Who is worse, a bomber pilot or a terrorist?

When i said it's better , i was saying that belief is one which is held by a large portion of the west. Of course , genocide can never be justified.

What utter nonsense. The West has intervened to prevent genocide, you were the one who just said genocide was preferable to the anarchy that might come from intervention. That is clearly your view and the Islamist view, given nobody in the West other than Islamists subscribes to that view. Nice try to deflect blame to the West (as per usual... does the script ever change with you people?)

The terrorists who attacked Paris believed that they were fighting for a good cause and even died for it. They mercilessly killed civilians.

The pilots who fly bombing raids over Syria, rubbelizing the whole country and killing thousands of civilians also believe they are in the right.

No war has been declared by the Western forces and although the ISIS forces have declared war on the West this was not an "official declaration".

Who is worst?

Both. The two acts aren't comparable and they are both equally as dispicable as people die and are forced to live in fear.

The middle east was more stable before the west interfered , just look at Iraq before and after the US invasion.

Yes, Kurdish genocide is preferable

Both. The two acts aren't comparable and they are both equally as dispicable as people die and are forced to live in fear.

Except this isn't how modern airstrikes work (I assume that you are referring specifically to Western forces, not Assad).
You've been watching too many films about the Blitz.

Also, the bombing raids aren't deliberately designed to target civilians in non-combat or military areas (TBH, I can't unequivocally say that this applies to the Russians, but one would hope so).

So, clearly the terrorist is worse.
Your transparent attempt at whataboutery clearly highlights your agenda and sympathies.

You are confused (or a lying thug).

Western airstrikes in Syria and Iraq have been highly targeted strikes. Only 400 civilians have been killed as against 18,000 ISIL terrorists killed over 15 months. That is obviously different to ISIL thugs gunning down 128 civilians in a single day.

Terrorists = deliberately attack civilians

Bombers = attack who their leaders tell them to attack, with intent on killing enemy soldiers

is it really that hard to think through?

The terrorists who attacked Paris believed that they were fighting for a good cause and even died for it. They mercilessly killed civilians.

The pilots who fly bombing raids over Syria, rubbelizing the whole country and killing thousands of civilians also believe they are in the right.

No war has been declared by the Western forces and although the ISIS forces have declared war on the West this was not an "official declaration".

Who is worst?

Their intention is to eliminate terrorists which would benefit both the West and those people whose family members are being killed by drones.

From a terrorists perspective, we are evil. Do you understand that? If you were raised in Syria, you would probably support ISIS, and so would I. They're not inherently bad human beings.

The death toll from bombing is in thousands....