Like most people who will be applying this year for a BCL/Mjur at Oxford or an LLM at Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford or the University of California, Berkely, I have a first-class LL.B.
So I satisfy the "minimum" academic requirement.
However despite getting five As in my Highers, 3 As in my Advanced Highers (I am Scottish) at school, I had a series of personal problems and a health crisis in the second year of my LL.B. that led me to score some pretty poor grades that are not in keeping with my prior and following academic achievements. I even decided to convert to a Joint Law and History degree (still an LL.B.) and take an extra part-time year to undertake history subjects while I "recovered".
I then pursued a full joint degree and attained above 70% grades in every legal subject, some of them around 77%.
I strongly feel that this terrible phase in my life is a "deal-breaker" and will likely haunt my academic record forever.
It really does look awful on the transcripts and while I did redeem it afterwards (plus the fact that I was "perfect" beforehand), my honours-level law subjects included some "non-traditional" ones that fitted in with my own unique socio-legal approach to research, which is something I would like to take further.
Also, I don't have any "distinctions" or "awards" to my name: just straight As at school, a first-class degree and commercial experience in an entrepreneurial setting, which I am sure a gazillion candidates for the same courses will have in addition to 'scholarships' or 'awards' (which I believe is one of the sections on the forms for these universities i.e. 'please indicate any awards, distinctions, scholarships you have received'
.
To cut a long story short, should I bother applying to any of these universities for this course? I really don't want to waste money. I have a place reserved at LSE for a different course that I may take up next year if I acquire the right funding and am currently applying for jobs, so it will not kill me to resist applying