You are Here: Home >< Physics

# Edexcel International A level (IAL): Physics Unit 6 (WPH06) - 19th May, 2016 - PM

Announcements Posted on
Four hours left to win £100 of Amazon vouchers!! Don't miss out! Take our short survey to enter 24-10-2016
1. (Original post by The_Big_E)
What graph did you guys say to plot to find Cx for the capacitor question?
V2 against (V1-V2)
2. (Original post by The_Big_E)
What graph did you guys say to plot to find Cx for the capacitor question?

V2 against (V1-V2)
4. (Original post by Aimen.)
5. I think it was the hardest paper..
6. what do u guys think
7. (Original post by Aimen.)
Did somebody else get the value of p in Q#4 as -3553K?
That's almost my value yeah but it can't be negative
8. yea pleasee.. i hardly got things correct in question 1.
9. (Original post by Kev__)
oops yea it was cx/gradient , I did a mistake up there!
10. Any idea what the boundaries will be
11. In question 1.. how did u calculate W1? was it from the graph or using the gradient given? i found 0.65N using the gradient method. and 0.45N using graph.. shouldnt they be similar? or did i miscalculated from the graph?
12. (Original post by apocolyptic)
Any idea what the boundaries will be
something like this:
13. (Original post by Propoganda)
In question 1.. how did u calculate W1? was it from the graph or using the gradient given? i found 0.65N using the gradient method. and 0.45N using graph.. shouldnt they be similar? or did i miscalculated from the graph?
I did it from graph and it was 0.65 so they were equivalent cuz I matched with k value aswell and both methods gave 0.65 so probably you misread the graph!
14. what do u think the grade boundary will look like? will they do much scaling?
15. Okay. 1st Q: How'd you get the uncertainties? Did you use the graph anyhow? 2nd Q: Well I pretty much know what I got wrong there so whatevs. 3rd Q: .40+1.60=2.00s? 4Q: p=2.65 or sth? theoretical e=? This was so easy compared to the horror that was chemistry. Yet I choked. I feel effing miserable. Need the A too. 4 and 5 it is then, I guess
16. Question 1 killed the paper other than that its an okay paper
Its the strangest Q1 paper ever
17. What did you guys write for the things we had to measure for the question involving the capacitor?
18. In 1st question i multipled the lengtg by the gradient to get the weight got like 1.023 that correct?
And the uncertainity was 0.03
And pecentage was 1.47% correct?
And w2 also used same method and got .65 did what i do was correct
19. (Original post by Aimen.)
oops yea it was cx/gradient , I did a mistake up there!
Would this be right as well?

Graph of against where is the gradient.
20. (Original post by amohsen982)
In 1st question i multipled the lengtg by the gradient to get the weight got like 1.023 that correct?
And the uncertainity was 0.03
And pecentage was 1.47% correct?
And w2 also used same method and got .65 did what i do was correct
I think all of that is wrong.

## Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
1. this can't be left blank
2. this can't be left blank
3. this can't be left blank

6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

4. this can't be left empty
1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register

Updated: May 22, 2016
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Today on TSR

### Who is getting a uni offer this half term?

Find out which unis are hot off the mark here

Poll
Useful resources