The Student Room Group

Porn sites to be banned by the govt

Scroll to see replies

It is impossible to implicate, I'm sure horny guys/girls will use some sort of proxies to get around it anyway. Someone really needs to let the old farts in the Tory party know how the internet works.
:rofl:
Original post by drowzee
It is impossible to implicate, I'm sure horny guys/girls will use some sort of proxies to get around it anyway. Someone really needs to let the old farts in the Tory party know how the internet works.


They'll need to know how to use common sense first. Unless there's a way to block proxies and DNS changes
Reply 23
Original post by IIEquinoxII
Correlation does not equal Causation, so you have no point to make here


in this case, yes it does, a pervert who watched pornography then child pornogrpahy, leading to killing/raping a child is related
get ure facts right
Original post by wwelol
in this case, yes it does, a pervert who watched pornography then child pornogrpahy, leading to killing/raping a child is related
get ure facts right

The fact you already designated him a 'pervert' before the porn even came into it just goes to show how unrelated that actually is.

You're not highlighting the correlation but simply stripping down the stats to create the illusion of causation. The simple fact is that a majority of people consume porn in some way or another, whereas a majority of people are not perverted murderers/rapists.
So at 16/17 it's fine to have sex but not to watch it? Makes sense.

And nobody will be able to find a way around this, of course.
Original post by mogwai98
So at 16/17 it's fine to have sex but not to watch it? Makes sense.


It's not just 'sex' they're watching though, is it?
Original post by RobML
Female ejaculation though? What??

I assume the above relates to its inclusion as a "life-endangering" activity, rather than to female ejaculation per se.

If not; well, cf. OP.
Reply 28
Original post by Profesh
I assume the above relates to its inclusion as a "life-endangering" activity, rather than to female ejaculation per se.

If not; well, cf. OP.


Exactly. Is there a risk of fatal dehydration?

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Yuit
It's a completely sensible idea? If something is strictly 18+ it shouldn't be so simple to access.
Porn ruins people anyway in the sense that it desensitises young males, so that when many of them actually go on to have sex they get erectile dysfunction, it's a real growing problem now with this new generation, look it up.


And studies have concluded that it's due to porn?

I watch loads of porn, have lots of sex, and am always hard.
Original post by wwelol
porn should be banned, it ruins society; ie. fake fantasies, marriage breakdowns, becoming anti social, possible links to crimes and child pornography/child abuse etc etc


That isn't enough substance for an argument... Go on

Original post by ChickenMadness
This can't be real. They didn't even spell "your" correctly.

Guess I'll be breaking even more laws if this is true though.


:laugh:

I'll be in your defence, shall you ever go to court.

Original post by wwelol
in some cases yes, but the croelation between child sex offences and pornography is strong
read the case april jones the guy who killed her was a pornogrpahy addict


Haven't read about case given, but you need to provide more evidence/cases than that.

Original post by lustawny
Porn should be banned anyway, on account of how tacky it is. Seriously, you might as well burn my retinas out of my skull and have done with it.

You should try tugging yourself off with only the aid of your own imagination, without looking at any form of media outlet - which would mean you'd be exercising another part of your body that requires regular care and attention. Win-win situation, really. Think of it as a sort of challenge, and make the fantasies become uglier each time and see how long it takes for you to shoot your bolt gun.


Too true, though there are the anomalous good videos out there.
It's a shame that I never saved one I saw ages ago, which was of really good quality (no, actually two).

If I was helping someone make a porn video, I bet I could exponentially increase the quality just by a few tips here and there, which no one has seemed to have picked up.
Original post by RobML
Exactly. Is there a risk of fatal dehydration?

Posted from TSR Mobile


Ejaculation will cause the female to slip a disc of course, considering apparently a sneeze can. -.-
Reply 32
Original post by XcitingStuart
Ejaculation will cause the female to slip a disc of course, considering apparently a sneeze can. -.-


Gosh, that'd have to be some powerful squirting. Like Blastoise.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by RobML
Gosh, that'd have to be some powerful squirting. Like Blastoise.

