The Student Room Group

Grieving mum found hanged near Bedroom Tax eviction letter

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/grieving-mum-found-hanged-near-7223683

Her 16 year old son committed suicide which freed up a room in her house making he liable to bedroom tax. She didn't pay it and was threatened with eviction which lead to her killing herself.

I thought one fo the good thing about right wing conservative governments was supposed to be that they leave you alone. Not threaten eviction for not paying tax fo raving an empty bedroom... especially when that bedroom is empty because your son took how own life in there.

Scroll to see replies

Very very sad. That's what you get when everything is controlled robotically. The human element is forgotten.
This Government couldn't care less about us.

They are the true danger to Britain and its people, not Corbyn or any one else.
Tory austerity is ridiculous at the moment. It really shows how much lib dems took the edge off of their sh*t during the coalition.
(edited 8 years ago)
The idea that an ordinary reasonable person would kill themselves because they have to pay the bedroom tax is a bit daft. Clearly there was something wrong with her mentally at the time. We should do more for people like her to counsel them if possible through their issues, but to blame this on a tax is just plain wrong.
While Amazon, Starbucks, Google and Apple get away scot free. Not to also mention the many high profile celebrities, CEO s and many other rich people that avoid tax and the companies and lawyers that help them to do so. This is what happens when you vote conservative lads.
Reply 6
Just want to say as someone who supports austerity this is absolutely heartbreaking and obviously someone in this situation should not have to pay bedroom tax.

I think the government should reconsider this policy and evaluate whether too many people are unfairly treated by it to continue its implementation.
Original post by callum_law
The idea that an ordinary reasonable person would kill themselves because they have to pay the bedroom tax is a bit daft. Clearly there was something wrong with her mentally at the time. We should do more for people like her to counsel them if possible through their issues, but to blame this on a tax is just plain wrong.


Maybe because of terrible NHS funding, especially in mental health, this woman was waiting 18 weeks + to be referred for the help she needs.

It's all part of the same problem.
Original post by djh2208
Just want to say as someone who supports austerity this is absolutely heartbreaking and obviously someone in this situation should not have to pay bedroom tax.

I think the government should reconsider this policy and evaluate whether too many people are unfairly treated by it to continue its implementation.


The problem with the austerity you support is that by its nature it doesn't consider the plight of individuals. This is a real consequence of austerity and it's kind of hypocritical to support austerity but be heartbroken by this.
Reply 9
That's ****ing tragic man
my God... do they not have any sympathy? why can't they consider it on a case by case basis because in this case the poor lady is grieving over her son's recent suicide IN THAT VERY ROOM and all they can say to that is "give me money for the room he left behind"...

be a little more considerate would ya? :/
Original post by ChaoticButterfly

I thought one fo the good thing about right wing conservative governments was supposed to be that they leave you alone. Not threaten eviction for not paying tax fo raving an empty bedroom...


This is the same backwards logic which is behind the use of the term 'bedroom tax'.

A removal of government aid is not the same thing as an active interference in someone's life.

Original post by captainslow69
While Amazon, Starbucks, Google and Apple get away scot free. Not to also mention the many high profile celebrities, CEO s and many other rich people that avoid tax and the companies and lawyers that help them to do so. This is what happens when you vote conservative lads.


Google agreed literally this week to pay a pile of back-taxes to the treasury.

Not that any of this is remotely relevant anyway.
If all this austerity, tax and cuts was actually making progress in getting our economy back on track, I wouldn't be any where near as hostile about it as it'd prove the Tories really are cleaning up Labour's mess.

But, they're not... it's getting worse and we'e still splurging borrowed cash on investments we can't afford, take HS2 as one example; arguably one of the worst, biggest potential investments in recent history.
Reply 12
Original post by EtherealNymph22
The problem with the austerity you support is that by its nature it doesn't consider the plight of individuals. This is a real consequence of austerity and it's kind of hypocritical to support austerity but be heartbroken by this.


Supporting austerity means supporting reduced spending. Making cuts in the wrong places is possible. The bedroom tax seems to be a bad way to make savings and therefore it is not hypocritical to question it.

No one who supports austerity likes hearing about this sort of thing or supports austerity because they want to hear about this. We support it because we believe that in the long run it is beneficial for the country as a whole.
Original post by djh2208
Supporting austerity means supporting reduced spending. Making cuts in the wrong places is possible. The bedroom tax seems to be a bad way to make savings and therefore it is not hypocritical to question it.

No one who supports austerity likes hearing about this sort of thing or supports austerity because they want to hear about this. We support it because we believe that in the long run it is beneficial for the country as a whole.


What type of cuts affect nobody? What type of cuts don't cause the very real consequences of individuals suffering to the point of suicide? I like to see the human side of austerity. If you can name some cuts of the Tory government since they were elected in May that haven't potentially led to the suffering of people than I would like to know (sincerely).

The problem is, they don't go after the people and corporations who owe big money FIRST. I think that cuts are a necessary evil but only in the circumstance where the least harmful avenues have been explored. And as previous posters have said, tax evasion of corporations is a serious amount of money and is just left to continue in plain sight.
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by callum_law
The idea that an ordinary reasonable person would kill themselves because they have to pay the bedroom tax is a bit daft. Clearly there was something wrong with her mentally at the time. We should do more for people like her to counsel them if possible through their issues, but to blame this on a tax is just plain wrong.

Well, yeah, her son had just killed himself. That was probably it. The bedroom tax probably pushed her over the edge when she was already struggling.
Original post by NathanW18
Well, yeah, her son had just killed himself. That was probably it.


Thanks for pointing that out. I knew something obvious was escaping me.
Original post by TimmonaPortella

Google agreed literally this week to pay a pile of back-taxes to the treasury.

Not that any of this is remotely relevant anyway.

The amount that they are paying back is a joke, 3.4% after all these years, if only we all could pay that :u:. Most working people pay seven times that amount proportionately. Google aren't even getting a fine for late payment and they still have the audacity to rip apart the NHS and severely reduce funding everywhere?!? Not to also mention the aforementioned companies plus more that continue to evade tax. Backward or corrupt, you decide.
(edited 8 years ago)
IDS continues to murder poor people and all TSR Tories can do, in emulation of their heroes on the government benches, is quibble over what to call the bedroom tax. As depressing as it is predictable. Insulting to the memory of the dead mother to boot - but of course they were modest renters with mental health issues, so they weren't really people.

Of course, she was working, even in her grief. But these policies only target the lazy scroungers, don't they? She was so lazy she couldn't even be bothered to get a job paying enough for her own house.

Face it: your party is morally bankrupt, IDS is a genocide, and your support is craven cowardice. They will come for you too.

Original post by Neostigmine
Very very sad. That's what you get when everything is controlled robotically. The human element is forgotten.


The human element is too unreliable. It relies on whim. The rules must either provide for such cases in great detail or ensure they play safe and cover them. Both cost money: it's just what it costs to have a society.
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by captainslow69
The amount that they are paying back is a joke, 3.4% after all these years, if only we all could pay that :u:. Most working people pay seven times that amount proportionately. Google aren't even getting a fine for late payment and they still have the audacity to rip apart the NHS and severely reduce funding everywhere?!? Not to also mention the aforementioned companies plus more that continue to evade tax. Backward or corrupt, you decide.


How much were they paying under labour?

You can whine all you want about how it's all a conspiracy, but the truth is simply that the effective taxation of multinationals is extremely difficult. What we are seeing is not perfection, but a step in the right direction.

Original post by scrotgrot
IDS continues to murder poor people and all TSR Tories can do, in emulation of their heroes on the government benches, is quibble over what to call the bedroom tax.


If you don't want to be picked up on idiotic comments, don't make them. That way, the discussion will stay exactly where you want it.
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by captainslow69
The amount that they are paying back is a joke, 3.4% after all these years, if only we all could pay that :u:. Most working people pay seven times that amount proportionately. Google aren't even getting a fine for late payment and they still have the audacity to rip apart the NHS and severely reduce funding everywhere?!? Not to also mention the aforementioned companies plus more that continue to evade tax. Backward or corrupt, you decide.


Loving the profile pic

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending