The Student Room Group

Prospective maths students: Don't go to Warwick Unis "Problem solving conference"

Scroll to see replies

Original post by TeeEm
Although my bias against Warwick is well known, these type of conferences from most universities are a total waste.



These things happen ... It does not matter how high you perch you can still make silly mistakes or even blunder. I have no problem with that.


you hate warwick just for maths or overall, why?
Reply 101
Original post by welcometoib
you hate warwick just for maths or overall, why?


I do not hate ... I dislike/disfavour
I prefer not to discuss it today, yet again, as I am very busy working at present.
Take it as
the place does not appeal to me personally.
Original post by welcometoib
you hate warwick just for maths or overall, why?

it is just really damn overrated
Original post by Alex_Aits
I agree with the second half of what you say (that you should apply to the college that you love) but I don't agree with the fact that you'll always get a place at Cambridge if you deserve it - even more so with mathematics.
For example, Gonville & Caius say (in the admissions booklet) that they take on 90% of those they give offers to. On the other hand, the university wide average is around 50%. I find it hard to believe, therefore, that all of the best candidates (or most 'deserving' candidates) are taken.
Moreover, some candidates (mainly internationals) are given SS or S1 offers (e.g from Trinity, and this year I know Downing have too, and presumably other colleges). Some of these who miss the offer, and say get S1 with an SS offer, don't get accepted, and frankly I think I'd deem it unfair if someone with say 3,2 (I know someone who got accepted to Kings with this) was accepted.
In general I think everyone just overthinks admission. Just apply, see what happens, hope for the best, and expect the worst. :smile:

That is why is said 'usually'.

Also, people who get lowers/ higher offers are not just given them randomly, they are given the offers for a reason. This usually means they have excelled in other parts of the application process more than others etc. someone who gets an SS offer may not have had a good Interview and are therefore given a harsher offer to prove themselves. Everything to do with the applications process is deliberate.
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by Scarlet Sword
it is just really damn overrated


You can't say that when you have very little understanding of the course or how it is taught. Attending one conference does not make you an expert on the university course. From my research, next to Oxbridge, the Warwick course is taught considerably better than most others (including Imperial)
Original post by Alex_Aits
You can't say that when you have very little understanding of the course or how it is taught. Attending one conference does not make you an expert on the university course. From my research, next to Oxbridge, the Warwick course is taught considerably better than most others (including Imperial)


How could you know that unless you've been to both unis?
Original post by shamika
How could you know that unless you've been to both unis?


Oh I agree I can't know for certain as there's no benchmark for comparison, but I was basing this on statistics and student responses when I asked them.
Those who I've spoken to at imperial very much felt like they were burdened with the majority of learning (they're both first year though so maybe this changes thereafter). Obviously you'd be a good judge of this as you've been there!
Of course I have no idea about the quality of lectures etc though


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Alex_Aits
Oh I agree I can't know for certain as there's no benchmark for comparison, but I was basing this on statistics and student responses when I asked them.
Those who I've spoken to at imperial very much felt like they were burdened with the majority of learning (they're both first year though so maybe this changes thereafter). Obviously you'd be a good judge of this as you've been there!
Of course I have no idea about the quality of lectures etc though


Posted from TSR Mobile


Imperial does leave you alone for the most part, but I saw that as a good thing; large classes with problem sets are largely ineffective (although first year problem sheets are also quite easy for the most part).

It's fairly similar everywhere other than Oxbridge which has the tuition system. I think Imperial have started to take first year tutorials more seriously with once a week meetings to discuss problems you might be having in your courses (or the problem sheets). Those tutorials are for 2/3 students at a time only.

Quality of lecturers varies from the excellent to abysmal. Again, think that's the same elsewhere too.
Original post by TeeEm
I do not hate ... I dislike/disfavour
I prefer not to discuss it today, yet again, as I am very busy working at present.
Take it as
the place does not appeal to me personally.




Posted from TSR Mobile
What's your view on its physics department?
Reply 109
Original post by Kadak
Posted from TSR Mobile
What's your view on its physics department?


no opinion ...
I know no one which went to Warwick to do Physics
(I know a lot of people which went to Warwick for maths and/or economics)
Original post by TeeEm
no opinion ...
I know no one which went to Warwick to do Physics
(I know a lot of people which went to Warwick for maths and/or economics)

here are a few more problems from my collection of problems that you might be interested in
(didn't write these, these are basically quick and easy problems that still require a bit of thinking though)
1. Find positive integers a, b, c such that a3+b4=c5a^3 + b^4 = c^5
2. For what kind of real a and b is 01(1xa)1bdx>01(1xb)1adx \displaystyle\int_{0}^1 (1-x^a)^\frac{1}{b} dx > \int_{0}^1 (1-x^b)^\frac{1}{a} dx?

Thoughts:

Spoiler

Spoiler

(edited 8 years ago)
Reply 111
Original post by Scarlet Sword
here are a few more problems from my collection of problems that you might be interested in
(didn't write these, these are basically quick and easy problems that still require a bit of thinking though)
1. Find positive integers a, b, c such that a3+b4=c5a^3 + b^4 = c^5
2. For what kind of a and b is 01(1xa)1bdx>01(1xb)1adx \displaystyle\int_{0}^1 (1-x^a)^\frac{1}{b} dx > \int_{0}^1 (1-x^b)^\frac{1}{a} dx?

Thoughts:

Spoiler

Spoiler



Thanks.
I will try to look at them early next week
Original post by TeeEm
Thanks.
I will try to look at them early next week

Again, some quick and easy problems.

3. My accurate clock now reads exactly 11:59. How many times will the hour and minute hand overlap again in the next day and 2 minutes?
4. A stick is broken into three pieces. Find the probability that these pieces can form a triangle.
Thoughts

Spoiler

Spoiler

(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by Scarlet Sword
Again, some quick and easy problems.

3. My accurate clock now reads exactly 11:59. How many times will the hour and minute hand overlap again in the next day and 2 minutes?

Spoiler

/QUOTE]

Spoiler

Original post by FireGarden

Spoiler



Yep, you're definitely missing something, picture a clock in your head.
Original post by FireGarden

Spoiler


Are you not thinking of a 'second hand'?
Original post by rayquaza17
Are you not thinking of a 'second hand'?


I had a feeling I was being very unintelligent. Thanks!
Original post by FireGarden
I had a feeling I was being very unintelligent. Thanks!

give yourself a pat on the back since you answered a harder question :smile:
Original post by Scarlet Sword


4. A stick is broken into three pieces. Find the probability that these pieces can form a triangle.


Is it clear from the wording of this problem what the process for breaking the stick is?
Original post by Scarlet Sword
Just went to Warwick Uni's "Student maths problem solving conference" and it was a complete waste of time.

All the questions were dumbed down beyond belief (we got questions like sketching x^2 + 1, finding how many times 100! divides 10 and so on), the event was overall very boring, I learned nothing at all the whole day and my maths skills did not improve at all. Almost everything that was taught was covered in year 9 :facepalm:

It was a complete waste of time and I am extremely disappointed in Warwick Uni for making such a pathetic programme.

(Also lmao the maths admissions tutor evaluated L2L1=0L^2 - L - 1 = 0 incorrectly and stated that 1+52\displaystyle\frac{-1+\sqrt5}{2} is the golden ratio :rofl:)

FFS warwick, get your act together! This is an event for 6th form, not lower fifth!


Lol I was there too on the 2nd, only good thing was getting that book and I completely agree with you

Posted from TSR Mobile

Quick Reply

Latest