STEP maths I, II, III 1991 solutions
Maths and statistics discussion, revision, exam and homework help.
-
Re: STEP maths I, II, III 1991 solutions
II/1, Let t = lambda, alpha = z
h(x) = ax^2+bx+c = a(x^2+bx/a+c/a) = a((x+b/2a)^2-(b/2a)^2+c/a), so we require (b/2a)^2 = c/a, so b^2 = 4ac, i.e.discriminant = 0
3x^2+4x+t(x^2-2) = (3+t)x^2+4x-2t where a=3+t, b=4,c=-2t and we require that 16 = -8t(3+t), 0 = 3t+t^2+2, t= -1, -2.
(1) f(x)-g(x) = 2(x+1)^2
(2) f(x)-2g(x) = (x+2)^2
f(x) = 2x(1)-(2) = 4(x+1)^2 - (x+2)^2
g(x) = (1)-(2) = 2(x+1)^2 - (x+2)^2, hence A = 4, B = -1, C = 2, D = -1, m = 1, n = 2.
3x^2+4x+t(x^2+z) = (3+t)x^2+4x+zt, so a=3+t,b=4, c=zt, we require b^2 = 4ac, so 16 = 4(3+t)zt, 0 = 3zt+zt^2-4, a=z,b=3z,c=-4 then 9z^2 = -16z, z = -16/9. -
Re: STEP maths I, II, III 1991 solutionsYeah, that's the answer I got, double-checked it with Maple just now.(Original post by Rabite)
Ooh, very neat solution.
Has anyone done Q8 in II? I get 2ln{cosh½x}, but it doesn't seem to work when I put it back...
But I really can't be bothered to substitute in, maybe you plug it back wrongly?
-
Re: STEP maths I, II, III 1991 solutions
Well I'll type it up


The quadratic formula involves fractions, and I hate fractions, so let's complete the square:


Or 
coshx-sinhx is uh...e^{-x} and -(coshx+sinhx) is -e^x.
y`>0 at x=0 so we have to choose the + solution.

Integrate and find the +C to get
.
For the next bit, let u = dy/dx for a start:




Or
.

(Consider double "angle" formulae)
But u = dy/dx:

Tanh = sinh / cosh, which is a derivative over its function:

The solution passes through (0,0); so C =0.
(Taking the negative solution when we square rooted earlier results in something that can't pass through (0,0))
[edit] Is there no /cosech in Latex?Last edited by Rabite; 30-05-2007 at 22:22. -
Re: STEP maths I, II, III 1991 solutionsTSR's LaTeX is messed up then, the proper code is \csch(Original post by Rabite)
[edit] Is there no /cosech in Latex?
Nice work btw, though "1" and "coth(x)" is missing somewhere in the middle. All the STEP III questions are so unbearably long and tedious
Good thing the style was revamped.
-
Re: STEP maths I, II, III 1991 solutions*bawls*(Original post by Speleo)
Am I going crazy or are matrices no longer on the STEP syllabus?
http://www.ocr.org.uk/Data/publicati...ficat98487.pdf
Matrices are easy:/
Drop me a pm with your email, I think I have II and III from 2005, but lack I from 2005 and I from 2004, all others I think I have.(Original post by Speleo)
Also, does anyone have the '05 papers? (II and III '06 are available if you go back a couple hundred pages to last June in this forum). -
Re: STEP maths I, II, III 1991 solutionsMaybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how this works; you seem to have gone directly from talking about the lengths of the vectors to their actual (complex) values. In particular, I don't understand how you're taking into account the value of theta.(Original post by nota bene)
I'm attempting I/3 I'll see if I sort it out...
Okay, I'll post what I have now (probably should scan a sketch tomorrow as well), but it is not finished, and likely contains a few mistakes
For what it's worth, I think the correct formula for the first bit is:
-
Re: STEP maths I, II, III 1991 solutionsWe find the equations for the asymptotes meet at (1,-1), and your guess that the axes are at +/-45 degrees seems a good one.(Original post by Rabite)
II, 2:
I'm not entirely sure how to finish this one off, so someone else do that.
So we suspect that the axes have equations x+y=1, x-y =2. You could probably stop there, but partly to reassure myself, and partly for the hell of it, we can go further:
We look for
such that
resembles the given equation.
Easiest is to look first at the coefficients of x and y, which tells us that
, and then the coefficient of x^2 tells us
.
Expanding out, we find
and so using the given equation for the curve, we obtain
.
So we have explicitly obtained the equation of a hyperbola in terms of our new axes, confirming our guess.Last edited by DFranklin; 30-05-2007 at 23:50. -
Re: STEP maths I, II, III 1991 solutionsYes, I have(Original post by DFranklin)
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how this works; you seem to have gone directly from talking about the lengths of the vectors to their actual (complex) values. In particular, I don't understand how you're taking into account the value of theta.
For what it's worth, I think the correct formula for the first bit is:
towards the end, but it needs to be mentioned in the beginning. In general that whole post is totally messed up and should not be looked at
.
Someone else feel free to do this question, or I'll try to get it correct later.
generalebriety: I think my solution to I/6 is okay unless I've made a stupid mistake somewhere. (added Decota's comment, just to be on the safe side; I had seen it was not differentiated correctly, but not bothered to mention it as it was totally wrong either way.) Also take away this question as 'partially solved' until I fix it; it is horrible at the moment!
But I really can't be bothered to substitute in, maybe you plug it back wrongly?
Good thing the style was revamped.
















![\displaystyle\int_0^1\frac{(\sin ^{-1}t)\cos[(\sin^{-1}t)^2]}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}dt\\ \displaystyle\int_0^1\frac{(\sin ^{-1}t)\cos[(\sin^{-1}t)^2]}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}dt\\](http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/latexrender/pictures/ab/abf60212bed2a9780f253bf66d087634.png)
