The Student Room Group

1.5 million illegal immigrants have now entered Europe

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/illegal-immigrants-entering-europe-tops-6924763

What would you do to solve the crisis? should they be deported? should they have to stay in the 1st safe country e.g. most Turkey/Lebanon

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
Original post by Ace123
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/illegal-immigrants-entering-europe-tops-6924763

What would you do to solve the crisis? should they be deported? should they have to stay in the 1st safe country e.g. most Turkey/Lebanon


Should maybe we all stop responding with fear to tabloids?
thats it? when are the rest coming?. 4m is appropriate.
People are going to say you're a racist for calling them immigrants.
Reply 4
Why can't Muslim countries take in Muslim refugees ?
Reply 5
Original post by demx9
Why can't Muslim countries take in Muslim refugees ?


They do and have done as Turkey, Pakistan and Lebanon have approximately 30% of worldwide refugees.
Reply 6
Original post by lamentas
They do and have done as Turkey, Pakistan and Lebanon have approximately 30% of worldwide refugees.


Reply 7
Original post by Evening



Erm...Turkey, Pakistan and Lebanon are different to Saudi and UEA, etc. Question was why muslim countries don't take refugees and they do. More than others actually.
Reply 8
If you read the mirror, mail, express you won't understand logic because you'll be too used to your fears and anxieties being played on.

Never mind...
Simple. Just destroy imperialism. I think that's the right solution.

Posted from TSR Mobile
They shouldn't have to stay anywhere besides their country of origin. Yes, their country is in a sorry state but nothing gets solved when everyone tries to run away.
Original post by skunkboy
Simple. Just destroy imperialism. I think that's the right solution.

Posted from TSR Mobile
you mean, we should stop Turkey, Iran and Saudi Arabia (and their respective allies) fighting for regional predominance in the Middle East ? how could we do that ?
Original post by mariachi
you mean, we should stop Turkey, Iran and Saudi Arabia (and their respective allies) fighting for regional predominance in the Middle East ? how could we do that ?


Establish a Caliphate?

It seemed to have worked well for the EU thus far.
Original post by TheArtofProtest
Establish a Caliphate?

It seemed to have worked well for the EU thus far.
good idea

a Caliphate where Sunni, Alaouites, Jaafaris, Hutus, Ibadis, Druzes, etc will live in peace and harmony .... as they have done for centuries...
Original post by mariachi
good idea

a Caliphate where Sunni, Alaouites, Jaafaris, Hutus, Ibadis, Druzes, etc will live in peace and harmony .... as they have done for centuries...


Given that they have survived this long, I'd say that was testament to the ability of a Caliphate to address their needs, don't you?

What was done once, can be done again.
Original post by TheArtofProtest
Given that they have survived this long, I'd say that was testament to the ability of a Caliphate to address their needs, don't you?

What was done once, can be done again.
the various Caliphates, through their long history, were in a state of quasi-permanent civil war

since no clear method of succession to power was ever devised, civil war broke out regularly. The unity of the Caliphate barely outlived Muhammad's demise by a few dozen years

as to surviving - of course that people will survive most everything, except death
Original post by mariachi
the various Caliphates, through their long history, were in a state of quasi-permanent civil war

since no clear method of succession to power was ever devised, civil war broke out regularly. The unity of the Caliphate barely outlived Muhammad's demise by a few dozen years

as to surviving - of course that people will survive most everything, except death


When you are talking about events that took place over a period of 1300 years, some semblance of centuries, to which you refer to, may not go amiss.

Up until the 12th Century, there were various factions with their own individually held territories and whilst they may occasionally have gone to war with each other, it was mostly a succession which led to the capture of more territory, as opposed to direct hostilities with each other.

All that changed when the Mamluks and Ottomons gained prominence and power so yes, the revival of a Caliphate (along the lines of say, the EU) may turn out to be good for the region.
Original post by TheArtofProtest
the revival of a Caliphate (along the lines of say, the EU) may turn out to be good for the region.
it's much more likely that present States will split along religious/ethnic lines, rather than a Caliphate emerge, uniting the Ummah

present developments in Muslim-dominated States point to more fractiousness and sectarianism, rather than anything else

as to the distant future, no one knows (not even Allah)
Reply 18
Original post by TheArtofProtest

All that changed when the Mamluks and Ottomons gained prominence and power so yes, the revival of a Caliphate (along the lines of say, the EU) may turn out to be good for the region.


lol
Original post by mariachi
it's much more likely that present States will split along religious/ethnic lines, rather than a Caliphate emerge, uniting the Ummah

present developments in Muslim-dominated States point to more fractiousness and sectarianism, rather than anything else

as to the distant future, no one knows (not even Allah)


I believe you are simply talking about provincial governorship, being split along religious/ethnic lines, but still being bound by the common bond of Islam.

That seems to be the only way in which conflict in the ME can be subdued.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending