You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Need help on M1 Question - Working attached

Announcements Posted on
Would YOU be put off a uni with a high crime rate? First 50 to have their say get a £5 Amazon voucher! 27-10-2016
1. I'm currently doing this question, and can't seem to get the right answer. I have seen the mark scheme, but the method used is not something I would generally attempt first. I would resolve upwards to eliminate X to find R, in order to calculate the F value - to then use F=ma to find X. I have attached my working and would really appreciate it if someone could spot where I'm going wrong in my method, as I've attempted this many times with no luck of reaching the correct answer of X = 45N.

Thanks
Attachment 539451539455
Attached Images

2. (Original post by Louiseelg0rt)
I'm currently doing this question, and can't seem to get the right answer. I have seen the mark scheme, but the method used is not something I would generally attempt first. I would resolve upwards to eliminate X to find R, in order to calculate the F value - to then use F=ma to find X. I have attached my working and would really appreciate it if someone could spot where I'm going wrong in my method, as I've attempted this many times with no luck of reaching the correct answer of X = 45N.

Thanks
Attachment 539451539455
P is accelerating up the plane. The acceleration has a horizontal component and a vertical component.

Resolving vertically, upward force does not equal downwards force.

Edit: Not checked all of it.
3. (Original post by Louiseelg0rt)
I'm currently doing this question, and can't seem to get the right answer. I have seen the mark scheme, but the method used is not something I would generally attempt first. I would resolve upwards to eliminate X to find R, in order to calculate the F value - to then use F=ma to find X. I have attached my working and would really appreciate it if someone could spot where I'm going wrong in my method, as I've attempted this many times with no luck of reaching the correct answer of X = 45N.
Resolving parallel to the slope is perfect, good job on that.

Unfortuantely, you need to resolve perpendicular to the slope to get another equation to find friction and reaction. If you resolve vertically, it's not in vertical equilibrium so your equation doesn't hold.

Edit: Ninja'd.
4. Zacken ghostwalker
Thank you! I was treating this like a standard statics problem, I see why it's wrong now.

## Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
1. this can't be left blank
2. this can't be left blank
3. this can't be left blank

6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

4. this can't be left empty
your full birthday is required
1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register

Updated: May 27, 2016
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Today on TSR

### University open days

Is it worth going? Find out here

Poll
Useful resources

## Make your revision easier

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read here first

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Study resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.