Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free to post

Commercial Law help! =/

Announcements Posted on
Last day to win £100 of Amazon vouchers - don't miss out! Take our quick survey to enter 24-10-2016
    • Thread Starter

    Alan works as a clerical assistant in the team responsible for managing orders forperishable food. The weeks before Christmas are a particularly busy time for the teamas the volume of perishable food to be ordered and distributed to the stores issignificantly higher. One day in early December, several members of the team were toounwell to work, and so Patricia, the team leader, asked Alan to verify the orders thatwere arriving at the warehouse. As he was doing so, he took a phone call from Todd atTurkeydelight Ltd, asking whether Supasave had decided on this year’s turkey order.Patricia was not in the office, but Alan had noticed a reference to “turkey order as before”on a spreadsheet, and so Alan told Todd that Supasave would order 10,000 turkeys forthe week before Christmas. This was in line with orders in previous years. However,Supasave had decided that they would change suppliers this year and get their turkeysfrom Perfectpoultry Ltd instead. When Turkeydelight’s delivery lorries arrived at thewarehouse on 17 December, Patricia told them that they had already taken delivery ofthe turkeys from Perfectpoultry and that Supasave had not intended to place an orderwith Turkeydelight. The lorries returned to Turkeydelight’s coldstore, but by then therewas insufficient space for all the turkeys and Turkeydelight had to hire two large freezercontainers to store the turkeys to prevent them from going off. Turkeydelight insists thatit has a contract with Supasave for 10,000 turkeys and that it is entitled for compensationbecause Supasave refused to take delivery and because it had to acquire additionalstorage facilities to keep the turkeys. Turkeydelight was able to resell most of the turkeysat a lower price to Ladle, a discount grocery chain.

    Advise Supasave on
    (i) whether Alan’s actions have resulted in a binding contractbetween Supasave and Turkeydelight; and
    (ii) assuming that there was a contract,whether Supasave is liable to pay compensation and for what.

    Cant see any point apart from law of agency, buyer's liability and seller remedies....many thanks!!!
Write a reply…


Submit reply


Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register
  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: April 11, 2016
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Would you rather find

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.