You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Number Theory Problem

Announcements Posted on
TSR's new app is coming! Sign up here to try it first >> 17-10-2016
1. Why does this work:

Take a number, say 4 to keep it simple, and write down it's divisors:

1,2,4

Write down the number of divisors these numbers have:

1,2,3

1+2+3=6
6 squared = 36

Now go back and cube the number of divisors of the original divisors:

1,8,27

1+8+27=36

I can see we get 36 twice, but why?

(Marked as all levels because it's meant to be an investigation for all levels, not just people who do undergrad number theory.)
2. (Original post by rayquaza17)
Why does this work:

Take a number, say 4 to keep it simple, and write down it's divisors:

1,2,4

Write down the number of divisors these numbers have:

1,2,3

1+2+3=6
6 squared = 36

Now go back and cube the number of divisors of the original number (4):

1,8,27

1+8+27=36

I can see we get 36 twice, but why?

(Marked as all levels because it's meant to be an investigation for all levels, not just people who do undergrad number theory.)
Are you sure the bolded and underlines bit is what you meant to say there?
3. (Original post by Zacken)
Are you sure the bolded and underlines bit is what you meant to say there?
I think instead of number I was meant to say divisors. Updated OP, sorry!
4. (Original post by rayquaza17)
I think instead of number I was meant to say divisors. Updated OP, sorry!
No problem, it's a very cool observation! I can already think of a way into it, will update back with some thoughts.
5. Okay, so right off the bat - standard summation shows us that

Essentially: . That's all fine and dandy but not what we're looking at here. We've proven that the list or set has the above property, let's call this property .

Take two sets and then it is easy to show that if both of these lists has the property then so does their Cartesian product, straight from the definition, we have:

And supposing that both sets have the property, then by the definition:

.

Now multiply both of the above two together, some manipulation and reasoning shows that you that has property and hence (by extension, or induction if you want to be rigorous) if every satisfies so does .

Now consider the integer and the rest falls out by considering the number of divisors.

## Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
1. this can't be left blank
2. this can't be left blank
3. this can't be left blank

6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

4. this can't be left empty
1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register

Updated: April 2, 2016
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Today on TSR

### How does exam reform affect you?

From GCSE to A level, it's all changing

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read here first

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams