Why? Being part of the EU doesn't necessarily mean we communicate quicker or more effectively in sharing intelligence. It simply throws up far more problems and threats.
Nowhere have i disagreed that the home home grown threat is greater than the threat from an immigrant (At the moment). I will likely change my tune in 12-18 months after a couple of million identity less people settle in Europe from Syria and god knows where else as the EU will likely try to force on its members. Yes i do have evidence that EU membership directly affects the terrorst risk.. because the most appalling and devastating attack was partly carried out by a so called refugee in a place closer to London than Edinburgh. Even if we choose to believe that EU membership means better inteligence sharing (Which i completely refute) Schengen and the mass immigration heading this way simply negates that advantage and some anyway.
How does it? Where is the evidence that the threat is diluted? Seems France is just getting a little unlucky this past year. It will be Romanias turn next because its just as a desirable target as London
1) Attacking the source instead of the content, regardless of what you compare it too does not make it any less true. I know it hurts your little narrative you're small prejudiced brain is running but it happened and I can show you the same story from different sources if you wish? Maybe you could watch the episode of crimewatch i alluded too..
No you're fourth point is total conjecture which i reasonably questioned and I see you have failed to address. Just saying "EU membership catalyses / harmonises / cooperation between members" without even trying to substantiate them claims, particularly when i am offering up evidence to the contrary does not work. It might sound good / logical but it simply IS NOT reality.
Yes France will come to our aid in time of need and we will do likewise.. our history, friendship and interests go back long before the European political union. sigh