Mum of Eight Facing Eviction
Scroll to see replies
Original post by Donald J Trump
So what do you propose?
That the state is there for those who are unable to take care of themselves. Children are, by definition, unable to take care of themselves.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by spv
I agree, but what happens to the children then? The actions of their mother shouldn't be the kids' cross to bear.
Should they be ours to bear? If people weren't handed so much free money, then people like her wouldn't have such a big litter in the first place.
Original post by Katty3
That the state is there for those who are unable to take care of themselves. Children are, by definition, unable to take care of themselves.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
The children will be looked after whatever happens.
Original post by Katty3
That the state is there for those who are unable to take care of themselves. Children are, by definition, unable to take care of themselves.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
So you propose the state hive them 20k a year until they are all 16 years old. The best option is to evict and take x
Children into social services. 26k is the average wage here in the uk she is getting 20 for sitting on her ass. What about the other struggling families? Who have to live on the goodwill of others throygh cimpanies and people donating to foodbanks. I dont mind low paid workers getting some help along with tbe disabled but she is taking the piss and the father is for not putting up any money
Good. Thats one change this Tory government have done which was needed, limiting child £££'s to two kids.
Freeloading scrounger should not have had 8 kids. Pumping out kids for others to pay you for is not a career. I hope she is sterilised and kids put into care of somebody much more responsible
Freeloading scrounger should not have had 8 kids. Pumping out kids for others to pay you for is not a career. I hope she is sterilised and kids put into care of somebody much more responsible
Original post by Donald J Trump
So you propose the state hive them 20k a year until they are all 16 years old. The best option is to evict and take x
Children into social services. 26k is the average wage here in the uk she is getting 20 for sitting on her ass. What about the other struggling families? Who have to live on the goodwill of others throygh cimpanies and people donating to foodbanks. I dont mind low paid workers getting some help along with tbe disabled but she is taking the piss and the father is for not putting up any money
Children into social services. 26k is the average wage here in the uk she is getting 20 for sitting on her ass. What about the other struggling families? Who have to live on the goodwill of others throygh cimpanies and people donating to foodbanks. I dont mind low paid workers getting some help along with tbe disabled but she is taking the piss and the father is for not putting up any money
That's not in the best interests of the child; which is paramount according to the Children Act 1989.
Foodbanks are disgusting. People should not have to rely on the charity of those who will hold it against them. We should not have people begging for food in one of the richest countries in the world.
We should have a universal living wage.
We don't have enough foster carers or places in children's homes to take into care all children with parents on benefits. Nor should we. Families should not be cruelly divided because they are poor. Families shouldn't be divided when there is no cruelty and only love in that household.
You are turning poor against poorer while the rich sit idly by. They can't hear us screaming across the Great Divide. To paraphrase from one of my favourite musicians.
The working class keeps less of the profits that they produce than they did in the 1930s.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Not going to advocate children are taken away from a caring mother (for all you know, she is)
Irresponsible yes but at the end of it a fraction compared to what the corporations are robbing from us
Irresponsible yes but at the end of it a fraction compared to what the corporations are robbing from us
Original post by Katty3
That's not in the best interests of the child; which is paramount according to the Children Act 1989.
Foodbanks are disgusting. People should not have to rely on the charity of those who will hold it against them. We should not have people begging for food in one of the richest countries in the world.
We should have a universal living wage.
We don't have enough foster carers or places in children's homes to take into care all children with parents on benefits. Nor should we. Families should not be cruelly divided because they are poor. Families shouldn't be divided when there is no cruelty and only love in that household.
You are turning poor against poorer while the rich sit idly by. They can't hear us screaming across the Great Divide. To paraphrase from one of my favourite musicians.
The working class keeps less of the profits that they produce than they did in the 1930s.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Foodbanks are disgusting. People should not have to rely on the charity of those who will hold it against them. We should not have people begging for food in one of the richest countries in the world.
We should have a universal living wage.
We don't have enough foster carers or places in children's homes to take into care all children with parents on benefits. Nor should we. Families should not be cruelly divided because they are poor. Families shouldn't be divided when there is no cruelty and only love in that household.
You are turning poor against poorer while the rich sit idly by. They can't hear us screaming across the Great Divide. To paraphrase from one of my favourite musicians.
The working class keeps less of the profits that they produce than they did in the 1930s.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Who cares? A Living wage-to earn a living wage you need to work she doesn't
Original post by Donald J Trump
Who cares? A Living wage-to earn a living wage you need to work she doesn't
I care. So does the rest of the Trade Union movement and the Labour movement.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Well I'm assuming she must be using the Child Tax Credit +Child Benefit to feed herself and pay the rent which I think is child neglect as that money is to look after the children not to look after you.You receive no income yourself unless you are looking for work or disabled.Classifying this as child neglect would solve issues of people having children to survive.My mam was classed as disabled then got removed of the benefit and then went on JSA and then went onto carer's allowance for her mother and then when she died she went back on JSA.
(edited 8 years ago)
She's a weird case, but it seems that the law was in enforced correctly due to her missing payments. The problem she and many upcoming people who do not deserve benefits forget that benefits are a privilege and not a right. I've read some articles about her and after seeing that she failed to pay her housing rent to due to no logical reason, I have to side with law here. Also, the fact that she 8 children in a climate where benefits can change quite rapidly shows me that she fits the term of "benefit scum".
I want her children to be safe, I really do but If I have to follow the law, so should she.
I want her children to be safe, I really do but If I have to follow the law, so should she.
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by Katty3
I think a living wage is good all o said is they need to earn it not expect ot given to them
Should have her children talk away like the alchy who hits his kids down the street its influence, what if her kods have 8 each- how does the state sustain that
Original post by Slutty Salafi
Sell them for medical experiments.
Good idea, or we could sell them as food?
Original post by TSRFT8
The people with your views are the ones who are paying little to no tax and therefore just dont care. Your point is actually comical that we should let others like her open her legs and breed like their is no tomorrow and expect tax payers to pay with their earnt money. In addition this isnt in London it is in Birmingham, so that sob story isnt going to wash. Furthermore no one is forcing "poor" families, this lady is just scrounging on benefits and has done several interviews saying she doesnt need to work and she gets enough from the welfare state.
To say that the tax payers should keep funding this parasite is quite comical as the kids would receive much better care and quality of life if their useless mother was taken out of the equation. And no the reason why their mother has so many kids is NOT irrelevant as otherwise whats stopping every woman on the planet having 10 kids and putting their hands out to the government to give them some more money.
To say that the tax payers should keep funding this parasite is quite comical as the kids would receive much better care and quality of life if their useless mother was taken out of the equation. And no the reason why their mother has so many kids is NOT irrelevant as otherwise whats stopping every woman on the planet having 10 kids and putting their hands out to the government to give them some more money.
I can't believe anyone would be so daft as to have 8 kids in ******* Birmingham!!
Should have had em in the Big Smoke.
As regards your question,I see no reason why the taxpayer shouldn't pay for others children as being a mother is a far more important job than most.
In fact I'd say it's one of the best uses of your money.
Original post by YaliaV
Should they be ours to bear? If people weren't handed so much free money, then people like her wouldn't have such a big litter in the first place.
Got any proof that would be the case?
When it comes down to it, this is about a person who.desperately needs the money being denied it so those that don't can feel better about themselves.
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by Slutty Salafi
Sell them for medical experiments.
They're not worth much if they're not twins.
You can do a lot with a set of twins.
Apparently.
Original post by Donald J Trump
I think a living wage is good all o said is they need to earn it not expect ot given to them
Should have her children talk away like the alchy who hits his kids down the street its influence, what if her kods have 8 each- how does the state sustain that
Should have her children talk away like the alchy who hits his kids down the street its influence, what if her kods have 8 each- how does the state sustain that
Well they could build an extension.
And maybe add an attic room.
Original post by Donald J Trump
I think a living wage is good all o said is they need to earn it not expect ot given to them
Should have her children talk away like the alchy who hits his kids down the street its influence, what if her kods have 8 each- how does the state sustain that
Should have her children talk away like the alchy who hits his kids down the street its influence, what if her kods have 8 each- how does the state sustain that
The working class keeps less of the money that they bring in than they did in 1926.
Living conditions for the working class remain abhorrent in some quarters.
It is the wealthy that have a call to answer to, not large, poor families that are just getting poorer.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by moggis
I can't believe anyone would be so daft as to have 8 kids in ******* Birmingham!!
Should have had em in the Big Smoke.
As regards your question,I see no reason why the taxpayer shouldn't pay for others children as being a mother is a far more important job than most.
In fact I'd say it's one of the best uses of your money.
Should have had em in the Big Smoke.
As regards your question,I see no reason why the taxpayer shouldn't pay for others children as being a mother is a far more important job than most.
In fact I'd say it's one of the best uses of your money.
I think the dad should be forced tp pay something. They probably split after the eighth so the state would pay for the kids. They need to tax the father 60 percent until everything is paid back
Quick Reply
Related discussions
- Rate my poem please -Pirate
- “Do you live with your parents” - complicated SFE
- Getting expelled from university
- Housing crisis
- Feel so upset as a British Asian
- LATE PAYMENT-My bad experience with Unite Students
- Geography mock on monday: Help
- parents hogging student loan but not using it?
- Congratulations to Admit-One !! It is not their Birthday !!
- S2 binomial distribution question
- Opinions on what uni I should go to, or gap year?
- My Mum got into a punch up in my local uni town
- Can someone give this Q5 a mark out of 40 please. .
- Am I unreasonable or my roommate?
- Count To A Million In Words Part 1
- Why do some girls prefer to live with men when renting privately?
- Inheritance
- Long Covid And University.
- Middlesex vs Hertfordshire for computer science
- My step dad will not stop annoying and teasing me.
Latest
Trending
Last reply 2 days ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 2 days ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 2 days ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?Trending
Last reply 2 days ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 2 days ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 2 days ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?
