Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
Hey! Sign in to get help with your study questionsNew here? Join for free to post

Strange situation findings - help

Announcements Posted on
Talking about ISA/EMPA specifics is against our guidelines - read more here 05-03-2015
  1. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Im currently going over the strange situation by Mary Ainsworth and I'm a bit confused about the findings. In my text book it says that:
    Secure attachment = 66%
    Insecure avoidant = 22%
    insecure resistant = 12%

    But online it says that:
    Secure attachment = 70%
    Insecure avoidant = 15%/20%
    Insecure resistant = 15%/10%

    Do any of you know what numbers are correct as I'm revising and i don't want to put incorrect figures down

    Thanks
  2. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Are the two findings from different studies? In my books, I have Ainsworth (1970) and then the second lot of findings you have written down - 70%/15%/15%. Nowhere have I come across the first percentages.
  3. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mogwai98)
    Are the two findings from different studies? In my books, I have Ainsworth (1970) and then the second lot of findings you have written down - 70%/15%/15%. Nowhere have I come across the first percentages.
    The study in my AQA A book by Collins (fourth edition) says Ainsworth and Bell (1970) but the findings are not the same as yours but i'll just ask my teacher
  4. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by H.i)
    The study in my AQA A book by Collins (fourth edition) says Ainsworth and Bell (1970) but the findings are not the same as yours but i'll just ask my teacher
    Hmm... okay.
  5. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by H.i)
    The study in my AQA A book by Collins (fourth edition) says Ainsworth and Bell (1970) but the findings are not the same as yours but i'll just ask my teacher
    I don't think quoting specific numbers will matter (ball park figure will be fine).

    I briefly looked at the orginal studies:

    Ainsworth & Bell (1970) didn't classify children into different catagories (I couldn't find a single mention of "insecure" in the whole pdf document - > see for yourself! http://www.jstor.org.sci-hub.org/stable/1127388).

    A level textbook writers probably use figures mostly from other textbooks, which can easily be misquoted!

    Ainsworth (1971) looked at attachment in two seperate groups of children. If you look at the total then it goes 66.1%, 19.6%, 14.3% (secure, avoidant, ambivalent) (http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED056742.pdf pg.32)
  6. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by H.i)
    Im currently going over the strange situation by Mary Ainsworth and I'm a bit confused about the findings. In my text book it says that:
    Secure attachment = 66%
    Insecure avoidant = 22%
    insecure resistant = 12%

    But online it says that:
    Secure attachment = 70%
    Insecure avoidant = 15%/20%
    Insecure resistant = 15%/10%

    Do any of you know what numbers are correct as I'm revising and i don't want to put incorrect figures down

    Thanks
    My textbook gives the second set of figures
  7. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Okay thank you guys, i'll just go with the second set of figures
  8. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    In my AQA B textbook we have the first set of figures.
  9. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Got 70% for secure and 15% for other two - AQA As Psychology A
  10. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Thats so weird, I'm doing AQA psychology A but my book has the first set of figures but I think I'll just go with second set of figures as they are much easier to remember


    Posted from TSR Mobile
  11. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by H.i)
    Thats so weird, I'm doing AQA psychology A but my book has the first set of figures but I think I'll just go with second set of figures as they are much easier to remember


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    The bottom set of figures are the same but rounded to the nearest 10%, which is realistically a good level to rememebr (you wouldn't get marked down for saying 65% rather than 66% ... )
  12. Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by H.i)
    Im currently going over the strange situation by Mary Ainsworth and I'm a bit confused about the findings. In my text book it says that:
    Secure attachment = 66%
    Insecure avoidant = 22%
    insecure resistant = 12%

    But online it says that:
    Secure attachment = 70%
    Insecure avoidant = 15%/20%
    Insecure resistant = 15%/10%

    Do any of you know what numbers are correct as I'm revising and i don't want to put incorrect figures down

    Thanks
    honestly it doesn't matter if you have slight differences in the figures, i found this when i did A level psychology and as long as you have the roughly correct number then it is okay, i think i went for the rounded up numbers cause it was easiest to remember so 70%,20% and 10%

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: April 9, 2015
2015 general election
New on TSR

Vote in the TSR Political Party Contest!

Choose which TSR Party you want in Number 10

Article updates
Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.