Posted from TSR Mobile


Try to imagine it; try to imagine how painful it would be to have while orgasming.
*cringe*
I can imagine the type of pain where you know it will come if you move, and it builds up under the surface.
Original post by Birkenhead
It's not just 'sex' they're watching though, is it?


It's not exactly but I think the focus would be better placed on improving sex ed (from a young age), rather than trying to do something practically impossible i.e. stopping all under 18s from watching it. By banning porn and saying 'no, you have to be an adult to see this' it's only going to make it seem more attractive to a lot of young people, who'll find a way to get access to it. Kind of like you can't buy alcohol until you're 18, but how many people drink underage? Does the fact that it's illegal to drink at 15 mean no 15 year olds do? No. I'd say rather than the problem being with porn itself, it's more that it's the only source of information for too many people.
Original post by sjgriffiths
The fact you already designated him a 'pervert' before the porn even came into it just goes to show how unrelated that actually is.

You're not highlighting the correlation but simply stripping down the stats to create the illusion of causation. The simple fact is that a majority of people consume porn in some way or another, whereas a majority of people are not perverted murderers/rapists.


He's a troll. Don't waste your fingers on him.
Original post by Little Toy Gun
http://thetab.com/blog/2015/07/31/david-cameron-plans-to-shut-down-porn-websites-47527

Pornhub, Redtube and Spankwire could be made illegal by the Tories

They could be gone within monthsYou’re favourite free porn sites could be shut by the government if age restrictions aren’t put in place.Free sites like Pornhub, Redtube and Spankwire could soon be banned, or made illegal, if they fail to install age verification software.In a statement, David Cameron said: “I want to see age restrictions put into place or these websites will face being shut down.”Legislation could be brought in to make it an offence to publish porn without age controls.The Government complains the UK’s popular porn sites don’t have “robust age verification”, suggesting to deny underage access through means such as payment providers.The Government will shut down porn sites if they don’t bring in age controlsThis restriction on the industry comes months after The British Board of Film Censors outlawed a list of potentially “life-endangering” sexual acts, such as fisting, spanking and female ejaculation.British porn producers now can’t make adult material to be sold in shops. Until now, the banned porn was easily available on free websites like Porn Hub and Red Tube.The Government want to make sure “the rules that apply offline apply online”, as DVD sales have more effective age controls.In autumn, the Government will consult the most effective ways of regulating the sites to deny access to children, before deciding which will be regulated or banned.Joanna Shields, the minister for internet safety and security said: “Whilst great progress has been made, we remain acutely aware of the risks and dangers that young people face online.“This is why we are committed to taking action to protect children from harmful content. Companies delivering adult content in the UK must take steps to make sure these sites are behind age verification controls.”


So you're fighting for 12 year olds to access to porn sites?
Tbh, teenagers watching porn is a lot safer than them having unsafe sex with each other, getting STDs and having babies. Porn is a part of life now, we just have to accept it. Most men grew up watching porn, and 99.999% of them aren't insane sex crazed loons.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 38
Original post by sjgriffiths
The fact you already designated him a 'pervert' before the porn even came into it just goes to show how unrelated that actually is.

You're not highlighting the correlation but simply stripping down the stats to create the illusion of causation. The simple fact is that a majority of people consume porn in some way or another, whereas a majority of people are not perverted murderers/rapists.


i didnt say that, im saying pornogrpahy leads to fantasies that people try to puruse in reality, ie; the april jones murderer
and look at madeline mcanne, the police interviewed pedophiles in Portugal
there is some sort of link between the two
Original post by wwelol
i didnt say that, im saying pornogrpahy leads to fantasies that people try to puruse in reality, ie; the april jones murderer
and look at madeline mcanne, the police interviewed pedophiles in Portugal
there is some sort of link between the two


It's not porn that made these people weird; they were deranged in the first place

Posted from TSR Mobile

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending