Year 12s: what will be the first way you research your future options? >>

Resolution 2006/29: Call for an investigation into Iranian arms shipments

Scroll to see replies

Reply 40

Craghyrax

China hopes that we won't be observing yet another olympic contest in 'fence sitting' :p:

Reply 41

ukebert

I must say that I think that is very likely...

Reply 42

Dempy

The People's Democratic Republic of Korea opposes this resolution on the grounds that it infringes and attacks Iran's rights.
We also oppose it, as the resolution is highly hypociritcal, as the US has been frequently known to supply weapons to states such as Israel, and terrorists who were "anti-communist".

Reply 43

kldhasnm

Dempy

The People's Democratic Republic of Korea opposes this resolution on the grounds that it infringes and attacks Iran's rights.

It is not the right of a nation to expect an international body, such as the UN, to support or acknowledge illegal acts. Supplying arms to terrorists, or causes furthuring terrorism, is an illegal act which opposes the core beliefs of what the UN was founded for and what is believes in today.

It is not an inalienable right, it is not a right even worth letting be (let alone supporting).

the resolution is highly hypociritcal, as the US has been frequently known to supply weapons to states such as Israel

The State of Israel is recognised country by the UN, a responsible carrier of diplomacy and a international presence promoting freedom and democracy. al-Qa'idah is a militant organisation of terrorists, unathorised and unrecognised by the UN and by responsible countries.

The fact of the matter is that foreign dipatches of military aid to an official state is legitimate; whereas, doing so covertly, to a dangerous and harmful terrorist organisation is not legitimate and reprehensible to the will of the UN.

and terrorists who were "anti-communist".

This is completely irrelevant and off-topic.

[ooc]It's also incorrect - although JFK propped up Diem and LBJ supporting Thieu; they were diplomats, leaders, politicians - not terrorists. The Bay of Pigs wasn't really funding terrorists - just exiled Communists. At least - this is the official line. :wink:

[/ooc]

Reply 44

global_warning

The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela does not support the resolution. The United States is pursuing an adversarial agenda against a sovereign nation of the Middle East under the cloak of the specious claim of "arms shipments". The United States has itself flooded the region with munitions of all descriptions. The United States is using these claims in order to further its plan of domination and control of the Middle East and Western Asia and their resources along with its strategy of geopolitical manipulation. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela extends solidarity to the Islamic Republic of Iran and urges it to reject all such infringements of its national integrity.

Reply 45

kldhasnm

global_warning

The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela does not support the resolution... The United States has itself flooded the region with munitions of all descriptions.

This is a completely unfounded statement, one which inflames a situation not worth creating.

The United States is using these claims in order to further its plan of domination and control of the Middle East and Western Asia and their resources along with its strategy of geopolitical manipulation.

These arm dispatches affects the entirety of the middle-eastern people, the UN and allied forces and the United States. To state that this resolution is a one-way mean of achieving furthur "geopolitical manipulation" is completely absurd and incorrect.

The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela extends solidarity to the Islamic Republic of Iran and urges it to reject all such infringements of its national integrity.

The American Representative extends a careful reminder of its country's ties with the United States and asks the Bolivian representative why he is broken common diplomatic etiquette and courtesy.

Reply 46

global_warning

prufrock

This is a completely unfounded statement, one which inflames a situation not worth creating. The American representative questions whether "flooding" trade, computers, machinery (for either civilian or military use) is such a bad thing - as Bolivia relies on American trade. In fact, the United States is Bolivia's largest trading partner. The American representative is baffled at this show of political aggression by the Bolivian representative and carefully reminds him of the relations between our two countries.

These arm dispatches affects the entirety of the middle-eastern people, the UN and allied forces and the United States. To state that this resolution is a one-way mean of achieving furthur "geopolitical manipulation" is completely absurd and incorrect.

The American Representative extends a careful reminder of its country's ties with the United States and asks the Bolivian representative why he is broken common diplomatic etiquette and courtesy with its most crucial trade ally.

A point of information for the Representative of the United States: The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela is not Bolivia, but Venezuela, and our republic is so named in tribute to Simon Bolivar.