The Student Room Group

Teacher having homosexual relationship with student

Most people will be familiar with the consensus thinking on (particularly under-age) teacher-student relationships: When the teacher is female, the student is male, the male response demonstrates insouciance: "LAD", "where were those teachers when I was in school", "lucky bastard". Conversely with a male teacher and a female student it is more of a lynch mentality (and reflected in significantly harsher sentencing).

Recently we had a case of a 24 year old lesbian teacher sleeping with a 15 year old female student. Her punishment? Banned for life from teaching.

So what will the male equivalent (pursuing a homosexual relationship with a male student) get as homosexual propaganda is increasingly normalised in schools? Will the rainbow mafia be insisting that #LoveWins or will he be strung up as a paedophile? Would it be considered "homophobic" to condemn the male teacher in a similar fashion to one who preys on a girl, as per the examples at the top?

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
DAMN!

I'd give that teacher a raise.
Reply 2
lol the conspiracy theories you guys come up with for LGB people are just absurd.

sure there are some downright whackos out there but nobody's trying to make "the act of paedophilia" perfectly fine christ.
Original post by Inexorably
It's okay, some people get so shocked by social progression that they resort to throwing around extreme views.


I'm don't keep up with it so any news about what is going on with the LGBT community is new news to me :lol:
Reply 4
They have form on this.

Germany's left has its own tales of abuse. One of the goals of the German 1968 movement was the sexual liberation of children. For some, this meant overcoming all sexual inhibitions, creating a climate in which even pedophilia was considered progressive.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/the-sexual-revolution-and-children-how-the-left-took-things-too-far-a-702679.html
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by thesabbath
Most people will be familiar with the consensus thinking on (particularly under-age) teacher-student relationships: When the teacher is female, the student is male, the male response demonstrates insouciance: "LAD", "where were those teachers when I was in school", "lucky bastard". Conversely with a male teacher and a female student it is more of a lynch mentality (and reflected in significantly harsher sentencing).
Recently we had a case of a 24 year old lesbian teacher sleeping with a 15 year old female student. Her punishment? Banned for life from teaching.
So what will the male equivalent (pursuing a homosexual relationship with a male student) get as homosexual propaganda is increasingly normalised in schools? Will the rainbow mafia be insisting that #LoveWins or will he be strung up as a paedophile? Would it be considered "homophobic" to condemn the male teacher in a similar fashion to one who preys on a girl, as per the examples at the top?


You've just set up a scenario that should be illegal in so many ways xD
Dude... grow up. This is an absolutely pathetic argument dreamt up by a desperate group of people who are rapidly being sidelined into irrelevance, not by LGBT people, but by society as a whole.
(edited 8 years ago)
why are there so many homophobic threads recently?

"Would it be considered "homophobic" to condemn the male teacher in a similar fashion to one who preys on a girl, as per the examples at the top?" - no it wouldn't
Reply 8
Original post by Artur96
So going back to OP's post, if that scenario happened between a male teacher and student, providing that the student would not press any charges against the teacher, would it be love or pedophilia?


It would be neither, given that paedophilia is, as you said, an attraction to prepubescents. The context of the OP's scenario is referring to case studies from high school, so you can't throw around the term without it being applicable to a case of abuse within a primary school setting. I'm pretty certain nobody is going to argue that anybody is condoning a relationship between a teacher and a primary school student, no matter how much of a 'bleeding-heart liberal' they are considered to be. Additionally, sex education in a primary school is primarily contained to male/female genitalia info, and any advocations for inclusive sex ed are aimed at age-appropriate stages of Key Stage 3 and 4. So, again, the OP's attempts to somehow bridge a connection between this proposed social policy and a paedophiliac consequence aren't actually connected.

The situation, however, would still be a very clear and straightforward case of child grooming. The Children Act 1989 and 2004 would make this clear, as would the Working Together statutory guidance for protecting minors from sexual grooming. Furthermore, the Sexual Offenses Act specifically refers to power roles within relationship formations, hence why a teacher can be prosecuted for engaging in a sexual relationship with a 16 or 17 year old, despite being over the age of consent. All of these are completely separate from sex education, and have nothing to do with the nature vs nurture debate surrounding paedophilia. As a gay person *and* a social worker who works within child protection, I can safely say there's no overlap. Sex education doesn't influence child grooming laws in the slightest. Age of consent isn't the measurement for understanding child abuse within a teacher-student dynamic, as it's about sexual exploitation and coercion.
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by thesabbath
Most people will be familiar with the consensus thinking on (particularly under-age) teacher-student relationships: When the teacher is female, the student is male, the male response demonstrates insouciance: "LAD", "where were those teachers when I was in school", "lucky bastard". Conversely with a male teacher and a female student it is more of a lynch mentality (and reflected in significantly harsher sentencing).

Recently we had a case of a 24 year old lesbian teacher sleeping with a 15 year old female student. Her punishment? Banned for life from teaching.

So what will the male equivalent (pursuing a homosexual relationship with a male student) get as homosexual propaganda is increasingly normalised in schools? Will the rainbow mafia be insisting that #LoveWins or will he be strung up as a paedophile? Would it be considered "homophobic" to condemn the male teacher in a similar fashion to one who preys on a girl, as per the examples at the top?


I was going to address this but... LOL at the parts in bold. "Homosexual propaganda"? "Rainbow mafia"? Your thinly veiled homophobia isn't cute. I bet you're fond of using snarl terms like 'Cultural Marxism' as well. Hahahaha. Paranoid much?

