The OP wants a reliable and cheap to run car when he is doing about 16k/year!
Stop harping on about performance when he does not want that!!
Most people tend to own for over 3 years...er no! Most people sell a car when it is 3 years old and buy a new one because after 3 years you have to start doing MOTs, the warranty ends and everything becomes expensive with expensive service costs and so forth.
As or the £1000 recouped on resale well thats wrong. Just done a very quick search on autotrader (
http://atsearch.autotrader.co.uk/www/cars_search.jsp?searchform=&modelexact=1&lid=search_used_cars_full&photo=1&state=none&sort=3&hassearched=Y&make=FORD&min_pr=75&source=0&model=MONDEO&max_pr=&miles=40&agerange=5&mileage=&postcode=gu46+7tn&bodyid=0&fuelid=0&colour=&transmissionid=0&ukcarsearch_full.x=14&ukcarsearch_full.y=7) for a Ford Mondeo, less than 3 years old. Second one down, 1.8 petrol, £4990, Third one down TDCI, £4995...so you gain a £5 by having a diesel, wow, thats really worth the avg £1000 outlay!
You have always lectured me to stop using opinion as fact and not to use personal experiences as fact. Then when it comes to you, it is perfectly fine to use your personal experience as fact even though a reliable source (which you usally do to me
) has been put in front of you. Talk of hypocritical!
It is clear to see the financial and performance benefit for YOU, but that study by the IAM showed that for the population, unless you do some pretty hefty mileage then petrol is better for break even.
You will find in statistics of this nature, it is very hard to define what is average and therefore a set of benchmark figures is agreed on another set of statistics. That means inherently the average may not be correct, but it is better than a stab in a dark! This happens in all statistical analysis in government.
Graham