How did you guys find it? Personally i felt that it was great but now i have lost a potential 3 marks because i never took into account the number density when working out the drift velocity ratio. Does anyone remember what the question specifically asked?
It said that the wires were made of the same material, so the number density is the same. For the first ratio (mean velocity in y/ mean velocity in z) and the last one (power in y/ power in z), did you get 2 (for both of them)?
How did you guys find it? Personally i felt that it was great but now i have lost a potential 3 marks because i never took into account the number density when working out the drift velocity ratio. Does anyone remember what the question specifically asked?
Thought that was a very hard question. The rest was okay though. How did u prove the V=I/nAe one?
It said that the wires were made of the same material, so the number density is the same. For the first ratio (mean velocity in y/ mean velocity in z) and the last one (power in y/ power in z), did you get 2 (for both of them)?
But doesen't optimizing the cross sectional are change the amount of electrons in the wire?
It said that the wires were made of the same material, so the number density is the same. For the first ratio (mean velocity in y/ mean velocity in z) and the last one (power in y/ power in z), did you get 2 (for both of them)?
I got 2 for the power and 4 for the mean velocity.
How did you guys find it? Personally i felt that it was great but now i have lost a potential 3 marks because i never took into account the number density when working out the drift velocity ratio. Does anyone remember what the question specifically asked?
I got 2 for both the ratios we had to calculate. :/
I got 2 for the power and 4 for the mean velocity.
You got both right. I just realized that length of wire does not affect mean drift velocity as, if the current is to remain constant, the same number of electrons will have to pass a point per unit time, not travel the whole length of the wire. Do you remember how many marks this first ratio was worth? Was it 2 or 3?
You got both right. I just realized that length of wire does not affect mean drift velocity as, if the current is to remain constant, the same number of electrons will have to pass a point per unit time, not travel the whole length of the wire. Do you remember how many marks this first ratio was worth? Was it 2 or 3?
It was for 3 marks. How did u all calculate the pd of resistor Y.? I wrote that as the ratio for resistance in 1:2, pd ratio should also be same.
So compared to old exams do you think its easier or harder ? So grade boundaries are going up or down and by how much ? DON'T FORGET THAT WE HAD AN EXTRA 15 MINS COMPARED TO ALL PREVIOUS EXAMS!
You got both right. I just realized that length of wire does not affect mean drift velocity as, if the current is to remain constant, the same number of electrons will have to pass a point per unit time, not travel the whole length of the wire. Do you remember how many marks this first ratio was worth? Was it 2 or 3?
Though if the cross sectional area were to change, would that not change the number of charge carriers passing through the conductor? So wouldn't that change the mean drift velocity, even though the current were to remain constant?
Though if the cross sectional area were to change, would that not change the number of charge carriers passing through the conductor? So wouldn't that change the mean drift velocity, even though the current were to remain constant?
Yes, the cross sectional area was 4 times greater in Z than in Y, so the electrons in Z travel 4 times slower than in Y.