Typical.
Reply 10
Original post by satanicwarmaster
I was going to address this but... LOL at the parts in bold. "Homosexual propaganda"? "Rainbow mafia"? Your thinly veiled homophobia isn't cute. I bet you're fond of using snarl terms like 'Cultural Marxism' as well. Hahahaha. Paranoid much?

Typical.


One could equally say that "homophobia" is a snarl term, dished out by the "tolerant".
Sexuality has NOTHING to do with this scenario.

No teacher of any gender should be sleeping with any student of any gender. It's ****ing sick, IMO. I am a teaching assistant and in roles like that you are in a position of power over young people and to enter into a relationship is, especially a sexual one, is frankly, an abuse of that power and of the delicate trust kids have in you. It doesn't matter if they 'want' it. If you are a teacher and you sleep with a student who is 15 years old or younger there is something seriously wrong with you.

Even 6th form students, so students who are over the age of consent, should NOT be sleeping with their teachers. I repeat, no matter how it might feel, there is a clear power imbalance between teacher and student and to sleep with a student would be abusing that.

Also, please back off with your thinly veiled homophobic bull****.

LGBTQ+ folks DO NOT advocate Paedophillia. The reason why homosexuality is ok is because it is consensual. Both parties want it and no one gets hurt. A child is too young and vulnerable to consent. Same goes for animals, before anyone bring up bestiality.

Like seriously, this thread T.T

Too much TSR for today, me thinks.

Btw, I am a lesbian- within the next couple of years I will have earnt my PGCE and will be teaching secondary school children. My sexuality does not mean I have the peverse desire to sleep with my pupils. And in spite of what you will probably argue, this thread IS homophobic. So rather than denying it, accept what I, as a queer person who deals with crap like this damn day, is saying, apoligise and carry on with your day.
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by Inexorably
lol the conspiracy theories you guys come up with for LGB people are just absurd.

sure there are some downright whackos out there but nobody's trying to make "the act of paedophilia" perfectly fine christ.


It's the Gay Mafia Agenda :rolleyes:
Original post by battycatlady
Sexuality has NOTHING to do with this scenario.

No teacher of any gender should be sleeping with any student of any gender.

Too much TSR for today, me thinks.



My thoughts exactly.
I think the biggest crime is the teacher being gay

Original post by battycatlady
Sexuality has NOTHING to do with this scenario.No teacher of any gender should be sleeping with any student of any gender. It's ****ing sick, IMO. I am a teaching assistant and in roles like that you are in a position of power over young people and to enter into a relationship is, especially a sexual one, is frankly, an abuse of that power and of the delicate trust kids have in you. It doesn't matter if they 'want' it. If you are a teacher and you sleep with a student who is 15 years old or younger there is something seriously wrong with you.Even 6th form students, so students who are over the age of consent, should NOT be sleeping with their teachers. I repeat, no matter how it might feel, there is a clear power imbalance between teacher and student and to sleep with a student would be abusing that.Also, please back off with your thinly veiled homophobic bull****.LGBTQ+ folks DO NOT advocate Paedophillia. The reason why homosexuality is ok is because it is consensual. Both parties want it and no one gets hurt. A child is too young and vulnerable to consent. Same goes for animals, before anyone bring up bestiality.Like seriously, this thread T.TToo much TSR for today, me thinks.Btw, I am a lesbian- within the next couple of years I will have earnt my PGCE and will be teaching secondary school children. My sexuality does not mean I have the peverse desire to sleep with my pupils. And in spite of what you will probably argue, this thread IS homophobic. So rather than denying it, accept what I, as a queer person who deals with crap like this damn day, is saying, apoligise and carry on with your day.


I completely agree, In fact I think we should promote female homosexuality
(edited 8 years ago)
#TurnAllTheKidsHomosexual
#GayMarriageInAll50States
#DeleteTheStraights

:nyan:
Consent is from 16, watching 17 year olds in sexual acts is peadophilia, or being out of age and engaging in those activities, that's what he means. And it's something that will undoubtedly change in the future, hence "peadophilia legalised'

Peadophilia legalisation is the only rational way forward since the marriage battle has been won. Or incest. Nevertheless, the arguments you use against both of these are the same arguments people used against homosexuality half a century ago.
(edited 8 years ago)
Reply 17
lol the fear mongering in here. Get over yourself.

Yes pedophilia is a sexual orientation by definition, and no it is not a crime. Child molestation is a crime. Possession, distribution and production of child porn is a crime. You can be a pedophile without being involved in those matters.
Original post by Alyssa_kassar
The homosexual Mafia are going to corrupt our schools soon.
Anyway,why are you upset that paedophiles are 'born this way'. They use the same excuses the homosexual Mafia use. Stop being a hypocrite


Don't you have anything better to do? :facepalm:
Original post by Artur96
What? It's real. People are born pedophiles; they don't get to choose whether they like prepubescent children. It's just like with homosexuals: they don't get to choose whether they like men or not.


It's not about whether they were born that way, it's about whether it hurts the parties involved.
Homosexuality isn't accepted because they were born that way, homosexuality is accepted because it doesn't hurt anyone.
Then stigma surrounding homosexuality becomes an even more pressing matter when it's not a choice.

Homosexuality exists in females also.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Quick Reply

Latest