STEP Maths I, II, III 1993 Solutions
Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.
-
Re: STEP Maths I, II, III 1993 Solutions
I'll post my alternatives for question 4 too.
(i) Note that
Letting x = 1/2 and using the logarithmic form of arctanh(x) gives
(iii)
-- the former is the sum of a geometric series and the latter is its derivative. Let x = 2/3 and we get
. To find the sum from r = 2 to infinity we need to subtract the terms for r = 1 and 0 which gives 9/2 - 1/2 = 4.
-
Re: STEP Maths I, II, III 1993 Solutions
I just did STEP II Q7, got the 'infinite descent' part but I don't really understand infinite descent (yet I know/think it is this). Why should it be that if I can keep dividing a,b,c by 5 - forever - that a,b,c are 0. I geuss 0/5=0 etc. and zero is still in the intergers. I've just convinced myself it's ok, I still don't like it.
It seems like a huge jump.
Would this be acceptable as an ending:
If an interger can be divided infinitely many times, then the interger must be zero because if it is not it must be infinite which isn't an interger. -
Re: STEP Maths I, II, III 1993 Solutions
I think a neater way (although I don't see anything wrong with your method) is to say,
Assume a is non zero, and an integer
Then there exists some a that contains infinitely many factors of 5 (this bit is crucial. 0 is definitely in the integers, and has infinitely many factors)
No such integer exists
By contradiction a=0
Similarly for b,c
Therefore only solutions when a=b=c=0 -
Re: STEP Maths I, II, III 1993 SolutionsAlternatively for the second integral:(Original post by Rabite)
I think I did Q2 in the Further Maths A.
But it seems quite easy so I've probably made a mistake. It's still red on the front page, so if no one else has typed it out already, I'll do so~
[edit] Here it is anyway.

By the product/sum formulae that no one remembers.
![= ½[\frac{1}{m+n} \sin(m+n)x + \frac{1}{m-n} \sin(m-n)x]_0 ^{2\pi} = ½[\frac{1}{m+n} \sin(m+n)x + \frac{1}{m-n} \sin(m-n)x]_0 ^{2\pi}](http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/latexrender/pictures/60/605bede0d35774c3039c11e294eec2d0.png)
But if m=±n, one of the fractions explodes. So in that case the question is:


![= ½[x+\frac{1}{2m} \sin{2mx}]_0 ^{2\pi} = ½[x+\frac{1}{2m} \sin{2mx}]_0 ^{2\pi}](http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/latexrender/pictures/3e/3ec3dd522e69272c1ef0bde01e469355.png)

If m=n=0, the integral turns to
.
As for the second bit.
Let x = sinh²t
dx = 2sinhtcosht dt




Ignoring the +c for now

Which you can rewrite using the log form of arsinh.




Let:



Now consider the differential of

By the product rule

Thus

So we now have two simultaneous equation where we can cancel the ugly integral:


Add (1) and (2)





The method with the hyperbolic functions is much nicer and removes a horrific sec cubed term but i thought i would have a go regardless using good old trg functions and i believe this is a good method to do it if you have no hyperbolic background.
I wish my STEP exam this year will have a question like this
-
Re: STEP Maths I, II, III 1993 SolutionsSTEP II Q14
Consider the general collision between a particle of mass m and a fixed surface of coefficient of restitution
:
speed before =
speed after= 
From which it follows that the kinetic energy after such collisions is:

Applying this to the problem:
let
be the kinetic energy of the particle just before the nth impact with the ceiling.
By conservation of energy:

and, more generally:

Conjecture
:

letting n=1:
and
therefore holds for n=1.
Similarly, let n=2:
and so
holds for n=2 as well.
Now let's assume the result:
.
Using this result, let n=x+1:

Therefore, by mathematical induction,
(the required result) holds 
Next part:
the maximum number of times the ball can hit the ceiling is the n that satisfies:

so:

So, taking logs of both sides:
As required.Last edited by ben-smith; 28-05-2011 at 17:46. -
Re: STEP Maths I, II, III 1993 SolutionsSTEP 1993 Q11: Note - done without a good diagram - might be a minor direction mistake somewhere.(Original post by brianeverit)
..
Choose a coord frame s.t. C = (0,0), D = (1,0), A = (0, 1), B = (1, 1).
Then AB has CM (0.5, 1), BC has CM (1, 0.5) and CD has CM (0.5, 0).
It follows that the CM of the entire wire is [ (0.5, 1) + (1, 0.5) + (0.5, 0)] / 3 = (2/3, 1/2).
If we hang from A, then BC lies below the horizontal and makes an angle arctan((1/2)/(2/3)) = arctan(3/4) with the horizontal.
If we hang from B, then BC lies below the horizontal and makes an angle arctan((1/2)/(1/3)) = arctan(3/2) with the horizontal (going the other way).
The tan of the angle between these is
tan(arctan(3/4)+arctan(3/2)) =
.
Since this is negative, it's the oblique angle between the lines; the acute angle will be arctan(18) as required.Last edited by DFranklin; 12-06-2011 at 11:41. -
Re: STEP Maths I, II, III 1993 SolutionsThanks. I knew about the mislabelling, but thought (incorrectly) it was 1992 and earlier.(Original post by ben-smith)
guys, you were confusing me. I think you have mixed up STEP III with STEP I. The papers have been mislabelled.
Care to try again? Not sure I'll have time.(Original post by Simon M)
.. -
Re: STEP Maths I, II, III 1993 SolutionsOK, for the actual correct question you asked about...(Original post by brianeverit)
Can anyone help with STEP III Number 11. I cannot get the given answer for the direction of the initial axis of rotation.
I think you can just take moments about each axis. It's easy to make mistakes, but after 3 attempts, I got their answer using this method.
I think you can also define OA = i, OB = j, OC = k and then simply find
where r is the position of a point on the line of force and F is the force itself. (Note that this tallies with the intuitive result that forces through O are irrelevant).
-
Re: STEP Maths I, II, III 1993 SolutionsIt's reassuring that you had to try 3 times because I keep getting an annoyingly similar answer. I keep getting (1,2,1) as opposed to (1,1,2). Did you get that? If so, where did you go wrong?(Original post by DFranklin)
OK, for the actual correct question you asked about...
I think you can just take moments about each axis. It's easy to make mistakes, but after 3 attempts, I got their answer using this method.
I think you can also define OA = i, OB = j, OC = k and then simply find
where r is the position of a point on the line of force and F is the force itself. (Note that this tallies with the intuitive result that forces through O are irrelevant).
EDIT: can I just swap the 2 and the 1 around by just redefining the axes or is that cheating?Last edited by ben-smith; 12-06-2011 at 13:16. -
Re: STEP Maths I, II, III 1993 SolutionsYou can't swap the axes because you'd also swap the forces, and nothing would change. What I kept getting was (1, -1, 2) - sign errors.(Original post by ben-smith)
It's reassuring that you had to try 3 times because I keep getting an annoyingly similar answer. I keep getting (1,2,1) as opposed to (1,1,2). Did you get that? If so, where did you go wrong?
EDIT: can I just swap the 2 and the 1 around by just redefining the axes or is that cheating?
As I calculate it, taking moments anticlockwise about OB you have: -1 (from the force O'A) and that's it.
Taking moments anticlockwise about OC you have: -1 (from AC'), -2 (from C'B) and 1 (from O'A) for a total of -2.
Taking moments anticlockwise about OA you have -1 (from A'C).
I think.
So I get (-1, -1, -2) which is obviously the same axis as (1,1,2).





v
