Aqa law unit 3/4 *official thread*

Yes, involuntary manslaughter is not part of murder. In order to prove invol manslaughter you go the 3 part test for either and or both unlawful act and gross negligence. A general defence may also apply

http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects/AQA-LAW03-QP-JAN13.PDF

Can you explain to me how you would answer the question question on first scenario, I've learned all the content but can't get my head round the scenarios.

This without a doubt is a tricky question...

Basically:
Alice - Beth = Assault 'narrowly missed Beth' - wouldn't be guilty of an offence on the basis she hasn't formed the AR of assault 'to cause v to apprehend immediate unlawful personal violence' so no offence would be committed against Beth.
Alice- Chris = Transferred malice (do this when applying the MR) S.47 abh could be both an assault or battery but i'd argue an assault (it would be easier). Vs own act could also be made relevant.
Alice-Dave = s.20 gbh/s.18 its likely to be s.18 on the basis she intended to throw the vase at Beth but it missed her. (Thin skull rule can also be took into acc as can age)
Defences: Insanity and automatism.

REMEMBER TO DEFINE ABH AND GBH

Bit of a lengthy question for 25 marks ;/

Thank you can you answer my above question.. I am so bloody nervous my spot in uni depends on this exam Oh god if i dont get in im just gona end up working at macys

I haven't got time to answer it or I would what are you predicted?

ABB Need to get a B in law, its only a small question just asking for gross neglience manslaughter if

-Duty of care
-Breach of duty
-Gross negligence
-Risk of Death
which one would yout alk about causation?

Are we all hoping for the non-fatal reform essay?

What is the structure for answering a robbery scenario?

Confused as it doesn't have a proper actus Reus

Thanks