You are Here: Home >< A-levels

# FP1 F1 IAL May 2016 Discussion

Announcements Posted on
TSR's new app is coming! Sign up here to try it first >> 17-10-2016
1. The FP1 GCE paper is mainly being discussed in the other thread so I thought we could iscuss the IAL paper here.
2. What did you guys get for the value of k? I got 1/5.
Some of my other answers were 49root2/2 for the area, -1/6+1/2i for the value of z, root3i and -root3i for the two other solutions of the quartic equation, rotation of 67.8 degrees anticlockwise for the matrix transformation. For the first question, the sum was (n/2)(n+1)(n+2)(n-3)
3. (Original post by The_Big_E)
What did you guys get for the value of k? I got 1/5.
Some of my other answers were 49root2/2 for the area, -1/6+1/2i for the value of z, root3i and -root3i for the two other solutions of the quartic equation, rotation of 67.8 degrees anticlockwise for the matrix transformation. For the first question, the sum was (n/2)(n+1)(n+2)(n-3)
Didn't find k, agreed with the rest, but i think i found 67.4 degrees anticlockwise (tan^-1 12/5)?
4. I dint find k either but my transformation was also 67.4 degrees anticlockwise. how did you show your root was correct to two d.p. in the numerical methods question
5. (Original post by queenoflean)
I dint find k either but my transformation was also 67.4 degrees anticlockwise. how did you show your root was correct to two d.p. in the numerical methods question

Didn't find that either, these were the only wrong things i got i think
6. (Original post by queenoflean)
I dint find k either but my transformation was also 67.4 degrees anticlockwise. how did you show your root was correct to two d.p. in the numerical methods question
Well my approximation was -1.64 so i tried doing f (-1.635) and f (-1.645) to see if there was a sign change, but that didnt work so 2 marks gone

Maybe you had to try again but using interval bisection or linear interpolation?
7. (Original post by The_Big_E)
Well my approximation was -1.64 so i tried doing f (-1.635) and f (-1.645) to see if there was a sign change, but that didnt work so 2 marks gone

Maybe you had to try again but using interval bisection or linear interpolation?
i tried f(-1.64) and i got -1.49 i think
8. (Original post by The_Big_E)
Well my approximation was -1.64 so i tried doing f (-1.635) and f (-1.645) to see if there was a sign change, but that didnt work so 2 marks gone

Maybe you had to try again but using interval bisection or linear interpolation?
I did f(-1.64) and got -.0075. and since -.0075x100=-.75, it was correct to two dp?
9. (Original post by queenoflean)
I did f(-1.64) and got -.0075. and since -.0075x100=-.75, it was correct to two dp?
That seems reasonable!
10. I wish we could get an unofficial mark scheme going, but it doesn't seem as if that many people sat for this exam
11. (Original post by queenoflean)
The FP1 GCE paper is mainly being discussed in the other thread so I thought we could iscuss the IAL paper here.
(Original post by The_Big_E)
What did you guys get for the value of k? I got 1/5.
Some of my other answers were 49root2/2 for the area, -1/6+1/2i for the value of z, root3i and -root3i for the two other solutions of the quartic equation, rotation of 67.8 degrees anticlockwise for the matrix transformation. For the first question, the sum was (n/2)(n+1)(n+2)(n-3)
(Original post by Chirstos Ioannou)
Didn't find k, agreed with the rest, but i think i found 67.4 degrees anticlockwise (tan^-1 12/5)?
(Original post by queenoflean)
I dint find k either but my transformation was also 67.4 degrees anticlockwise. how did you show your root was correct to two d.p. in the numerical methods question
(Original post by Chirstos Ioannou)
Didn't find that either, these were the only wrong things i got i think
(Original post by The_Big_E)
Well my approximation was -1.64 so i tried doing f (-1.635) and f (-1.645) to see if there was a sign change, but that didnt work so 2 marks gone

Maybe you had to try again but using interval bisection or linear interpolation?
(Original post by Chirstos Ioannou)
i tried f(-1.64) and i got -1.49 i think
(Original post by queenoflean)
I did f(-1.64) and got -.0075. and since -.0075x100=-.75, it was correct to two dp?
(Original post by Chirstos Ioannou)
That seems reasonable!
(Original post by queenoflean)
I wish we could get an unofficial mark scheme going, but it doesn't seem as if that many people sat for this exam

I have written solutions here

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show...3#post65033993

## Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
1. this can't be left blank
2. this can't be left blank
3. this can't be left blank

6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

4. this can't be left empty
1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register

Updated: May 22, 2016
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:

### How does exam reform affect you?

From GCSE to A level, it's all changing

Poll

## All the essentials

### Student life: what to expect

What it's really like going to uni

### Essay expert

Learn to write like a pro with our ultimate essay guide.

### Create a study plan

Get your head around what you need to do and when with the study planner tool.

### Resources by subject

Everything from mind maps to class notes.

### Study tips from A* students

Students who got top grades in their A-levels share their secrets