In the evolutionary road to socialism 15 marker, I basically wrote about how they want evolutionary rather than revolutionary because revolutionary gets rid of capitalism completely, and replaces it with a qualitatively different system, which revisionist socialists don't want as they realize the necessity for capitalism to generate wealth so just want to reform it which can be done through evolutionary means. Then I went on to talk about the inevitability of gradualism, and then, in a third paragraph, I mentioned how they would also support the evolutionary road because they do think that the state is a neutral arbiter rather than a state in the interests of the bourgeoisie so can reform gradually, and evolve rather than have to have a revolution etc. Is this ok? Or was the whole answer meant to be wholly centered around gradualism?