Hi guys
I am currently working on an essay on the doctrine of separation of powers in the uk.
I first defined what is meant by separation of powers and the history of it (Artistotle, Locke and Montesquieu...).
Then I stated the several breaches, first between executive/legislative, then legislative/judiciary and judiciary/executive, highlighting the checks and balances and so on...
How can I conclude?
I was thinking about stating the different views between judges and academics and then say that even if the 2005 made some reforms, it did not really change the relation between the legislative and executive as there are still some important overlaps.
What do you think?