo wonderful and kind hearted, literally I can share anything with them. So trustworthy! Personally, I just find it abnormal, going against the nature!
Well, for you it might just be a MYTH, A STORY, and A BLOODY SNAKE! But there are people who believe in it, soo please do respect that mate! Don't mock other people's beliefs! It's not right!
And for the last few comments, not even gonna say anything about it!


Tbh I don't think believing in Adam and Eve deserves any respect... Why should it?
Original post by morningstar49
Well I didn't people do that though, it takes time mate! I never said all of a sudden a normal guy turned into a gay. Let me just make this clear to you, I don't have anything against gay or lesbians! All I did was to express my own views and opinions and I have the right to do so. In fact my brother is gay, he came out ages ago and even he admits it's a choice that he made. Plus, I've got gay friends whom I get along easily with. They are like sooo wonderful and kind hearted, literally I can share anything with them. So trustworthy! Personally, I just find it abnormal, going against the nature!
Well, for you it might just be a MYTH, A STORY, and A BLOODY SNAKE! But there are people who believe in it, soo please do respect that mate! Don't mock other people's beliefs! It's not right!
And for the last few comments, not even gonna say anything about it!


I'd take your indignant defence of religious views more seriously if your username wasn't a reference to Satan.
In
Original post by DominicRCWC
im agnostic personally, ive been brought up catholic but ive sort of developed my own way to think and come to a conclusion of not believing in a god but sort of wanting to believe theres something.




faith is dumb when it comes to things like that.

he didnt create them cos he isnt real. the bible wasnt written by god himself it was written through people that had their own opinions which can thus be debatable, theyre myths/stories. god also created a talking snake that tricked them into eating a forbidden apple too then yeah?


the people who wrote the scriptures were guided by the Holy Spirit. Belief in God is through faith- everyone is entitled to their own personal view. If you don't believe it, it is entirely up to you
Original post by Gwilym101
I'd take your indignant defence of religious views more seriously if your username wasn't a reference to Satan.


I never said that I was religious though mate! I was just making some Biblical reference because I was brought up as a Christian but now neither my family nor myself practices it especially after my brother came out gay!
P.S. my username is also a reference to Jesus, maybe you need to some proof! (Awkward) Here you are -----> In Revelation 22:16, Jesus unmistakably identifies Himself as the morning star.

Quick Reply

Latest